Evaluation of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among medical students

Pallavi Panchu, Biju Bahuleyan, K. Seethalakshmi, Tom Thomas
{"title":"Evaluation of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among medical students","authors":"Pallavi Panchu, Biju Bahuleyan, K. Seethalakshmi, Tom Thomas","doi":"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I3.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background- Medical students are expected to be skilled readers and continuous learners. For a lifelong learner, metacognitive awareness of reading strategy is a necessary skill to obtain good academic outcome. The present study was done to evaluate the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of first year medical students. Aims: To analyze the overall metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and also the subscales like global reading strategies, problem solving and support reading strategies in first year medical students and the impact of gender on these. Methods: Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory (MARSI), a validated tool was administered to all the willing participants of the study group. The data obtained was analyzed using chi square and paired t test. Results: The overall metacognitive awareness of reading strategies was found to be high in our students. Problem solving strategies was utilized most followed by support reading strategies and global reading strategies. On comparing the influence of the sexes, it was noticed that females use better overall reading strategies which was significant. On comparing subscales, both the genders prefer using problem solving skills while the other subscales are used more by females. Conclusion: From our study we conclude that our learners have good metacognitive awareness regarding reading skills but does the skill turn into practice to achieve good academic scores remains to be seen. We suggest that curriculum should be so designed to help the students use all the subscales and hence all the strategies to become effective learners. Key words: MARCI, Medical students, Global strategies, Problem solving strategies, Support reading strategies.","PeriodicalId":17001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","volume":"4 1","pages":"198-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I3.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background- Medical students are expected to be skilled readers and continuous learners. For a lifelong learner, metacognitive awareness of reading strategy is a necessary skill to obtain good academic outcome. The present study was done to evaluate the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of first year medical students. Aims: To analyze the overall metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and also the subscales like global reading strategies, problem solving and support reading strategies in first year medical students and the impact of gender on these. Methods: Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory (MARSI), a validated tool was administered to all the willing participants of the study group. The data obtained was analyzed using chi square and paired t test. Results: The overall metacognitive awareness of reading strategies was found to be high in our students. Problem solving strategies was utilized most followed by support reading strategies and global reading strategies. On comparing the influence of the sexes, it was noticed that females use better overall reading strategies which was significant. On comparing subscales, both the genders prefer using problem solving skills while the other subscales are used more by females. Conclusion: From our study we conclude that our learners have good metacognitive awareness regarding reading skills but does the skill turn into practice to achieve good academic scores remains to be seen. We suggest that curriculum should be so designed to help the students use all the subscales and hence all the strategies to become effective learners. Key words: MARCI, Medical students, Global strategies, Problem solving strategies, Support reading strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生阅读策略元认知意识的评价
背景-医学生被期望成为熟练的读者和持续的学习者。对于终身学习者来说,阅读策略的元认知意识是获得良好学习成绩的必要技能。本研究旨在评估医学生对阅读策略的元认知意识。目的:分析医学生对阅读策略的整体元认知意识、整体阅读策略、问题解决策略和支持阅读策略的子量表以及性别对这些子量表的影响。方法:对研究对象进行阅读策略元认知意识量表(MARSI)测试。所得资料采用卡方检验和配对t检验进行分析。结果:我校学生对阅读策略的元认知意识总体较高。学生使用最多的是问题解决策略,其次是辅助阅读策略和全局阅读策略。在比较性别的影响时,我们注意到女性使用更好的整体阅读策略,这是显著的。在比较子量表上,男女都更倾向于使用解决问题的能力,而其他子量表则被女性更多地使用。结论:从我们的研究中我们得出结论,我们的学习者在阅读技能方面具有良好的元认知意识,但这种技能是否转化为实践以取得良好的学习成绩还有待观察。我们建议课程的设计应该帮助学生使用所有的子量表,从而成为有效的学习者。关键词:MARCI,医学生,全局策略,问题解决策略,支持阅读策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simulation-Based Training in Basic Surgical Skills: Experiences from A Repeat Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia Referral Patterns of Paediatricians and General Medical Practitioners to Paediatric Dental Clinics and Oral Health Knowledge in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey The Effect of Dairy Products Intake on Dental Caries across Adolescent Females in Al Thahab Al Abyedh Village Baghdad The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction in selected colleges at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia The Relationship between Spiritual Well-being and Family Cohesion in Patients with Thalassemia Major
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1