Types, Styles, and Spaces of Possibility : Phenomenology and Musical Improvisation

Mitchell Atkinson
{"title":"Types, Styles, and Spaces of Possibility : Phenomenology and Musical Improvisation","authors":"Mitchell Atkinson","doi":"10.2478/gth-2020-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary I outline an approach to the phenomenology of improvised music which takes typification and the development of multi‐ordered phenomenological structures as central. My approach here is firmly in line with classical Husserlian phenomenology, taking the discussion of types in Experience and Judgment (Husserl, 1973) and Brudzińska (2015) as guide. I provide a phenomenological analysis of musical types as they are found in improvisational contexts, focusing on jazz in the 20th century. Styles are higher‐order musical types. Musical types are structures that are temporally “thick,” relying on sedimented typification and knowledge, driving expectations as definitional. In most forms of music (including improvised music), musical styles involve maintaining a balance between confirming expectations and flouting expectations. I show that improvised music has a phenomenal structure which is enriched by the communicative and “ real‐time” nature of improvised music. Improvised music can be seen as an exploration of a possibility space rendered by the juxtaposition of the musical types afforded by a performance environment (instrumentation, harmonic and melodic traditions, etc.). I show that improvisation in music is a multi‐vectoral form of communication. The communication is founded in what Dieter Lohmar calls “non‐linguistic thinking.” The expression is constituted in the results of active and synthesis. The culmination of improvisational exploration of possibility spaces is the precisification and enrichment of styles‐as‐types, while in some cases developing new styles in the process.","PeriodicalId":33799,"journal":{"name":"Gestalt Theory","volume":"42 1","pages":"253 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestalt Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2020-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary I outline an approach to the phenomenology of improvised music which takes typification and the development of multi‐ordered phenomenological structures as central. My approach here is firmly in line with classical Husserlian phenomenology, taking the discussion of types in Experience and Judgment (Husserl, 1973) and Brudzińska (2015) as guide. I provide a phenomenological analysis of musical types as they are found in improvisational contexts, focusing on jazz in the 20th century. Styles are higher‐order musical types. Musical types are structures that are temporally “thick,” relying on sedimented typification and knowledge, driving expectations as definitional. In most forms of music (including improvised music), musical styles involve maintaining a balance between confirming expectations and flouting expectations. I show that improvised music has a phenomenal structure which is enriched by the communicative and “ real‐time” nature of improvised music. Improvised music can be seen as an exploration of a possibility space rendered by the juxtaposition of the musical types afforded by a performance environment (instrumentation, harmonic and melodic traditions, etc.). I show that improvisation in music is a multi‐vectoral form of communication. The communication is founded in what Dieter Lohmar calls “non‐linguistic thinking.” The expression is constituted in the results of active and synthesis. The culmination of improvisational exploration of possibility spaces is the precisification and enrichment of styles‐as‐types, while in some cases developing new styles in the process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类型、风格与可能性空间:现象学与音乐即兴
我概述了一种研究即兴音乐现象学的方法,该方法以类型化和多阶现象学结构的发展为中心。我在这里的方法与经典胡塞尔现象学完全一致,以《经验与判断》(胡塞尔,1973)和Brudzińska(2015)中关于类型的讨论为指导。我提供了一种现象学分析的音乐类型,因为他们是在即兴环境中发现的,重点是在20世纪的爵士乐。风格是高阶音乐类型。音乐类型是暂时“厚实”的结构,依赖于沉淀的类型和知识,驱动期望作为定义。在大多数形式的音乐(包括即兴音乐)中,音乐风格需要在确认期望和蔑视期望之间保持平衡。我表明,即兴音乐具有一种现象级的结构,这种结构被即兴音乐的交流和“实时”性质所丰富。即兴音乐可以被看作是对表演环境(乐器、和声和旋律传统等)所提供的音乐类型并置所呈现的可能性空间的探索。我展示了音乐中的即兴创作是一种多向量的交流形式。这种交流建立在Dieter Lohmar所说的“非语言思维”之上。表达是在主动和综合的结果中构成的。对可能性空间的即兴探索的高潮是风格-类型的精确和丰富,而在某些情况下,在这个过程中开发了新的风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elders’ experience with augmented gaze: preliminary observations Obituary for Michael Wertheimer (1927 - 2022) Reconstructed multisensoriality. Reading The Catcher in the Rye Nachruf auf Michael Wertheimer (1927 - 2022) Language and Speech as Open, Context-dependent Wholes. A view from Prague
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1