A User's Guide to the Stored Communications Act, and a Legislator's Guide to Amending it

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW George Washington Law Review Pub Date : 2003-08-05 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.421860
Orin S. Kerr
{"title":"A User's Guide to the Stored Communications Act, and a Legislator's Guide to Amending it","authors":"Orin S. Kerr","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.421860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Americans care deeply about their Internet privacy. But if they want to know how federal law protects the privacy of their stored Internet communications, they'll quickly learn that it's surprisingly difficult to figure out. The federal statute that protects the privacy of stored Internet communications is the Stored Communications Act (SCA), passed as part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 and codified at 18 U.S.C. section 2701-11. But courts, legislators, and even legal scholars have had a very hard time understanding the method behind the madness of the SCA. The statute is dense and confusing, and that confusion has made it difficult for legislators to legislate in the field, reporters to report about it, and scholars to write scholarship in this very important area.This Article presents a user's guide to the SCA. It explains in relatively simple terms the structure and text of the Act so that legislators, courts, academics, and students can understand how it works - and in some cases, how it doesn't work. I hope to explain the basic nuts and bolts of the statute and show that the statute works reasonably effectively, although certainly not perfectly. My second goal is to show how Congress needs to amend the SCA. I recommend three ways that Congress should rethink the SCA to better protect the privacy of stored Internet communications, clarify its protections, and update the statute for the present. Specifically, I argue that Congress should raise the threshold the government must satisfy to compel the contents of certain Internet communications; that it should simplify the statute dramatically by eliminating the confusing categories of electronic communication service and remote computing service, and eliminating redundant text; and that it should restructure the remedies scheme for violations of the statute.","PeriodicalId":47068,"journal":{"name":"George Washington Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"George Washington Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.421860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Americans care deeply about their Internet privacy. But if they want to know how federal law protects the privacy of their stored Internet communications, they'll quickly learn that it's surprisingly difficult to figure out. The federal statute that protects the privacy of stored Internet communications is the Stored Communications Act (SCA), passed as part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 and codified at 18 U.S.C. section 2701-11. But courts, legislators, and even legal scholars have had a very hard time understanding the method behind the madness of the SCA. The statute is dense and confusing, and that confusion has made it difficult for legislators to legislate in the field, reporters to report about it, and scholars to write scholarship in this very important area.This Article presents a user's guide to the SCA. It explains in relatively simple terms the structure and text of the Act so that legislators, courts, academics, and students can understand how it works - and in some cases, how it doesn't work. I hope to explain the basic nuts and bolts of the statute and show that the statute works reasonably effectively, although certainly not perfectly. My second goal is to show how Congress needs to amend the SCA. I recommend three ways that Congress should rethink the SCA to better protect the privacy of stored Internet communications, clarify its protections, and update the statute for the present. Specifically, I argue that Congress should raise the threshold the government must satisfy to compel the contents of certain Internet communications; that it should simplify the statute dramatically by eliminating the confusing categories of electronic communication service and remote computing service, and eliminating redundant text; and that it should restructure the remedies scheme for violations of the statute.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《存储通信法案用户指南》和《立法者修改指南》
美国人非常关心他们的网络隐私。但如果他们想知道联邦法律是如何保护他们存储的互联网通信隐私的,他们很快就会发现,要弄清楚这一点是非常困难的。保护存储互联网通信隐私的联邦法规是《存储通信法案》(SCA),该法案作为1986年《电子通信隐私法案》的一部分通过,并在《美国法典》第18编第2701-11条中编纂。但是,法院、立法者,甚至法律学者都很难理解SCA疯狂背后的方法。这个法规是密集而混乱的,这种混乱使得立法者很难在这个领域立法,记者很难报道它,学者也很难在这个非常重要的领域撰写学术论文。本文提供了SCA的用户指南。它以相对简单的语言解释了该法案的结构和文本,以便立法者、法院、学者和学生能够理解它是如何运作的——在某些情况下,它是如何不起作用的。我希望解释该法规的基本细节,并表明该法规合理有效地发挥作用,尽管肯定不是完美的。我的第二个目标是展示国会需要如何修改SCA。我建议国会通过三种方式重新考虑SCA,以更好地保护存储的互联网通信的隐私,澄清其保护,并更新当前的法规。具体来说,我认为国会应该提高政府必须满足的门槛,以强制提供某些互联网通信的内容;它应该通过消除电子通信服务和远程计算服务的混淆类别以及消除冗余的文本来大幅简化法规;它应该对违反法令的补救方案进行重组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
The Jurisprudence of Justice Samuel Alito Measuring Computer Use Norms The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties and the Right to Marry: Why Article 23(2) of the ICCPR Should Be Re-Interpreted to Encompass Same-Sex Marriage Religion, Conscience, and Belief in the European Court of Human Rights Four Challenges Confronting a Moral Conception of Universal Human Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1