Husserl and Merleau Ponty: The Affective Bodily Experience of Architectural Space

Irene Breuer
{"title":"Husserl and Merleau Ponty: The Affective Bodily Experience of Architectural Space","authors":"Irene Breuer","doi":"10.2478/gth-2020-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary This paper deals with the development of Husserl’s and Merleau-Pontys analyses of the affective lived experience of body and space. Both the concept of „flesh“ (Merleau-Ponty) and „Hyle“ (Husserl) stand for a sensuous principle that underlies the original givenness and solidarity of body and world and I claim that this interaction and the concomitant intertwining of body and place make up the existential dimension of architecture, i.e. the, being-here-in-a-place’. In this connection, I argue that the fact that bodily affective experience endows the world with sense has led to a double break: On the one hand with representation and on the other with perspectivity and compossibility of the realms of being in Husserl’s and Merleau-Ponty’s respective approaches. Finally, I will exemplify this break and the development of genetic insights – from an anthropocentric, organic and harmonious space conception to a topologic space made up of incompossibilities expressing an ambiguous sense – with paradigmatic works of architecture, so as to make evident the explanatory potential of phenomenology for architecture.","PeriodicalId":33799,"journal":{"name":"Gestalt Theory","volume":"42 1","pages":"287 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestalt Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2020-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Summary This paper deals with the development of Husserl’s and Merleau-Pontys analyses of the affective lived experience of body and space. Both the concept of „flesh“ (Merleau-Ponty) and „Hyle“ (Husserl) stand for a sensuous principle that underlies the original givenness and solidarity of body and world and I claim that this interaction and the concomitant intertwining of body and place make up the existential dimension of architecture, i.e. the, being-here-in-a-place’. In this connection, I argue that the fact that bodily affective experience endows the world with sense has led to a double break: On the one hand with representation and on the other with perspectivity and compossibility of the realms of being in Husserl’s and Merleau-Ponty’s respective approaches. Finally, I will exemplify this break and the development of genetic insights – from an anthropocentric, organic and harmonious space conception to a topologic space made up of incompossibilities expressing an ambiguous sense – with paradigmatic works of architecture, so as to make evident the explanatory potential of phenomenology for architecture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胡塞尔与梅洛·庞蒂:建筑空间的情感身体体验
本文论述了胡塞尔和梅洛-庞蒂对身体和空间的情感生活经验分析的发展。“肉体”(梅洛-庞蒂)和“Hyle”(胡塞尔)的概念都代表了一种感性原则,这种原则是身体和世界的原始给予和团结的基础,我认为这种相互作用以及身体和地方的伴随交织构成了建筑的存在维度,即“在这里在一个地方”。在这方面,我认为,身体情感经验赋予世界以感觉的事实导致了双重中断:一方面是再现,另一方面是胡塞尔和梅洛-庞蒂各自方法中存在领域的透视图和兼容性。最后,我将举例说明这种突破和遗传见解的发展-从人类中心,有机和和谐的空间概念到由表达模糊意义的不可能组成的拓扑空间-与建筑的范例作品,从而表明现象学对建筑的解释潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elders’ experience with augmented gaze: preliminary observations Obituary for Michael Wertheimer (1927 - 2022) Reconstructed multisensoriality. Reading The Catcher in the Rye Nachruf auf Michael Wertheimer (1927 - 2022) Language and Speech as Open, Context-dependent Wholes. A view from Prague
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1