Is there the Pareto principle in public library circulation? A case study of one public library in Taiwan

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.22452/mjlis.vol24no2.6
Y. Yang, J. Shieh
{"title":"Is there the Pareto principle in public library circulation? A case study of one public library in Taiwan","authors":"Y. Yang, J. Shieh","doi":"10.22452/mjlis.vol24no2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pareto Principle, also known as the 80/20 rule is currently an important and popular management rule applied to marketing and customer relationship management (CRM). The rule indicates that the vital few causes inputs or efforts bringing the most results, outputs, or rewards. Analyzing circulation data to understand the usage status of library collections can help libraries comprehend their patrons’ behaviour. However, little research has been done to analyse circulation data of public libraries to reveal patrons’ usage behaviours. This paper aimed to analyse the circulation data generated by a municipality public library in Taiwan to gauge if the Pareto Principle manifested in this context. Subsequently, using bibliomining analysis, this research further identified vital patrons and their characteristics, as well as book-borrowed distributions to help analyse patrons' book borrowing behaviour to improve the efficiency of library management and library marketing as well as CRM. The circulation data of the public library follows the Pareto Principle, approximating to the 80/20 rule. Findings showed that when the accumulative percentage of patron is 24.7 percent, the accumulative percentage of borrowed books is 75.3 percent. The vital few patrons borrow the majority of the collections. This paper is the first study to reveal that the Pareto Principle could be found in circulation data of a public library in Taiwan. It could help libraries identify vital patrons and major collections, and improve the efficiency of their management and marketing activities in future. For other types of libraries, it would be interesting for us to explore the existence of the Pareto Principle further.","PeriodicalId":45072,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no2.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Pareto Principle, also known as the 80/20 rule is currently an important and popular management rule applied to marketing and customer relationship management (CRM). The rule indicates that the vital few causes inputs or efforts bringing the most results, outputs, or rewards. Analyzing circulation data to understand the usage status of library collections can help libraries comprehend their patrons’ behaviour. However, little research has been done to analyse circulation data of public libraries to reveal patrons’ usage behaviours. This paper aimed to analyse the circulation data generated by a municipality public library in Taiwan to gauge if the Pareto Principle manifested in this context. Subsequently, using bibliomining analysis, this research further identified vital patrons and their characteristics, as well as book-borrowed distributions to help analyse patrons' book borrowing behaviour to improve the efficiency of library management and library marketing as well as CRM. The circulation data of the public library follows the Pareto Principle, approximating to the 80/20 rule. Findings showed that when the accumulative percentage of patron is 24.7 percent, the accumulative percentage of borrowed books is 75.3 percent. The vital few patrons borrow the majority of the collections. This paper is the first study to reveal that the Pareto Principle could be found in circulation data of a public library in Taiwan. It could help libraries identify vital patrons and major collections, and improve the efficiency of their management and marketing activities in future. For other types of libraries, it would be interesting for us to explore the existence of the Pareto Principle further.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共图书馆流通是否存在帕累托原则?以台湾某公共图书馆为例
帕累托原则,也被称为80/20规则,是目前应用于市场营销和客户关系管理(CRM)的一个重要和流行的管理规则。这条规则表明,少数至关重要的投入或努力会带来最多的结果、产出或回报。分析流通数据,了解图书馆馆藏的使用状况,有助于图书馆了解读者的行为。然而,对公共图书馆的流通数据进行分析以揭示读者使用行为的研究却很少。本文旨在分析台湾某市立公共图书馆的流通数据,以衡量帕累托原则是否适用于此。随后,本研究利用文献挖掘分析,进一步确定了重要读者及其特征,以及借阅分布,有助于分析读者借阅行为,从而提高图书馆管理、营销和客户关系管理的效率。公共图书馆的流通量数据遵循帕累托法则,近似于80/20法则。结果表明,当累计读者比例为24.7%时,累计借阅比例为75.3%。少数重要的赞助人借走了大部分藏品。本研究首次在台湾公共图书馆的流通资料中发现帕累托原理。它可以帮助图书馆识别重要的读者和重要的馆藏,提高图书馆未来管理和营销活动的效率。对于其他类型的库,我们进一步探索帕累托原则的存在将是很有趣的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A study on the election factors of ACM Fellow based on the co-authorship relationship Compromising quality parameters lead to fallout: a study of de-indexing of research journals Teaching strategies for library instruction: directions from the literature Strategies for building institutional repositories a case study of content recruitment in Malaysian higher learning institutions Exploring authors engagement in journals with questionable practices: a case study of OMICS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1