Organ-Preserving Surgery in Urethral Cancer (a Clinical Case)

N. Kholopova, V. B. Venskel, N. Kovalenko, V. Zhavoronkova, A. I. Ivanov, A. G. Chuhnin, A. A. Klimchenko
{"title":"Organ-Preserving Surgery in Urethral Cancer (a Clinical Case)","authors":"N. Kholopova, V. B. Venskel, N. Kovalenko, V. Zhavoronkova, A. I. Ivanov, A. G. Chuhnin, A. A. Klimchenko","doi":"10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-4-323-327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Despite low incidence, malignant urethral neoplasms are among the most aggressive tumours. Prevalence of muscle-invasive and metastatic cancer at diagnosis, as well as a high relapse rate compel adherence to the most radical treatment. At the same time, the high incidence of urethral tumours in elderly and senile patients and high postoperative complication rates warrant the development of organ-preserving treatment.Aim. A case description to verify the organ-preserving treatment applicability in urethral cancer.Materials and methods. We report the treatment experience in a senile patient with concomitant chronic kidney disease at the Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary’s Oncourology Unit. Accounting for the age, concomitant pathology and tumour histology factors, a minimally invasive organ-preserving surgical intervention was performed as laparoscopic urethral resection with ureterocystoneostomy.Results and discussion. Renal function was assessed in postoperative period with dynamic nephroscintigraphy and blood creatinine monitoring. Control cysto-, ureteroscopy and contrast-enhanced CT scanning in areas of interest were performed to rule out relapse and progression.Conclusion. No report of disease relapse or progression at follow-up indicates the oncological safety of organ-preserving surgery in this patient category. Th is approach also gains support from immediate and long-term outcomes of the patient’s improved renal function and sustained good quality of life.","PeriodicalId":52846,"journal":{"name":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-4-323-327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Despite low incidence, malignant urethral neoplasms are among the most aggressive tumours. Prevalence of muscle-invasive and metastatic cancer at diagnosis, as well as a high relapse rate compel adherence to the most radical treatment. At the same time, the high incidence of urethral tumours in elderly and senile patients and high postoperative complication rates warrant the development of organ-preserving treatment.Aim. A case description to verify the organ-preserving treatment applicability in urethral cancer.Materials and methods. We report the treatment experience in a senile patient with concomitant chronic kidney disease at the Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary’s Oncourology Unit. Accounting for the age, concomitant pathology and tumour histology factors, a minimally invasive organ-preserving surgical intervention was performed as laparoscopic urethral resection with ureterocystoneostomy.Results and discussion. Renal function was assessed in postoperative period with dynamic nephroscintigraphy and blood creatinine monitoring. Control cysto-, ureteroscopy and contrast-enhanced CT scanning in areas of interest were performed to rule out relapse and progression.Conclusion. No report of disease relapse or progression at follow-up indicates the oncological safety of organ-preserving surgery in this patient category. Th is approach also gains support from immediate and long-term outcomes of the patient’s improved renal function and sustained good quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留器官手术治疗尿道癌(1例临床)
背景。尽管发病率低,恶性尿道肿瘤是最具侵袭性的肿瘤之一。肌肉侵袭性和转移性癌症在诊断时的患病率,以及高复发率迫使坚持最激进的治疗。同时,中老年患者尿道肿瘤的高发和术后并发症的高发生率,也为器官保留治疗的发展提供了必要的条件。以病例说明验证器官保留治疗在尿道癌中的适用性。材料和方法。我们报告在伏尔加格勒地区临床肿瘤药房的肿瘤学单位治疗经验老年患者合并慢性肾脏疾病。考虑到年龄、伴发病理及肿瘤组织学因素,采用微创保器官手术干预,腹腔镜尿道切除术联合输尿管膀胱造口术。结果和讨论。术后通过动态肾显像和血肌酐监测评估肾功能。对照膀胱、输尿管镜及感兴趣区域CT增强扫描排除复发和进展。在随访中没有疾病复发或进展的报告表明在这类患者中器官保留手术的肿瘤学安全性。该方法还获得了患者肾功能改善和持续良好生活质量的即时和长期结果的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Liver Cancer: a Review Clinical Cases of Successful Endoscopic Bronchial Stenting Surgical Treatment for Branched Endograft Thrombosis of the Abdominal Aorta Features of the Course of Radioinduced Breast Cancer. Clinical Observation Predictors of Multiple Primary Malignancies: Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1