The redevelopment of military barracks between discourses of urban development and heritage protection: The case study of Nis, Serbia

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spatium Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/spat2146022j
Ljiljana Jevremovic, A. Stanojević, Isidora Djordjevic, Branko Turnsek
{"title":"The redevelopment of military barracks between discourses of urban development and heritage protection: The case study of Nis, Serbia","authors":"Ljiljana Jevremovic, A. Stanojević, Isidora Djordjevic, Branko Turnsek","doi":"10.2298/spat2146022j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Areas of disused military barracks are commonly exploited as a land resource that is attractive for redevelopment, within the urban city area. Their commercial potential is high on the list of attractiveness, primarily based on the value of the site?s disposition, size, and capacity for redevelopment in terms of rebuilding. Contemporary architectural practice is often directed towards urban redevelopment projects in military areas whose position and other characteristics are valued by investors as crucial commercial benefits. These sites may be places of tangible cultural heritage based on recognized architectural heritage and social memory. The paper presents a comparative study of the redevelopment of two former military barracks in Nis - Bubanjski Heroji and Filip Kljajic. These sites share the same disposition within the city but diverge in terms of their size, historical importance, and discourse of redevelopment. The comparison is presented from four perspectives: planning, built heritage, public perception, and cultural meaning. By examining the transformation of the complexes, the paper aims to perform a critical review which compares the reality of urban transformations in Serbia with the theoretical background and current urban regeneration policies promoted worldwide. This paper exploits the HUL approach, an integrated approach to urban management promoted by UNESCO, by extracting and analyzing four principles: the historical layering of cultural and natural heritage and attributes, dynamic character of urban space, promotion of social diversity, and balanced relation between artificial and natural. The conclusions highlight the difference between the local practices of commercially- and heritage-led redevelopment in order to suggest some improvements for similar redevelopment projects in the future.","PeriodicalId":38713,"journal":{"name":"Spatium","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/spat2146022j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Areas of disused military barracks are commonly exploited as a land resource that is attractive for redevelopment, within the urban city area. Their commercial potential is high on the list of attractiveness, primarily based on the value of the site?s disposition, size, and capacity for redevelopment in terms of rebuilding. Contemporary architectural practice is often directed towards urban redevelopment projects in military areas whose position and other characteristics are valued by investors as crucial commercial benefits. These sites may be places of tangible cultural heritage based on recognized architectural heritage and social memory. The paper presents a comparative study of the redevelopment of two former military barracks in Nis - Bubanjski Heroji and Filip Kljajic. These sites share the same disposition within the city but diverge in terms of their size, historical importance, and discourse of redevelopment. The comparison is presented from four perspectives: planning, built heritage, public perception, and cultural meaning. By examining the transformation of the complexes, the paper aims to perform a critical review which compares the reality of urban transformations in Serbia with the theoretical background and current urban regeneration policies promoted worldwide. This paper exploits the HUL approach, an integrated approach to urban management promoted by UNESCO, by extracting and analyzing four principles: the historical layering of cultural and natural heritage and attributes, dynamic character of urban space, promotion of social diversity, and balanced relation between artificial and natural. The conclusions highlight the difference between the local practices of commercially- and heritage-led redevelopment in order to suggest some improvements for similar redevelopment projects in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市发展与遗产保护话语之间的军营重建:以塞尔维亚尼什为例
在市区内,废弃的军营区域通常被开发为有吸引力的再开发土地资源。它们的商业潜力在吸引力榜单上名列前茅,主要基于网站的价值。在重建方面,美国的配置,规模和再开发能力。当代建筑实践通常针对军事地区的城市改造项目,其位置和其他特征被投资者视为重要的商业利益。这些遗址可能是基于公认的建筑遗产和社会记忆的物质文化遗产。本文对Nis - Bubanjski - Heroji和philip Kljajic两个前军营的重建进行了比较研究。这些地点在城市中拥有相同的配置,但在规模、历史重要性和重建话语方面存在差异。从规划、建筑遗产、公众感知和文化意义四个方面进行比较。通过研究综合体的转型,本文旨在进行批判性审查,将塞尔维亚城市转型的现实与理论背景和当前世界范围内推广的城市更新政策进行比较。本文利用联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)倡导的城市管理综合方法HUL方法,提取并分析了文化与自然遗产和属性的历史分层、城市空间的动态特征、促进社会多样性、人工与自然平衡关系等四个原则。这些结论强调了以商业为主导的重建与以遗产为主导的重建之间的差异,以便为未来类似的重建项目提供一些改进建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spatium
Spatium Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The first community housing model constructed in Hungary - the collective house in Miskolc Credibility of legalization: Illegally constructed buildings in Serbia Rethinking soviet era mass housing in Kazakhstan Are we discriminating towards guests with disabilities? Accessibility analyses of public restaurants facilities in the Republic of Slovenia The impact of energy improvement measures in single-family residential buildings on air pollution in the city of Uzice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1