Sektor mięsny odpowiada za istotną część antropogenicznych gazów cieplarnianychi bez jego transformacji nie jest możliwe zatrzymanie zmian klimatu. Najłatwiejszymsposobem zmniejszenia emisyjności sektora mięsnego jest zmiana modelu konsumpcji mięsa,do czego mogą się przyczyniać reklamy lub innego rodzaju promocje. Zgodnie z art. 80 ustawy Prawo ochrony środowiska promocja towarów i usług propagująca model konsumpcjisprzeczny z zasadami ochrony środowiska i zrównoważonego rozwoju jest zakazana.Promocje mięsa czerwonego zdają się wypełniać wszystkie przesłanki powyższego przepisu.W celu weryfikacji tej tezy niniejsza publikacja dokonuje szczegółowej analizy przesłanekzakazu reklamy nieekologicznej, odnosząc go do promocji mięsa czerwonego. Głównymcelem publikacji jest dokonanie wykładni art. 80 ustawy Prawo ochrony środowiska, któramoże być wykorzystana do przeciwdziałania najbardziej szkodliwym przejawom ludzkiejdziałalności.
{"title":"Wykładnia art. 80 ustawy – Prawo ochrony środowiska w kontekście promocji mięsa","authors":"Franciszek Nowak","doi":"10.25167/osap.4989","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4989","url":null,"abstract":"Sektor mięsny odpowiada za istotną część antropogenicznych gazów cieplarnianychi bez jego transformacji nie jest możliwe zatrzymanie zmian klimatu. Najłatwiejszymsposobem zmniejszenia emisyjności sektora mięsnego jest zmiana modelu konsumpcji mięsa,do czego mogą się przyczyniać reklamy lub innego rodzaju promocje. Zgodnie z art. 80 ustawy Prawo ochrony środowiska promocja towarów i usług propagująca model konsumpcjisprzeczny z zasadami ochrony środowiska i zrównoważonego rozwoju jest zakazana.Promocje mięsa czerwonego zdają się wypełniać wszystkie przesłanki powyższego przepisu.W celu weryfikacji tej tezy niniejsza publikacja dokonuje szczegółowej analizy przesłanekzakazu reklamy nieekologicznej, odnosząc go do promocji mięsa czerwonego. Głównymcelem publikacji jest dokonanie wykładni art. 80 ustawy Prawo ochrony środowiska, któramoże być wykorzystana do przeciwdziałania najbardziej szkodliwym przejawom ludzkiejdziałalności.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48162123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite being a major environmental issue, marine pollution of onshore origin has not been addressed through a clear and coherent international legal framework. The aim of this article is, therefore, to reconduct such fragmented framework to a single international rule, with the potential of effectively facing the issue. This led the investigation to focus on the Principle of Prevention, which, despite being a cornerstone of international environmental law, has remained quite evanescent as to its normative content. With this in mind, the article attempts to reconstruct the actual content of the rule with specific regard to the issue at stake. In order to do so, it has been essential to identify the standard of “diligence” States are held to in such regard and to verify how such “due diligence” interacts with the primary rule and contributes to fill it with normative content. The result is a single legal rule with a renewed potential, especially in terms of enforcement opportunities.
{"title":"Application of the Principle of Prevention to land-based sources of marine pollution: an International Law approach","authors":"F. Maletto","doi":"10.25167/osap.4867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4867","url":null,"abstract":"Despite being a major environmental issue, marine pollution of onshore origin has not been addressed through a clear and coherent international legal framework. The aim of this article is, therefore, to reconduct such fragmented framework to a single international rule, with the potential of effectively facing the issue. This led the investigation to focus on the Principle of Prevention, which, despite being a cornerstone of international environmental law, has remained quite evanescent as to its normative content. With this in mind, the article attempts to reconstruct the actual content of the rule with specific regard to the issue at stake. In order to do so, it has been essential to identify the standard of “diligence” States are held to in such regard and to verify how such “due diligence” interacts with the primary rule and contributes to fill it with normative content. The result is a single legal rule with a renewed potential, especially in terms of enforcement opportunities.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45709024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zasadą wpisaną w Konstytucję Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej jest gwarancja wolności gospodarczej, będącej jednocześnie podstawą gospodarki rynkowej, na którą ograniczenia mogą być nakładane tylko w drodze ustawy lub ze względu na ważny interes publiczny. W związku z doniosłością niniejszej zasady w polskim porządku prawnym stanowi ona nadal aktualną problematykę naukowo-badawczą. Z tego też powodu autorka próbuje przedstawić najważniejsze kwestie związane z istotą wolności gospodarczej w zestawieniu z trzema głównymi modelami ekonomicznymi występującymi współcześnie oraz ograniczeniami z jakimi zasada wolności gospodarczej musi się zmierzyć.
