ReMembering the Sentence

IF 0.5 0 LITERATURE COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION Pub Date : 2003-06-01 DOI:10.2307/3594187
S. Myers
{"title":"ReMembering the Sentence","authors":"S. Myers","doi":"10.2307/3594187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article echoes Robert J. Connors's call for a reexamination of sentence pedagogies in composition teaching and offers an explanation of the unsolved mystery of why sentence combining improves student writing, using insights provided by work in contemporary research in linguistics and in language processing. Based the same insights, I argue that we invite words and phrases, the true members of sentences, to important positions in writing classes and describe practical methods for doing so. I deeply appreciated RobertJ. Connors's article \"The Erasure of the Sentence\" published in College Composition and Communication in fall 2000. It was not only a thoughtful look at sentence-based pedagogies but a clear and muchneeded historical analysis of their curious eclipse. I have always wondered why, pedagogically, acknowledging the importance of writing sentences is so often construed as diminishing the importance of other levels of discourse. While I have taught both graduate and undergraduate U.S. students, most of my work as a composition teacher has been with international students who come through university ESL classes or who come for help writing theses and dissertations. In teaching ESL composition, the devaluation of the sentence as a locus of instruction is particularly surreal. It has been as though \"process\" somehow precludes the immediate process most central to translating thoughts","PeriodicalId":47107,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION","volume":"54 1","pages":"610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/3594187","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3594187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This article echoes Robert J. Connors's call for a reexamination of sentence pedagogies in composition teaching and offers an explanation of the unsolved mystery of why sentence combining improves student writing, using insights provided by work in contemporary research in linguistics and in language processing. Based the same insights, I argue that we invite words and phrases, the true members of sentences, to important positions in writing classes and describe practical methods for doing so. I deeply appreciated RobertJ. Connors's article "The Erasure of the Sentence" published in College Composition and Communication in fall 2000. It was not only a thoughtful look at sentence-based pedagogies but a clear and muchneeded historical analysis of their curious eclipse. I have always wondered why, pedagogically, acknowledging the importance of writing sentences is so often construed as diminishing the importance of other levels of discourse. While I have taught both graduate and undergraduate U.S. students, most of my work as a composition teacher has been with international students who come through university ESL classes or who come for help writing theses and dissertations. In teaching ESL composition, the devaluation of the sentence as a locus of instruction is particularly surreal. It has been as though "process" somehow precludes the immediate process most central to translating thoughts
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记住句子
本文回应了罗伯特·康纳斯(Robert J. Connors)关于在作文教学中重新审视句子教学法的呼吁,并利用当代语言学和语言处理研究工作提供的见解,解释了为什么句子组合能提高学生写作的未解之谜。基于同样的见解,我认为我们应该让单词和短语——句子的真正成员——在写作课上占据重要位置,并描述这样做的实用方法。我非常感谢罗伯特。康纳斯的文章“句子的擦除”发表在2000年秋季的《大学作文与交流》上。这本书不仅对基于句子的教学法进行了深思熟虑的审视,而且对其奇特的衰落进行了清晰而急需的历史分析。我一直想知道,为什么在教学上,承认写作句子的重要性经常被解释为贬低其他层次话语的重要性。虽然我教过美国的研究生和本科生,但作为一名作文老师,我的大部分工作都是教那些参加大学ESL课程的国际学生,或者是来帮助他们写论文和学位论文的学生。在英语写作教学中,句子作为教学场所的贬值现象尤为离奇。似乎“过程”在某种程度上排除了翻译思想最核心的直接过程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: College Composition and Communication publishes research and scholarship in rhetoric and composition studies that supports college teachers in reflecting on and improving their practices in teaching writing and that reflects the most current scholarship and theory in the field.
期刊最新文献
CCCC News Thinking about Feeling: The Roles of Emotion in Reflective Writing The Student-Podcaster as Narrator of Social Change? Announcements and Calls The Virtual Writing Marathon Ecosystem: Writing, Community, and Emotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1