El acceso a la justicia para los consumidores en el comercio electrónico globalizado B2C. ¿Mito o realidad?

Rolando Joaquín Ortega Hernández
{"title":"El acceso a la justicia para los consumidores en el comercio electrónico globalizado B2C. ¿Mito o realidad?","authors":"Rolando Joaquín Ortega Hernández","doi":"10.24840/2182-9845_2021-0003_0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, the ubiquity of the Internet raises the need to study the behavior of consumers and users from a transnational perspective, not even placing them in a region or continent, but as an essential element of world economic development. For this reason, consumer trust in cross-border e-commerce is a challenge for many political and economic global operators. It is therefore essential to create alternative methods of conflict resolution, global and harmonized to ensure the legitimate rights of consumers and users, access to justice in the broad sense, and access to, both individually and collective effective judicial protection. In this paper the concept of access to justice will be analyzed from the perspective of the consumer in e-commerce and its materialization through the Online Dispute Resolution. In particular, the legal implications that it has for cross-border electronic commerce will be analyzed, the fact that the consumer subscribes with the buyer, arbitration clauses, prior to the emergence of the conflict, without the need to be ratified. For this reason, the alternative to a contradictory method complemented with mediation will be studied, different from arbitration but that does not undermine the rights of consumers by undermining their right to effective judicial protection.","PeriodicalId":40129,"journal":{"name":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RED-Revista Electronica de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2182-9845_2021-0003_0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, the ubiquity of the Internet raises the need to study the behavior of consumers and users from a transnational perspective, not even placing them in a region or continent, but as an essential element of world economic development. For this reason, consumer trust in cross-border e-commerce is a challenge for many political and economic global operators. It is therefore essential to create alternative methods of conflict resolution, global and harmonized to ensure the legitimate rights of consumers and users, access to justice in the broad sense, and access to, both individually and collective effective judicial protection. In this paper the concept of access to justice will be analyzed from the perspective of the consumer in e-commerce and its materialization through the Online Dispute Resolution. In particular, the legal implications that it has for cross-border electronic commerce will be analyzed, the fact that the consumer subscribes with the buyer, arbitration clauses, prior to the emergence of the conflict, without the need to be ratified. For this reason, the alternative to a contradictory method complemented with mediation will be studied, different from arbitration but that does not undermine the rights of consumers by undermining their right to effective judicial protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全球化的电子商务B2C中为消费者获得公正。神话还是现实?
今天,互联网的无处不在提出了从跨国角度研究消费者和用户行为的需要,甚至不把他们放在一个地区或大陆上,而是作为世界经济发展的一个重要因素。因此,消费者对跨境电子商务的信任是许多政治和经济全球运营商面临的挑战。因此,必须创造全球性和协调一致的解决冲突的替代方法,以确保消费者和使用者的合法权利,获得广义的司法保护,并获得个人和集体的有效司法保护。本文将从电子商务消费者的角度分析司法公正的概念,并通过网络纠纷解决将其具体化。特别是,它对跨境电子商务的法律影响将被分析,消费者订阅买方的事实,仲裁条款,在冲突出现之前,不需要得到批准。因此,将研究一种与仲裁不同但不损害消费者获得有效司法保护的权利而损害其权利的与调解相辅相成的矛盾方法的替代办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Press publishers' rights in the Digital Age: Challenges and opportunities for legal and policy frameworks Os contratos eletrónicos B2C Revisitando o tema da conversão do contrato a termo no emprego público: o acórdão do Supremo Tribunal Administrativo, de 8.09.2022 Deveres de Informação e Proteção do Consumidor Inteligência Artificial. Quadro jurídico e reflexões sobre a Proposta de Regulamento de Inteligência Artificial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1