{"title":"Wolność gospodarcza i jej ograniczenia na tle różnych modeli ekonomicznych","authors":"Monika Mielnik","doi":"10.25167/osap.5052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5052","url":null,"abstract":"Zasadą wpisaną w Konstytucję Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej jest gwarancja wolności gospodarczej, będącej jednocześnie podstawą gospodarki rynkowej, na którą ograniczenia mogą być nakładane tylko w drodze ustawy lub ze względu na ważny interes publiczny. W związku z doniosłością niniejszej zasady w polskim porządku prawnym stanowi ona nadal aktualną problematykę naukowo-badawczą. Z tego też powodu autorka próbuje przedstawić najważniejsze kwestie związane z istotą wolności gospodarczej w zestawieniu z trzema głównymi modelami ekonomicznymi występującymi współcześnie oraz ograniczeniami z jakimi zasada wolności gospodarczej musi się zmierzyć.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42845853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Niejszy artykuł przedstawia przesłanki otwarcia najbardziej charakterystycznego z postępowań restrukturyzacyjnych – postępowania sanacyjnego. Zawiera on szeroką analizę pojęcia zdolności restrukturyzacyjnej oraz podstaw jakie muszą zostać spełnione oraz które nie mogą wystąpić, aby możliwe było otwarcie postępowania. Opracowanie odnosi się do innych postępowań restrukturyzacyjnych, a także do orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów powszechnych oraz innych aktów prawnych, w tym w szczególności Prawa upadłościowego.
{"title":"Przesłanki otwarcia postępowania sanacyjnego","authors":"J. Kita","doi":"10.25167/osap.4998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4998","url":null,"abstract":"Niejszy artykuł przedstawia przesłanki otwarcia najbardziej charakterystycznego z postępowań restrukturyzacyjnych – postępowania sanacyjnego. Zawiera on szeroką analizę pojęcia zdolności restrukturyzacyjnej oraz podstaw jakie muszą zostać spełnione oraz które nie mogą wystąpić, aby możliwe było otwarcie postępowania. Opracowanie odnosi się do innych postępowań restrukturyzacyjnych, a także do orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego i sądów powszechnych oraz innych aktów prawnych, w tym w szczególności Prawa upadłościowego.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47181773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Litigation delay is a serious concern for judicial systems. In 2017, Iran enacted regulations for digitizing the judicial system in order to address this problem. This article shows whether this new policy has been an efficient move and shows solutions with more long-term results for overcoming the litigation delay. To analyze the recent reforms' efficiency, I review Iran's dispute resolution performance using secondary data from Doing Business research and the Research Center of the Iranian parliament reports in measuring the doing business environmentfrom 2016, before adopting those regulations, and then until 2019. Finally, it is concluded that Law & Economics methodology is a suitable methodology for analyzing the efficiency of 2017 Iran’s policy, which also provides ways to achieve more sustainable results to overcome the litigation delay. The main finding of this study is that according to the Kaldor-Hicks efficiency, Iran's recent reforms related to digitizing the judicial system have been an efficient move; however, due to the nature of these reforms, this efficiency does not last permanently.
{"title":"An Economic Analysis of Iran’s 2017 Judicial System Reforms: Ways with Long-term Effects to Improve Judicial System’s Litigation Delay","authors":"Zahra Sohrabi Abad","doi":"10.25167/osap.5062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5062","url":null,"abstract":"Litigation delay is a serious concern for judicial systems. In 2017, Iran enacted regulations for digitizing the judicial system in order to address this problem. This article shows whether this new policy has been an efficient move and shows solutions with more long-term results for overcoming the litigation delay. To analyze the recent reforms' efficiency, I review Iran's dispute resolution performance using secondary data from Doing Business research and the Research Center of the Iranian parliament reports in measuring the doing business environmentfrom 2016, before adopting those regulations, and then until 2019. Finally, it is concluded that Law & Economics methodology is a suitable methodology for analyzing the efficiency of 2017 Iran’s policy, which also provides ways to achieve more sustainable results to overcome the litigation delay. The main finding of this study is that according to the Kaldor-Hicks efficiency, Iran's recent reforms related to digitizing the judicial system have been an efficient move; however, due to the nature of these reforms, this efficiency does not last permanently.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42302913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The relevance of the research of applying penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations has been determined by multifaceted and controversial relations that arise regarding tax and fee collection, competence of controlling bodies, powers and duties of their officials, responsibility for violations of tax legislation. The purpose of the article is to reveal the features of applying penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations. Contemporary general philosophical, general scientific and specific scientific methods have been used. The procedure for bringing the payer to financial responsibility and fintech model when applying fines have been addressed. It has been adduced that the date from which the period during which a fine could be imposed is calculated is the date of payment of the agreed amount of the tax liability, and not the date on which the statutory payment period for the agreed monetary liability expires. Specificity of the date from which this period is calculated, has been dealt with in terms of the tax authority conducting a chamber audit on the timeliness of payment of the agreed tax (monetary) obligation, and the application of fines for late payment by the taxpayer of the agreed monetary liability is the date of actual payment of the agreed amount of the tax liability. The practical value of the results is that they could be used to establish specific temporal limits for calculating the period during which a chamber check could be conducted on the timeliness for paying the agreed monetary obligations.
