A study on hypertension and comparability between one reading and average of three readings of blood pressure by mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in a slum of Kolkata
N. Karmakar, Saugat Banerjee, Amiya Das, A. Dasgupta, Mahul Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"A study on hypertension and comparability between one reading and average of three readings of blood pressure by mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in a slum of Kolkata","authors":"N. Karmakar, Saugat Banerjee, Amiya Das, A. Dasgupta, Mahul Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hypertension, a major chronic lifestyle disease is most prevalent non communicable disease inIndia. Blood pressure (BP) measurements in the community are generally performed with a mercurysphygmomanometer. However, it is the common teaching that average of at least three readings of bloodpressure measurement is considered to be the gold-standard method. How far this is true has been determinedin this study with the Aim: To find out the prevalence of hypertension and compare the one reading of bloodpressure taken by mercury sphygmomanometer with average of three such readings. Materials andMethods:This cross-sectional study was conducted from January-March 2015 among 160 adults of Chetla slum, Kolkatachosen through a two stage sample design. ubjects included -Male: 39.4%; Female: 60.6%. Data was collectedby interview and blood pressure measurements. Comparison was made between the first reading and theaverage of three readings of BP taken by mercury sphygmomanometer. Result: The overall prevalence ofhypertension was found to be 30 % (48). Strength of agreement between first reading of Blood Pressure with thatof average reading was excellent, with kappa=0.940. Conclusion: Though the average of three blood pressurereadings according to Standard operation Procedure is considered ideal for accurate Blood Pressuremeasurement it may not always be feasible to undertake such a practice especially at community level. Thisstudy observes that single reading can safely be considered for Blood Pressure measurement instead of averageof three readings. Key words: Blood Pressure measurement, One reading, Average of three readings, Mercury sphygmomanometer, Slum.","PeriodicalId":17001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","volume":"4 1","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24896/JRMDS.V4I4.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hypertension, a major chronic lifestyle disease is most prevalent non communicable disease inIndia. Blood pressure (BP) measurements in the community are generally performed with a mercurysphygmomanometer. However, it is the common teaching that average of at least three readings of bloodpressure measurement is considered to be the gold-standard method. How far this is true has been determinedin this study with the Aim: To find out the prevalence of hypertension and compare the one reading of bloodpressure taken by mercury sphygmomanometer with average of three such readings. Materials andMethods:This cross-sectional study was conducted from January-March 2015 among 160 adults of Chetla slum, Kolkatachosen through a two stage sample design. ubjects included -Male: 39.4%; Female: 60.6%. Data was collectedby interview and blood pressure measurements. Comparison was made between the first reading and theaverage of three readings of BP taken by mercury sphygmomanometer. Result: The overall prevalence ofhypertension was found to be 30 % (48). Strength of agreement between first reading of Blood Pressure with thatof average reading was excellent, with kappa=0.940. Conclusion: Though the average of three blood pressurereadings according to Standard operation Procedure is considered ideal for accurate Blood Pressuremeasurement it may not always be feasible to undertake such a practice especially at community level. Thisstudy observes that single reading can safely be considered for Blood Pressure measurement instead of averageof three readings. Key words: Blood Pressure measurement, One reading, Average of three readings, Mercury sphygmomanometer, Slum.