Time, Change, and the Constitution

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Virginia Law Review Pub Date : 2004-10-01 DOI:10.2307/3202406
John Harrison
{"title":"Time, Change, and the Constitution","authors":"John Harrison","doi":"10.2307/3202406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HE future is hard to predict and thus hard to control. A striking example of this principle in the context of Brown v. Board of Education involves one of the central participants in that case, Justice Stanley Reed. According to some accounts, a few years after Brown was decided Justice Reed had some health troubles and was advised by his doctors that his long-term outlook was not good. In response to that advice, and possibly in order to spend what little time remained to him as pleasantly as possible, he resigned from the Supreme Court in 1957 after nineteen years of service. T","PeriodicalId":47840,"journal":{"name":"Virginia Law Review","volume":"90 1","pages":"1601"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3202406","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3202406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

HE future is hard to predict and thus hard to control. A striking example of this principle in the context of Brown v. Board of Education involves one of the central participants in that case, Justice Stanley Reed. According to some accounts, a few years after Brown was decided Justice Reed had some health troubles and was advised by his doctors that his long-term outlook was not good. In response to that advice, and possibly in order to spend what little time remained to him as pleasantly as possible, he resigned from the Supreme Court in 1957 after nineteen years of service. T
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间、变革和宪法
未来难以预测,因此也难以控制。在布朗诉教育委员会案中,这一原则的一个显著例子涉及该案的核心参与者之一,斯坦利·里德法官。根据一些说法,在布朗案被判决几年后,里德法官出现了一些健康问题,他的医生告诉他,他的长期前景并不好。作为对这个建议的回应,也可能是为了尽可能愉快地度过他所剩不多的时间,在任职19年后,他于1957年从最高法院辞职。T
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Virginia Law Review is a journal of general legal scholarship published by the students of the University of Virginia School of Law. The continuing objective of the Virginia Law Review is to publish a professional periodical devoted to legal and law-related issues that can be of use to judges, practitioners, teachers, legislators, students, and others interested in the law. First formally organized on April 23, 1913, the Virginia Law Review today remains one of the most respected and influential student legal periodicals in the country.
期刊最新文献
The God Cure: Spirituality as Therapy. Designing Business Forms to Pursue Social Goals Isolated Lambdoid Craniosynostosis. Unconstitutionally Illegitimate Discrimination Sovereign Immunity and the Constitutional Text
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1