{"title":"Penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations","authors":"A. Barikova","doi":"10.25167/osap.5090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5090","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the research of applying penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations has been determined by multifaceted and controversial relations that arise regarding tax and fee collection, competence of controlling bodies, powers and duties of their officials, responsibility for violations of tax legislation. The purpose of the article is to reveal the features of applying penal (financial) sanctions for non-payment of agreed amounts of tax obligations. Contemporary general philosophical, general scientific and specific scientific methods have been used. The procedure for bringing the payer to financial responsibility and fintech model when applying fines have been addressed. It has been adduced that the date from which the period during which a fine could be imposed is calculated is the date of payment of the agreed amount of the tax liability, and not the date on which the statutory payment period for the agreed monetary liability expires. Specificity of the date from which this period is calculated, has been dealt with in terms of the tax authority conducting a chamber audit on the timeliness of payment of the agreed tax (monetary) obligation, and the application of fines for late payment by the taxpayer of the agreed monetary liability is the date of actual payment of the agreed amount of the tax liability. The practical value of the results is that they could be used to establish specific temporal limits for calculating the period during which a chamber check could be conducted on the timeliness for paying the agreed monetary obligations.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48742100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Niniejszy artykuł porusza kwestie interpretacji pojęcia „wydawania wiążących poleceń” zawartego w art. 219 § 2 kodeksu spółek handlowych. Pojęcie to zostało przeanalizowane pod kątem stosowania w praktyce obowiązującej regulacji. W artykule największa uwaga została skupiona na możliwości wpływania na zarząd przez radę nadzorczą w kwestiach podstawowego funkcjonowania omawianej formy spółki prawa handlowego. Mając na względzie przyjętą praktykę „silnego” zarządu i „słabej” rady nadzorczej, Autor skupił się na przeanalizowaniu art. 219 § 2 k.s.h. w odniesieniu do wskazanej praktyki oraz dopuszczalności wpływania rady nadzorczej na działania zarządu odnośnie prowadzenia spraw spółki.
{"title":"Zakaz wydawania wiążących poleceń przez radę nadzorczą zarządowi spółki z o.o.","authors":"Grzegorz Adam Kawalec","doi":"10.25167/osap.4999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4999","url":null,"abstract":"Niniejszy artykuł porusza kwestie interpretacji pojęcia „wydawania wiążących poleceń” zawartego w art. 219 § 2 kodeksu spółek handlowych. Pojęcie to zostało przeanalizowane pod kątem stosowania w praktyce obowiązującej regulacji. W artykule największa uwaga została skupiona na możliwości wpływania na zarząd przez radę nadzorczą w kwestiach podstawowego funkcjonowania omawianej formy spółki prawa handlowego. Mając na względzie przyjętą praktykę „silnego” zarządu i „słabej” rady nadzorczej, Autor skupił się na przeanalizowaniu art. 219 § 2 k.s.h. w odniesieniu do wskazanej praktyki oraz dopuszczalności wpływania rady nadzorczej na działania zarządu odnośnie prowadzenia spraw spółki.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43438282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention grants members of the public (meeting certain requirements, if a Party to the Convention so specifies) access to a review procedure (access to justice) to challenge acts or omissions by private persons or public authorities that contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment. According to Article 2.4 of the Convention, non-governmental organisations should also be considered as "members of the public". According to the jurisprudence of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, the activities of public authorities covered by the requirements of Article 9.3 of the Convention include adoption of plans and programmes which may have an impact on the environment. In accordance with the Polish law (often following the requirements of EU law), administrative authorities adopt a whole range of plans and programmes relating to the environment or having an impact on the environment. These documents are developed either by regional or local authorities (self-governmental authorities or regional government administration) or at the central level. Polish law provides very limited opportunities to challenge plans or programmes. With respect to documents created at the central level, there are no such possibilities at all, and with respect to documents created at lower levels, certain, limited, rights in this respect are granted only to private entities whose legal interest has been violated. The possibility for NGOs to challenge plans or programmes is completely excluded. Such a situation should be considered non-compliant with the Aarhus Convention.
