Zakaz praktyk nieuczciwie wykorzystujących przewagę kontraktową jako reguła kontraktowa przy zawieraniu umów z rolnikami

Michał Hejbudzki
{"title":"Zakaz praktyk nieuczciwie wykorzystujących przewagę kontraktową jako reguła kontraktowa przy zawieraniu umów z rolnikami","authors":"Michał Hejbudzki","doi":"10.25167/osap.1176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing legal instruments in the area of trade in agricultural and food products in Poland were considered by the Polish legislature to be insufficient, which was an impetus for legislative work finalized by the adoption of the act on counteracting the unfair use of contractual advantage in the trade in agricultural and food products on 15 December 2016. The purpose of the research described in the article was to determine the normative dimension of the concept of unfair use of contractual advantage and the assessment of admissibility de lege lata for farmers to rely on protection under the provisions of the aforementioned Act of 2016. The analyses have led to the conclusion that the ban on practices of unfair use of contractual advantage should be seen as a new, not yet crystallized, contract rule applicable to concluding contracts specified in this act, including contracts with farmers.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.1176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing legal instruments in the area of trade in agricultural and food products in Poland were considered by the Polish legislature to be insufficient, which was an impetus for legislative work finalized by the adoption of the act on counteracting the unfair use of contractual advantage in the trade in agricultural and food products on 15 December 2016. The purpose of the research described in the article was to determine the normative dimension of the concept of unfair use of contractual advantage and the assessment of admissibility de lege lata for farmers to rely on protection under the provisions of the aforementioned Act of 2016. The analyses have led to the conclusion that the ban on practices of unfair use of contractual advantage should be seen as a new, not yet crystallized, contract rule applicable to concluding contracts specified in this act, including contracts with farmers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
禁止在与农民签订合同时利用合同优势作为合同规则的不公平做法
波兰立法机构认为,波兰农产品和食品贸易领域的现有法律文书不足,这推动了立法工作,并于2016年12月15日通过了《关于在农产品和食品贸易中不公平使用合同优势的法案》。文章中描述的研究目的是确定不公平使用合同优势概念的规范维度,以及评估农民依赖上述2016年法案规定的保护的现行法律可采性。这些分析得出的结论是,禁止不公平利用合同优势的做法应被视为一项新的、尚未明确的合同规则,适用于订立本法所规定的合同,包括与农民签订的合同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The need for protection of environmental defenders from digital intimidation: an analysis of Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention An Economic Analysis of Iran’s 2017 Judicial System Reforms: Ways with Long-term Effects to Improve Judicial System’s Litigation Delay Access to justice regarding plans and programmes related to the environment – Polish law in the light of Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention Wolność gospodarcza i jej ograniczenia na tle różnych modeli ekonomicznych Zakaz wydawania wiążących poleceń przez radę nadzorczą zarządowi spółki z o.o.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1