Poetry and Process

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM MIDWEST QUARTERLY-A JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY THOUGHT Pub Date : 2004-03-22 DOI:10.2307/j.ctt1w0dbmn.9
April Fallon
{"title":"Poetry and Process","authors":"April Fallon","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt1w0dbmn.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ONE OF THE MAJOR distinguishing traits of the Modernist Poets--which has also been one of their legacies bestowed upon subsequent generations--is their interest in philosophical ideas that explore the nature of an individual's relationship with the external world. Even at the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is still difficult to avoid the influence of the Modernist Poets. The Modernists were the first generation of poets to write in direct response to the modern milieu that essentially separates us in experience from all previous eras. Their revolutions in form, subject, style, theme, and philosophy have transformed poetry from the strictly metered forms and styles of the previous centuries into the highly solipsistic, and as Randy Malamud termed it in The Language of Modernism, the \"difficult, confusing, obfuscatory\" (2) forms poetry often takes. Whether most current poets believe it or not, they still show the presence of the Modernists (for better and for worse) in their writing, despite the pervasive application of the term postmodernism. The preoccupation of some postmodernist poetry with what Paul Hoover defined in the Introduction to Postmodern American Poetry as \"'the death of God and the author,\" and with \"oppositional strategies\" such as \"the empty sign\" (xxvii), is largely an intensification of modernism, in that the writing still responds to modern urban culture, and that postmodernist writing still utilizes many of the same techniques--juxtaposition, irony, and paradox--as the modernists used. The prevailing assumption of much postmodern poetry, that the poet's primary expression is one of solipsistic self-reflexivity with a tendency toward nihilism, has been a guiding literary concept for several decades. While on the surface the solitary nature of being a poet seems to validate many of the philosophical suppositions of literary deconstructionism, I have always harbored doubts about the creative possibilities of what seems to be a very narrow view of experience. It was from this impetus that I began to search for philosophical ideas that would better represent my own thinking and intuition about the creative impulse and would offer a more fertile set of assumptions and ideals for creative activity. It is in the work of Process Philosophers Henri Bergson and Alfred North Whitehead in relation to the concept of the individual's experience of and interaction with temporality that my own hunches about the nature of creativity are best represented. My proposal is a simple as this: that Bergson's and Whitehead's views of temporality are fundamental principles, and the concept of the essential interrelatedness of things provides the basis for a much more fruitful artistic aesthetic that I am terming the poetics of process, than does current deconstructive postmodern poetics. Nietzsche and the Responses to the External World by Modernism and Postmodernism The influence of philosophy on the Modernist Poets, and particularly the philosophers of the late nineteenth century, is well known. As Sanford Schwartz detailed in The Matrix of Modernism, the major features of modernism, \"abrupt juxtaposition, irony, paradox, and the like\" (3), are not simply the unmediated responses of artists to the social and religious breakdown of the turn of the century. True, modernism is a clear response to the miasma caused by the shift in western society from a rural, Christian existence to an urban, secular one; the rise of industrialization and its subsequent slums and robber barons, and Darwin's Theory of Evolution brought with them a wave of anxiety and skepticism would be aptly labeled alienation. Yet many of the poets interpreted these phenomena as the consequences of a society that had adopted the nihilism discussed in the work of some nineteenth and early twentieth century philosophers. Lawrence Gamache also noted in \"'Toward a Definition of 'Modernism'\" that in the shift to the modernist period, \"there has been a progression from the optimistic attempt to discover the real world, studied confidently as the proper object of philosophy and science and as the artist's guide, to man reduced to skepticism and his own subjectivity\" (36). …","PeriodicalId":41150,"journal":{"name":"MIDWEST QUARTERLY-A JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY THOUGHT","volume":"36 1","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIDWEST QUARTERLY-A JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY THOUGHT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1w0dbmn.