Pacienta autonomijas un integritātes aizsardzība tiesību aktos

Aldis Lieljuksis
{"title":"Pacienta autonomijas un integritātes aizsardzība tiesību aktos","authors":"Aldis Lieljuksis","doi":"10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vairākās Eiropas valstīs – Polijā, Portugālē un Lihtenšteinā – paredzēta kriminālatbildība ne tikai par pacientam nodarītu kaitējumu veselības aprūpē, bet arī tad, ja ārstniecība veikta bez pacienta piekrišanas situācijās, kad tā bija nepieciešama, jo tādējādi ir prettiesiski aizskartas cilvēka pamattiesības. Pētījums veikts, lai noskaidrotu, kādās Latvijas Republikas Satversmes VIII nodaļas tiesību normās tiek garantēta personas autonomija un integritāte kā cilvēka pamattiesību neatņemama vērtība, kā arī ielasāma pacienta informētā piekrišana kā pacienta galvenais līdzeklis šo aizsargājamo interešu nodrošināšanā. Several European countries, for instance, Poland, Portugal and Liechtenstein, provide for criminal liability not only for harm to a patient in healthcare but also for treatment without the patient’s consent in situations where it was necessary because of an unlawful violation of fundamental rights. The study was conducted to find out which legal norms of Chapter VIII of the Satversme (the Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia guarantee autonomy and integrity of a person, as an integral value of fundamental human rights, as well as the patient’s informed consent as the patient’s main means of ensuring these protected interests. Whether the protection of these interests is sufficiently effective or should also be provided for in a separate provision of the Criminal Law will be clarified in another study.","PeriodicalId":34542,"journal":{"name":"Socrates","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socrates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vairākās Eiropas valstīs – Polijā, Portugālē un Lihtenšteinā – paredzēta kriminālatbildība ne tikai par pacientam nodarītu kaitējumu veselības aprūpē, bet arī tad, ja ārstniecība veikta bez pacienta piekrišanas situācijās, kad tā bija nepieciešama, jo tādējādi ir prettiesiski aizskartas cilvēka pamattiesības. Pētījums veikts, lai noskaidrotu, kādās Latvijas Republikas Satversmes VIII nodaļas tiesību normās tiek garantēta personas autonomija un integritāte kā cilvēka pamattiesību neatņemama vērtība, kā arī ielasāma pacienta informētā piekrišana kā pacienta galvenais līdzeklis šo aizsargājamo interešu nodrošināšanā. Several European countries, for instance, Poland, Portugal and Liechtenstein, provide for criminal liability not only for harm to a patient in healthcare but also for treatment without the patient’s consent in situations where it was necessary because of an unlawful violation of fundamental rights. The study was conducted to find out which legal norms of Chapter VIII of the Satversme (the Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia guarantee autonomy and integrity of a person, as an integral value of fundamental human rights, as well as the patient’s informed consent as the patient’s main means of ensuring these protected interests. Whether the protection of these interests is sufficiently effective or should also be provided for in a separate provision of the Criminal Law will be clarified in another study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立法保护患者自主性和完整性
在波兰、葡萄牙和列支敦士登等一些欧洲国家,不仅对患者在医疗保健中遭受的伤害承担刑事责任,而且在必要的情况下未经患者同意进行治疗,这就是基本人权受到非法影响的原因。波兰等几个欧洲国家已接受调查,以澄清拉脱维亚共和国《宪法》第八章规定的人的自主权和完整性是基本人权的一个组成价值,并将患者的知情同意视为确保保护这些受保护利益的一个关键工具,葡萄牙和列支敦士登不仅规定了在医疗保健中对患者造成伤害的刑事责任,还规定了在因非法侵犯基本权利而有必要的情况下未经患者同意进行治疗的刑事责任。进行这项研究的目的是了解拉脱维亚共和国《宪法》第八章中的哪些法律规范保障人的自主性和完整性,这是基本人权的一个组成价值,以及患者的知情同意,作为患者确保这些受保护利益的主要手段。对这些利益的保护是否足够有效,或者是否也应在《刑法》的单独条款中作出规定,将在另一项研究中予以澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
The importance of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union with a special focus on countering EU threats and crime more effectively Role of medical practitioners in prevention and investigation of violence against children, and need to strengthen interdisciplinary cooperation in Latvia Crime Forecasting in the Digital Age: A Theoretical Framework The Legal Nature of Patient Duties Effective Application of Provisional Measures under the Brussels Ibis Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1