Perceptions of the fairness of income distribution in Serbia: A comparative perspective

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Sociologija Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/soc2102203m
Andjelka Mirkov, Željka Manić
{"title":"Perceptions of the fairness of income distribution in Serbia: A comparative perspective","authors":"Andjelka Mirkov, Željka Manić","doi":"10.2298/soc2102203m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines perceptions of the fairness of income distribution in Serbia from a comparative perspective. The analysis is based on data collected under Round 9 of the European Social Survey in 2018/2019. Perceptions of the fairness of personal income in Serbia are compared with those from three post- Yugoslav countries (Montenegro, Croatia and Slovenia) and three developed capitalist countries (Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom). The research findings indicate that the vast majority of Serbian citizens perceive their personal income (gross and net pay, pensions and social benefits) as being unfairly low. From a comparative perspective, it is noticeable that the perceived fairness of income distribution is influenced by a contextual variable that combines the effects of economic development, degree of income inequality and path dependency. Income from work (gross and net pay) is more often perceived as unfairly low in the post-Yugoslav countries of the Western Balkans (Serbia and Montenegro) than in the post-Yugoslav countries that are members of the European Union (Croatia and Slovenia). When it comes to perceptions of the fairness of pensions and social benefits, the two groups of the post-Yugoslav countries do not differ from each other. All types of income are more likely to be perceived as unfairly low in the Western Balkan states than in the developed capitalist countries.","PeriodicalId":43515,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/soc2102203m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper examines perceptions of the fairness of income distribution in Serbia from a comparative perspective. The analysis is based on data collected under Round 9 of the European Social Survey in 2018/2019. Perceptions of the fairness of personal income in Serbia are compared with those from three post- Yugoslav countries (Montenegro, Croatia and Slovenia) and three developed capitalist countries (Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom). The research findings indicate that the vast majority of Serbian citizens perceive their personal income (gross and net pay, pensions and social benefits) as being unfairly low. From a comparative perspective, it is noticeable that the perceived fairness of income distribution is influenced by a contextual variable that combines the effects of economic development, degree of income inequality and path dependency. Income from work (gross and net pay) is more often perceived as unfairly low in the post-Yugoslav countries of the Western Balkans (Serbia and Montenegro) than in the post-Yugoslav countries that are members of the European Union (Croatia and Slovenia). When it comes to perceptions of the fairness of pensions and social benefits, the two groups of the post-Yugoslav countries do not differ from each other. All types of income are more likely to be perceived as unfairly low in the Western Balkan states than in the developed capitalist countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对塞尔维亚收入分配公平性的看法:比较视角
本文从比较的角度考察了对塞尔维亚收入分配公平性的看法。该分析基于2018/2019年欧洲社会调查第九轮收集的数据。对塞尔维亚个人收入公平性的看法与三个后南斯拉夫国家(黑山、克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚)和三个发达资本主义国家(德国、瑞典和英国)进行了比较。研究结果表明,绝大多数塞尔维亚公民认为他们的个人收入(工资毛额和净额、养恤金和社会福利)低得不公平。从比较的角度来看,值得注意的是,感知到的收入分配公平受到一个背景变量的影响,该变量结合了经济发展、收入不平等程度和路径依赖的影响。工作收入(毛额和净额)在西巴尔干的后南斯拉夫国家(塞尔维亚和黑山)比在属于欧洲联盟成员的后南斯拉夫国家(克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚)往往被认为低得不公平。当谈到对养恤金和社会福利的公平性的看法时,后南斯拉夫国家的这两个集团彼此之间并没有什么不同。与发达资本主义国家相比,西巴尔干国家的所有类型的收入都更有可能被认为是不公平的低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologija
Sociologija SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Computational thinking in education - epistemology, pedagogy and politics Squeezing dried fruits: Mixed methods, methodological dogmatism and methodological eclecticism Some observations on the methodological approach to biography of the first female members of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts The importance of physical appearance and actual body figure of women in Serbia in the contemporary sociocultural environment The experience of cities during the COVID 19 pandemic: What are we going to do now?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1