Fixing Ethical Rules for Midwives in the Early Roman Imperial Period: Soranus, ‘Gynaecia’ I 3–4

Ecca Giulia
{"title":"Fixing Ethical Rules for Midwives in the Early Roman Imperial Period: Soranus, ‘Gynaecia’ I 3–4","authors":"Ecca Giulia","doi":"10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first two chapters of Soranus of Ephesus’ ‘Gynaecia’ (first c. AD) include ethical rules for the ideal midwife. These rules show striking analogies with the content of the deontological works of the Corpus Hippocraticum (‘Iusiurandum’, ‘Lex’, ‘Testamentum’, ‘De decenti habitu’, ‘Praecepta’ and ‘De medico’). In this paper, I shall for the first time detect, explore and comment on these analogies. From the detailed examination of the texts, it emerges that at the beginning of the Roman Imperial Period a common ethical model for both the ideal physician and the ideal midwife was probably circulating. This ethical model contributed to fix the ethical rules for physicians and midwives transmitted in the writing by Soranus as well as in the texts attributed to Hippocrates.","PeriodicalId":76565,"journal":{"name":"Sudhoffs Archiv","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sudhoffs Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/sudhoff-2017-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The first two chapters of Soranus of Ephesus’ ‘Gynaecia’ (first c. AD) include ethical rules for the ideal midwife. These rules show striking analogies with the content of the deontological works of the Corpus Hippocraticum (‘Iusiurandum’, ‘Lex’, ‘Testamentum’, ‘De decenti habitu’, ‘Praecepta’ and ‘De medico’). In this paper, I shall for the first time detect, explore and comment on these analogies. From the detailed examination of the texts, it emerges that at the beginning of the Roman Imperial Period a common ethical model for both the ideal physician and the ideal midwife was probably circulating. This ethical model contributed to fix the ethical rules for physicians and midwives transmitted in the writing by Soranus as well as in the texts attributed to Hippocrates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修复早期罗马帝国时期助产士的伦理规则:Soranus, ' gynecia ' I 3-4
以弗所的索拉努斯的“妇科”(公元前c)的前两章包括理想的助产士的伦理规则。这些规则与《希波克拉底文集》(Corpus hippo克拉底文集)的义务论著作(“Iusiurandum”、“Lex”、“Testamentum”、“De decenti habitu”、“Praecepta”和“De medico”)的内容有着惊人的相似之处。在本文中,我将首次发现、探索和评论这些类比。从对文本的详细研究中可以看出,在罗马帝国时期初期,一种理想医生和理想助产士的共同伦理模式可能正在流传。这一伦理模式有助于确定医生和助产士的伦理规则,这些规则在索拉努斯的著作以及希波克拉底的著作中得到了传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
„Es besteht hier immer Bedarf an frischen Embryonen.“ Sigismund Schnitzer (ca. 1560/65–1622) Die Entwicklung des Menschen Wirbelsäule und Becken in den Anatomieblättern von Leonardo da Vinci „ob der wundt mensch sterb oder genesen moͤge“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1