Biological markers of severity in acute pancreatitis

A. Pallisera, R. Jorba, J. Ramia, J. Rodríguez, H. Subirana, L. O. Zárate, J. González, S. Navarro
{"title":"Biological markers of severity in acute pancreatitis","authors":"A. Pallisera, R. Jorba, J. Ramia, J. Rodríguez, H. Subirana, L. O. Zárate, J. González, S. Navarro","doi":"10.2478/s11536-014-0503-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractNone of the definitions of severity used in acute pancreatitis (AP) is ideal. Many of the scoring systems used to predict and measure its severity are complex, cumbersome and inaccurate.Aimto evaluate the usefulness of the most commonly used early markers for predicting severity, necrosis and mortality in patients with AP, and the need for surgery or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission.Material&methodsProspective study was performed from March 2009 to August 2010 based on patients diagnosed with AP seen consecutively at a secondary hospital. The early prognostic markers used were Apache II score ≥8 and Ranson’s score ≥3, RCP>120mg/l and Ht>44% in the first 24 hours.Results131 patients were prospectively enrolled. Median age was 63 years, 60% were men. The most frequent etiology of AP was biliary (68%). Fifteen patients were admitted to the ICU (11.6%) and five (3.9%) required surgery. Twelve patients (9.2%) had necrosis on CT. Four patients (3%) died, all of them in the Severe AP group. Only hematocrit>44 was predictor of mortality in univariate analysis.Conclusionhematocrit ≥ 44% was a significant predictor of mortality. The other indicators present limitations for predicting severity, necrosis and mortality, especially in the first 24 hours.","PeriodicalId":50709,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2478/s11536-014-0503-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/s11536-014-0503-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

AbstractNone of the definitions of severity used in acute pancreatitis (AP) is ideal. Many of the scoring systems used to predict and measure its severity are complex, cumbersome and inaccurate.Aimto evaluate the usefulness of the most commonly used early markers for predicting severity, necrosis and mortality in patients with AP, and the need for surgery or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission.Material&methodsProspective study was performed from March 2009 to August 2010 based on patients diagnosed with AP seen consecutively at a secondary hospital. The early prognostic markers used were Apache II score ≥8 and Ranson’s score ≥3, RCP>120mg/l and Ht>44% in the first 24 hours.Results131 patients were prospectively enrolled. Median age was 63 years, 60% were men. The most frequent etiology of AP was biliary (68%). Fifteen patients were admitted to the ICU (11.6%) and five (3.9%) required surgery. Twelve patients (9.2%) had necrosis on CT. Four patients (3%) died, all of them in the Severe AP group. Only hematocrit>44 was predictor of mortality in univariate analysis.Conclusionhematocrit ≥ 44% was a significant predictor of mortality. The other indicators present limitations for predicting severity, necrosis and mortality, especially in the first 24 hours.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性胰腺炎严重程度的生物学标志物
摘要急性胰腺炎(AP)的严重程度定义都不理想。许多用于预测和衡量其严重程度的评分系统都是复杂、繁琐和不准确的。目的评估最常用的早期标志物在预测AP患者的严重程度、坏死和死亡率以及是否需要手术或ICU住院方面的有用性。材料与方法前瞻性研究于2009年3月至2010年8月在一家二级医院连续就诊的AP患者进行。早期预后指标为Apacheⅱ评分≥8分,Ranson评分≥3分,前24小时RCP>120mg/l, h> 44%。结果131例患者入组。中位年龄为63岁,60%为男性。AP最常见的病因是胆道(68%)。ICU收治15例(11.6%),手术5例(3.9%)。12例(9.2%)CT表现为坏死。4例(3%)患者死亡,均为重度AP组。在单变量分析中,只有血细胞比容bbbb44是死亡率的预测因子。结论红细胞压积≥44%是死亡率的重要预测因子。其他指标在预测严重程度、坏死和死亡率方面存在局限性,特别是在头24小时内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Medicine
Central European Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy amongst other Health Care Workers besides Doctors in ATBUTH Bauchi Regulation of Transport of Ca2+ NMDA-Receptors in Rat Brain Synaptosomes Under the Influence of Polyphenols Reasons Linked with COVID-19 Vaccine Taking and Tentativeness Amid Medical Doctors in ATBUTH Bauchi Nigeria Probiotic Effects on Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1