Revolución en los campos: La reinterpretación de la Revolución Agrícola inglesa

IF 0.4 4区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Historia Agraria Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI:10.26754/UZ.84-7733-729-2
Rupert C. Allen
{"title":"Revolución en los campos: La reinterpretación de la Revolución Agrícola inglesa","authors":"Rupert C. Allen","doi":"10.26754/UZ.84-7733-729-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our understanding of the open fields and enclosures has been revolutionised in recent decades. A wide range of research has shown that yeomen farmers and small holders peasants were capable of innovation, and the open fields witnessed most of the output and productivity growth achieved by English agriculture from the Middle Ages to around 1750. Parliamentary enclosures increased landlord and gentry income, but often failed to produce much extra output or release much labour from 1750 onwards. The first steps of the new understanding arose from statistical comparisons and regression analysis rather than from the documentary data used to support the standard approach. But the case for the progressiveness of the open fields can also be built in traditional sources.","PeriodicalId":44719,"journal":{"name":"Historia Agraria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia Agraria","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/UZ.84-7733-729-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Our understanding of the open fields and enclosures has been revolutionised in recent decades. A wide range of research has shown that yeomen farmers and small holders peasants were capable of innovation, and the open fields witnessed most of the output and productivity growth achieved by English agriculture from the Middle Ages to around 1750. Parliamentary enclosures increased landlord and gentry income, but often failed to produce much extra output or release much labour from 1750 onwards. The first steps of the new understanding arose from statistical comparisons and regression analysis rather than from the documentary data used to support the standard approach. But the case for the progressiveness of the open fields can also be built in traditional sources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村革命:对英国农业革命的重新诠释
近几十年来,我们对开放领域和围栏的理解发生了革命性的变化。广泛的研究表明,自耕农和小农具有创新能力,从中世纪到1750年左右,英国农业的大部分产出和生产力增长都是在开阔的田野上实现的。议会圈地增加了地主和贵族的收入,但从1750年开始,往往无法产生更多的额外产出或释放大量劳动力。新理解的第一步来自统计比较和回归分析,而不是来自用于支持标准方法的文献数据。但是,开放油田的先进性也可以建立在传统来源的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Historia Agraria
Historia Agraria Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de agricultura e historia rural es una publicación cuatrimestral en lengua castellana especializada en historia de la agricultura, la economía y la sociedad rural. Su objetivo es difundir las investigaciones relativas a la historia agraria en todos los periodos y campos de interés para los especialistas. Los temas cubren aspectos empíricos, teóricos y metodológicos, que serán publicados en las secciones correspondientes de Debates, Estados de la cuestión, Estudios y Notas de investigación.
期刊最新文献
«Como son obligados de inmemorial tiempo a esta parte»: Una historia de larga duración de los comunales en las aldeas de Casaio y Lardeira (siglos X-XVIII) Appendix: Rural migration and agricultural modernization. An analysis of provincial Spain during its great rural exodus, 1960–1981 Appendix: The water culture of the Order of Christ in the making of a self-sufficient and sustainable hydric system La soberanía alimentaria como indicador de la transformación integral de los sistemas agroalimentarios Book reviews - Crítica de libros - Crítica de livros (Historia Agraria, 89)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1