Labyrinths of neoliberalism: A brief review of the history of the term and the diversity of concepts

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Sociologija Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/SOC2101096K
Sonja Kuzmančev-Stanojević
{"title":"Labyrinths of neoliberalism: A brief review of the history of the term and the diversity of concepts","authors":"Sonja Kuzmančev-Stanojević","doi":"10.2298/SOC2101096K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes one of the most used and most common terms today. Because of that ?familiarity? and general ?comprehensibility?, it often happens that the term neoliberalism as a commonplace argues a lot of things, while its meaning is tacitly implied. Therefore, it is necessary to return to the beginning - to the analysis of the concept through the prism of its historical development, gradually moving towards the definition of its contemporary meaning. It becomes clear how much the concept in question has changed and how much its meaning has taken on different connotations at different stages of its historical development and in the historical transformations of its intellectual and ideological existence already in this endeavor. At the same time, the contextuality of neoliberalism, in addition to being necessarily conditioned by its temporal, is also conditioned by its spatially differentiated varieties. Neoliberalism manifests itself differently in different places, leading to the inequality of its geographical development. Labyrinths are further complicated by the diversity of conceptualizations of neoliberalism as economic policy, as ideology and as governmentality. Understanding neoliberalism in its multiple manifestations, however, also includes a correct understanding of all three of these views.","PeriodicalId":43515,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2101096K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper analyzes one of the most used and most common terms today. Because of that ?familiarity? and general ?comprehensibility?, it often happens that the term neoliberalism as a commonplace argues a lot of things, while its meaning is tacitly implied. Therefore, it is necessary to return to the beginning - to the analysis of the concept through the prism of its historical development, gradually moving towards the definition of its contemporary meaning. It becomes clear how much the concept in question has changed and how much its meaning has taken on different connotations at different stages of its historical development and in the historical transformations of its intellectual and ideological existence already in this endeavor. At the same time, the contextuality of neoliberalism, in addition to being necessarily conditioned by its temporal, is also conditioned by its spatially differentiated varieties. Neoliberalism manifests itself differently in different places, leading to the inequality of its geographical development. Labyrinths are further complicated by the diversity of conceptualizations of neoliberalism as economic policy, as ideology and as governmentality. Understanding neoliberalism in its multiple manifestations, however, also includes a correct understanding of all three of these views.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新自由主义的迷宫:对该术语的历史和概念多样性的简要回顾
本文分析了当今最常用和最常见的术语之一。因为那种熟悉感?一般的?可理解性?在美国,新自由主义这个词作为一种老生常谈,常常能说明很多问题,而它的含义却被默认了。因此,有必要回到起点——通过其历史发展的棱镜来分析这个概念,逐步走向对其当代意义的定义。我们可以清楚地看到,这个有问题的概念发生了多大的变化,它的意义在其历史发展的不同阶段,以及在其智力和意识形态存在的历史转变中,呈现出了多少不同的内涵。与此同时,新自由主义的语境,除了必然受到其时间的制约外,还受到其空间差异品种的制约。新自由主义在不同的地方表现不同,导致其地理发展的不平等。作为经济政策、意识形态和治理方式的新自由主义概念的多样性,使这一迷宫进一步复杂化。然而,理解新自由主义的多种表现形式,也包括对这三种观点的正确理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologija
Sociologija SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Computational thinking in education - epistemology, pedagogy and politics Squeezing dried fruits: Mixed methods, methodological dogmatism and methodological eclecticism Some observations on the methodological approach to biography of the first female members of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts The importance of physical appearance and actual body figure of women in Serbia in the contemporary sociocultural environment The experience of cities during the COVID 19 pandemic: What are we going to do now?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1