Youtube videos as a source of information on digital indirect bonding: A content analysis.

IF 7.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.26650/eor.20231152882
Serpil Cokakoglu, Ezgi Cakir
{"title":"Youtube videos as a source of information on digital indirect bonding: A content analysis.","authors":"Serpil Cokakoglu,&nbsp;Ezgi Cakir","doi":"10.26650/eor.20231152882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate YouTube videos as a source of information for digital indirect bonding techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The keyword \"digital indirect bonding\" was first searched on YouTube, resulting in 57 recorded videos. Descriptive parameters, including source, target audience, purpose, duration, upload date, number of likes, dislikes, views, and comments, were then evaluated. After this initial assessment, the interaction index and viewing rate were calculated. Video content quality was determined using a 5-point scale that categorized videos as having poor, moderate, or good content quality. This rating was based on the presence and discussion of various topics related to digital indirect bonding, including digital scan, digital bracket placement, transfer tray production from a 3D-printed model or direct production as a 3D-printed tray, clinical application, and advantages and/or disadvantages. The videos were assessed for quality using the global quality scale (GQS) and video information and quality index (VIQI). Statistical evaluation was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Pearson correlation analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the rating reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the videos were classified as having poor content quality (41.9%), followed by moderate (38.7%) and good (19.4%) content quality. No significant differences were found between the videos in terms of descriptive parameters. However, videos with good content quality had significantly higher GQS and VIQI scores than moderate and poor content videos. The total content showed significant correlations with GQS and VIQI (r=0.780 and r=0.446, respectively; plt;0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, while the majority of YouTube videos regarding digital indirect bonding were of poor content quality, those that were of good content quality could be considered a useful source of professional information.</p>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"138-143"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20231152882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate YouTube videos as a source of information for digital indirect bonding techniques.

Materials and methods: The keyword "digital indirect bonding" was first searched on YouTube, resulting in 57 recorded videos. Descriptive parameters, including source, target audience, purpose, duration, upload date, number of likes, dislikes, views, and comments, were then evaluated. After this initial assessment, the interaction index and viewing rate were calculated. Video content quality was determined using a 5-point scale that categorized videos as having poor, moderate, or good content quality. This rating was based on the presence and discussion of various topics related to digital indirect bonding, including digital scan, digital bracket placement, transfer tray production from a 3D-printed model or direct production as a 3D-printed tray, clinical application, and advantages and/or disadvantages. The videos were assessed for quality using the global quality scale (GQS) and video information and quality index (VIQI). Statistical evaluation was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Pearson correlation analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the rating reliability.

Results: The majority of the videos were classified as having poor content quality (41.9%), followed by moderate (38.7%) and good (19.4%) content quality. No significant differences were found between the videos in terms of descriptive parameters. However, videos with good content quality had significantly higher GQS and VIQI scores than moderate and poor content videos. The total content showed significant correlations with GQS and VIQI (r=0.780 and r=0.446, respectively; plt;0.05).

Conclusion: In conclusion, while the majority of YouTube videos regarding digital indirect bonding were of poor content quality, those that were of good content quality could be considered a useful source of professional information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Youtube视频作为数字间接联系的信息来源:内容分析。
目的:本研究的目的是评估YouTube视频作为数字间接连接技术的信息来源。材料和方法:“数字间接联系”这个关键词首先在YouTube上搜索,共有57个录制的视频。然后评估描述性参数,包括来源、目标受众、目的、持续时间、上传日期、喜欢、不喜欢、浏览和评论的数量。在这一初步评估之后,计算了互动指数和观看率。视频内容质量是使用5分量表确定的,该量表将视频分类为具有较差、中等或良好的内容质量。该评级基于与数字间接粘合相关的各种主题的存在和讨论,包括数字扫描、数字支架放置、从3D打印模型生产转移托盘或直接生产为3D打印托盘、临床应用以及优点和/或缺点。使用全球质量量表(GQS)和视频信息和质量指数(VIQI)对视频进行质量评估。使用Kruskal-Wallis、卡方和Pearson相关分析进行统计评估,并计算组内相关系数以确定评级可靠性。结果:大多数视频的内容质量较差(41.9%),其次是中等(38.7%)和良好(19.4%)。在描述参数方面,两个视频之间没有发现显著差异。然而,内容质量好的视频的GQS和VIQI得分明显高于内容质量中等和较差的视频。总内容与GQS和VIQI显著相关(分别为r=0.780和r=0.446;plt;0.05)。结论:总之,尽管大多数关于数字间接连接的YouTube视频内容质量较差,但内容质量良好的视频可以被视为专业信息的有用来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
2017
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.
期刊最新文献
In-situ selective leaching and closed-loop recovery from waste LiFePO4 batteries by reusable succinic acid Efficient removal of perchlorate by a quaternary ammonium-functionalized hydrogel: Performance and mechanisms Tailoring wood-based activated carbons and assessing the role of impregnation and O₂ for efficient H₂S removal from biogas Novel surface-reconstructed CoZn oxyphosphate electrodes for efficient conversion of polylactic acid hydrolysate to acetic acid Lithium slag-synthesized zeolite-based catalyst induces electron transfer: Used in tetracycline degradation to produce pentatoxic organic compounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1