{"title":"Judicial Takings and the Course Pursued","authors":"W. D. Sarratt","doi":"10.2307/3202383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ENERALLY, a line in the sand should not be crossed without considering the consequences. In Oregon, like most other states, the mean high tide line along the coast represented such a line, with private property on the upland side and public property toward the sea. In the case of State ex rel. Thornton v. Hay, however, the Oregon Supreme Court granted the public the right to cross that line for its enjoyment based on the English common law doctrine of custom, and, as a corollary, prohibited property owners from constructing any improvements on the dry sand beach between the mean high tide line and the vegetation line that might interfere with the public’s right of access. While the Oregon Supreme Court admitted that custom was doctrinally “unprecedented” in Oregon case law, the court looked to William Blackstone’s exposition of that doctrine and found, without any specific factual inquiry, that the entire Oregon coastline met the articulated requirements. Satisfied","PeriodicalId":47840,"journal":{"name":"Virginia Law Review","volume":"90 1","pages":"1487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3202383","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3202383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ENERALLY, a line in the sand should not be crossed without considering the consequences. In Oregon, like most other states, the mean high tide line along the coast represented such a line, with private property on the upland side and public property toward the sea. In the case of State ex rel. Thornton v. Hay, however, the Oregon Supreme Court granted the public the right to cross that line for its enjoyment based on the English common law doctrine of custom, and, as a corollary, prohibited property owners from constructing any improvements on the dry sand beach between the mean high tide line and the vegetation line that might interfere with the public’s right of access. While the Oregon Supreme Court admitted that custom was doctrinally “unprecedented” in Oregon case law, the court looked to William Blackstone’s exposition of that doctrine and found, without any specific factual inquiry, that the entire Oregon coastline met the articulated requirements. Satisfied
期刊介绍:
The Virginia Law Review is a journal of general legal scholarship published by the students of the University of Virginia School of Law. The continuing objective of the Virginia Law Review is to publish a professional periodical devoted to legal and law-related issues that can be of use to judges, practitioners, teachers, legislators, students, and others interested in the law. First formally organized on April 23, 1913, the Virginia Law Review today remains one of the most respected and influential student legal periodicals in the country.