{"title":"Access to justice regarding plans and programmes related to the environment – Polish law in the light of Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention","authors":"M. Bar","doi":"10.25167/osap.5005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5005","url":null,"abstract":"Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention grants members of the public (meeting certain requirements, if a Party to the Convention so specifies) access to a review procedure (access to justice) to challenge acts or omissions by private persons or public authorities that contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment. According to Article 2.4 of the Convention, non-governmental organisations should also be considered as \"members of the public\". \u0000According to the jurisprudence of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, the activities of public authorities covered by the requirements of Article 9.3 of the Convention include adoption of plans and programmes which may have an impact on the environment. \u0000In accordance with the Polish law (often following the requirements of EU law), administrative authorities adopt a whole range of plans and programmes relating to the environment or having an impact on the environment. These documents are developed either by regional or local authorities (self-governmental authorities or regional government administration) or at the central level. \u0000Polish law provides very limited opportunities to challenge plans or programmes. With respect to documents created at the central level, there are no such possibilities at all, and with respect to documents created at lower levels, certain, limited, rights in this respect are granted only to private entities whose legal interest has been violated. The possibility for NGOs to challenge plans or programmes is completely excluded. \u0000Such a situation should be considered non-compliant with the Aarhus Convention.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42690989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Digital technologies are becoming increasingly important to environmental defenders,both in terms of tools that facilitate speaking out and/or taking action, and in termsof (digital) risks they face as a result of their involvement. A growing concern has beenexpressed about the use of various forms of online and technology-facilitated intimidationor “digital intimidation” against environmental defenders. While the existing research oncyberbullying, digital violence and online intimidation can provide some insight, few studiesand data exist on the use of such tactics against environmental defenders in particular.By leaving this issue unexamined, there remains a lack of awareness about the risks andchallenges environmental defenders may face in terms of online safety and digital intimidation,which may ultimately curtail public debate on environmental issues. Fortunately, theprotections under Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention and the recently introduced SpecialRapporteur for Environmental Defenders can be useful in providing protection againstdigital intimidation. This paper, therefore, looks at the application of Article 3(8) to digitalintimidation, through the decisions of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, andalso considers the mandate given to the Special Rapporteur at the 2020 Meeting of theParties. The analysis shows that there is certainly potential for protection against digital intimidationunder Article 3(8) AC, but more explicit attention and awareness may be needed.
{"title":"The need for protection of environmental defenders from digital intimidation: an analysis of Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention","authors":"Lien Stolle","doi":"10.25167/osap.4980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4980","url":null,"abstract":"Digital technologies are becoming increasingly important to environmental defenders,both in terms of tools that facilitate speaking out and/or taking action, and in termsof (digital) risks they face as a result of their involvement. A growing concern has beenexpressed about the use of various forms of online and technology-facilitated intimidationor “digital intimidation” against environmental defenders. While the existing research oncyberbullying, digital violence and online intimidation can provide some insight, few studiesand data exist on the use of such tactics against environmental defenders in particular.By leaving this issue unexamined, there remains a lack of awareness about the risks andchallenges environmental defenders may face in terms of online safety and digital intimidation,which may ultimately curtail public debate on environmental issues. Fortunately, theprotections under Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention and the recently introduced SpecialRapporteur for Environmental Defenders can be useful in providing protection againstdigital intimidation. This paper, therefore, looks at the application of Article 3(8) to digitalintimidation, through the decisions of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, andalso considers the mandate given to the Special Rapporteur at the 2020 Meeting of theParties. The analysis shows that there is certainly potential for protection against digital intimidationunder Article 3(8) AC, but more explicit attention and awareness may be needed.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41338945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Celem rozważań prowadzonych w artykule będzie próba wskazania zakresu przedmiotowego regulacji w zakresie platform udostępniania wideo oraz charakterystyka działań mających na celu zgodne z postanowieniami dyrektywy o audiowizualnych usługach medialnych udostępnienie treści przez dostawców oraz sposoby postępowania z treściami zabronionymi przez prawo. Metodą podstawową zastosowaną w artykule jest analiza interpretacyjna aktów normatywnych.
{"title":"Ochrona przed treściami nielegalnymi i szkodliwymi na platformach udostępniania video","authors":"Agnieszka Grzesiok-Horosz","doi":"10.25167/osap.5083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5083","url":null,"abstract":"Celem rozważań prowadzonych w artykule będzie próba wskazania zakresu przedmiotowego regulacji w zakresie platform udostępniania wideo oraz charakterystyka działań mających na celu zgodne z postanowieniami dyrektywy o audiowizualnych usługach medialnych udostępnienie treści przez dostawców oraz sposoby postępowania z treściami zabronionymi przez prawo. Metodą podstawową zastosowaną w artykule jest analiza interpretacyjna aktów normatywnych.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43762280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：