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ONE OF THE MAJOR distinguishing traits of the Modernist Poets--which has also been one of their legacies bestowed upon subsequent generations--is their interest in philosophical ideas that explore the nature of an individual's relationship with the external world. Even at the beginning of the twenty-first century, it is still difficult to avoid the influence of the Modernist Poets. The Modernists were the first generation of poets to write in direct response to the modern milieu that essentially separates us in experience from all previous eras. Their revolutions in form, subject, style, theme, and philosophy have transformed poetry from the strictly metered forms and styles of the previous centuries into the highly solipsistic, and as Randy Malamud termed it in The Language of Modernism, the "difficult, confusing, obfuscatory" (2) forms poetry often takes. Whether most current poets believe it or not, they still show the presence of the Modernists (for better and for worse) in their writing, despite the pervasive application of the term postmodernism. The preoccupation of some postmodernist poetry with what Paul Hoover defined in the Introduction to Postmodern American Poetry as "'the death of God and the author," and with "oppositional strategies" such as "the empty sign" (xxvii), is largely an intensification of modernism, in that the writing still responds to modern urban culture, and that postmodernist writing still utilizes many of the same techniques--juxtaposition, irony, and paradox--as the modernists used. The prevailing assumption of much postmodern poetry, that the poet's primary expression is one of solipsistic self-reflexivity with a tendency toward nihilism, has been a guiding literary concept for several decades. While on the surface the solitary nature of being a poet seems to validate many of the philosophical suppositions of literary deconstructionism, I have always harbored doubts about the creative possibilities of what seems to be a very narrow view of experience. It was from this impetus that I began to search for philosophical ideas that would better represent my own thinking and intuition about the creative impulse and would offer a more fertile set of assumptions and ideals for creative activity. It is in the work of Process Philosophers Henri Bergson and Alfred North Whitehead in relation to the concept of the individual's experience of and interaction with temporality that my own hunches about the nature of creativity are best represented. My proposal is a simple as this: that Bergson's and Whitehead's views of temporality are fundamental principles, and the concept of the essential interrelatedness of things provides the basis for a much more fruitful artistic aesthetic that I am terming the poetics of process, than does current deconstructive postmodern poetics. Nietzsche and the Responses to the External World by Modernism and Postmodernism The influence of philosophy on the Modernist Poets, and particularly the philosophers of the late nineteenth century, is well known. As Sanford Schwartz detailed in The Matrix of Modernism, the major features of modernism, "abrupt juxtaposition, irony, paradox, and the like" (3), are not simply the unmediated responses of artists to the social and religious breakdown of the turn of the century. True, modernism is a clear response to the miasma caused by the shift in western society from a rural, Christian existence to an urban, secular one; the rise of industrialization and its subsequent slums and robber barons, and Darwin's Theory of Evolution brought with them a wave of anxiety and skepticism would be aptly labeled alienation. Yet many of the poets interpreted these phenomena as the consequences of a society that had adopted the nihilism discussed in the work of some nineteenth and early twentieth century philosophers. Lawrence Gamache also noted in "'Toward a Definition of 'Modernism'" that in the shift to the modernist period, "there has been a progression from the optimistic attempt to discover the real world, studied confidently as the proper object of philosophy and science and as the artist's guide, to man reduced to skepticism and his own subjectivity" (36). …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诗歌与过程
现代主义诗人最显著的特点之一——也是他们留给后代的遗产之一——是他们对探索个人与外部世界关系本质的哲学思想的兴趣。即使在21世纪初,现代主义诗人的影响仍然难以避免。现代主义者是第一代直接回应现代环境的诗人,这种环境在本质上将我们的经历与以往所有时代分开。他们在形式、主题、风格、主题和哲学上的革命,使诗歌从前几个世纪严格的形式和风格转变为高度唯我主义,正如兰迪·马拉默德在《现代主义的语言》中所说的那样,诗歌通常采用“困难、混乱、模糊”的形式。不管大多数当代诗人相信与否,尽管后现代主义这个词被广泛使用,但他们的作品中仍然表现出现代主义的存在(不管是好是坏)。一些后现代主义诗歌专注于保罗·胡佛在《后现代美国诗歌导论》中定义的“上帝和作者的死亡”,以及“对立策略”,如“空符号”(xxvii),这在很大程度上是现代主义的强化,因为写作仍然回应现代城市文化,后现代主义写作仍然使用许多相同的技巧——并置、讽刺和悖论——就像现代主义者使用的那样。几十年来,许多后现代诗歌的主流假设是,诗人的主要表达是一种带有虚无主义倾向的唯我主义自我反思。虽然从表面上看,诗人的孤独本质似乎证实了文学解构主义的许多哲学假设,但我一直对似乎非常狭隘的经验观点的创作可能性持怀疑态度。正是在这种推动下,我开始寻找能够更好地代表我自己对创造性冲动的思考和直觉的哲学思想,并为创造性活动提供一套更丰富的假设和理想。在过程哲学家亨利·柏格森和阿尔弗雷德·诺斯·怀特黑德的作品中,我对创造力本质的预感得到了最好的体现,这与个人对时间性的体验和互动的概念有关。我的建议很简单:柏格森和怀特黑德关于时间性的观点是基本原则,事物本质相互关联的概念为一种更富有成果的艺术美学提供了基础,我称之为过程的诗学,而不是当前的解构主义后现代诗学。哲学对现代主义诗人,尤其是19世纪晚期哲学家的影响是众所周知的。正如Sanford Schwartz在《现代主义矩阵》中详述的那样,现代主义的主要特征,“突然性的并列、反讽、悖论等等”(3),不仅仅是艺术家对世纪之交社会和宗教崩溃的直接反应。诚然,现代主义是对西方社会从农村、基督教社会向城市、世俗社会转变所产生的瘴气的明确回应;工业化的兴起以及随之而来的贫民窟和强盗大亨,以及达尔文的进化论带来的焦虑和怀疑浪潮,这些都将被恰当地贴上异化的标签。然而,许多诗人将这些现象解释为一个采纳了虚无主义的社会的后果,这些虚无主义在一些19世纪和20世纪早期的哲学家的作品中得到了讨论。劳伦斯·伽马奇也在“走向‘现代主义’的定义”中指出,在向现代主义时期的转变中,“从乐观地试图发现真实世界,自信地作为哲学和科学的适当对象和艺术家的指导进行研究,到人类被贬低为怀疑主义和他自己的主观性”(36)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Ethics of Admiration-And Detraction Poetry and Process Pacific Poetics: Melville's South Seas Laugh The Road Back Ring Lardner and the Other
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1