O papel da literacia em saúde na decisão médica partilhada

Saude Tecnologia Pub Date : 2016-12-28 DOI:10.25758/SET.1501
A. Varela
{"title":"O papel da literacia em saúde na decisão médica partilhada","authors":"A. Varela","doi":"10.25758/SET.1501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Some studies have shown the relationship between an increased and more structured involvement of patients in clinical decision making, the improvement of literacy in health and the obtainment of health gains. However, the existence of misconceptions on the part of doctors and other health professionals may contribute to their low compliance regarding shared clinical decision and discussion of treatment options, particularly with users with low levels of literacy. With this critical essay, we intend to clarify these misconceptions, by doing an in depth reflection and analysis on communication’s key elements centered on the patient – health literacy and shared decision. Relevant issues about literacy in health and shared decision were presented, on which critical content was developed. This development is the most extensive part of the essay. We transmitted the point of view of several authors and a critical analysis, and we tried to illustrate these ideas with examples and research studies, thus validating the presented arguments and answering to questions raised during the analysis. Final considerations of this critical essay stress that promoting an increased user participation in clinical decision making improves the level of health literacy, through a patient-focused communication performed by qualified professionals taking into consideration social determinants, and health gains are obtained.","PeriodicalId":30555,"journal":{"name":"Saude Tecnologia","volume":"1 1","pages":"44-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude Tecnologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25758/SET.1501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Some studies have shown the relationship between an increased and more structured involvement of patients in clinical decision making, the improvement of literacy in health and the obtainment of health gains. However, the existence of misconceptions on the part of doctors and other health professionals may contribute to their low compliance regarding shared clinical decision and discussion of treatment options, particularly with users with low levels of literacy. With this critical essay, we intend to clarify these misconceptions, by doing an in depth reflection and analysis on communication’s key elements centered on the patient – health literacy and shared decision. Relevant issues about literacy in health and shared decision were presented, on which critical content was developed. This development is the most extensive part of the essay. We transmitted the point of view of several authors and a critical analysis, and we tried to illustrate these ideas with examples and research studies, thus validating the presented arguments and answering to questions raised during the analysis. Final considerations of this critical essay stress that promoting an increased user participation in clinical decision making improves the level of health literacy, through a patient-focused communication performed by qualified professionals taking into consideration social determinants, and health gains are obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生知识普及在共同医疗决策中的作用
摘要:一些研究表明,患者在临床决策中的参与度和结构化程度的增加与健康素养的提高和健康收益的获得之间存在关系。然而,医生和其他保健专业人员存在误解,可能导致他们在共同临床决定和讨论治疗方案方面的依从性较低,特别是对文化水平较低的用户而言。通过这篇批判性的文章,我们打算澄清这些误解,通过对以患者健康素养和共同决策为中心的沟通关键要素进行深入的反思和分析。会议提出了有关卫生扫盲和共同决策的相关问题,并据此制定了重要内容。这个发展是这篇文章最广泛的部分。我们传递了几位作者的观点和批判性分析,我们试图用例子和研究来说明这些观点,从而验证所提出的论点,并回答分析过程中提出的问题。这篇批判性文章的最后考虑强调,促进用户更多地参与临床决策,通过合格的专业人员在考虑社会决定因素的情况下进行以患者为中心的沟通,提高卫生素养水平,并获得健康收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Análise da variabilidade de medição interoperador de parâmetros pré e pós-operatórios em olhos com implante de lente de colâmero implantável (ICL) através da tomografia de coerência ótica do segmento anterior Contributo de vídeos no ensino prático na área disciplinar de Ortóptica na ESTeSL Estudo da exposição da população a poluentes do ar nos transportes em ambiente urbano: artigo de revisão Tomografia computorizada de perfusão cerebral no AVC isquémico: previsão do ASPECTS final através dos valores de Core e Penumbra Dilatadores vaginais na prevenção da estenose vaginal em doentes submetidas a braquiterapia ginecológica: revisão sistemática da literatura
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1