Pet Ownership, Type of Pet and Socio-Emotional Development of School Children

IF 1.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Anthrozoos Pub Date : 1999-12-01 DOI:10.2752/089279399787000129
Vlasta Vizek Vidović, Vesna Vlahović Štetić, D. Bratko
{"title":"Pet Ownership, Type of Pet and Socio-Emotional Development of School Children","authors":"Vlasta Vizek Vidović, Vesna Vlahović Štetić, D. Bratko","doi":"10.2752/089279399787000129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study was designed to compare the socio-emotional characteristics of school children pet owners and children without pets and to examine whether the type of pet is a variable which can differentiate the socio-emotional development of their owners. The subjects, 425 girls and 401 boys, were students of fourth (n=265), sixth (n=295) and eighth (n=266) grade of elementary schools from the metropolitan area of Zagreb, Croatia. Socio-emotional variables assessed in the study were: child attachment to pet, child prosocial orientation, empathy, loneliness, perception of family climate and social anxiety. The data showed that 54.4% of children in the sample were pet owners (26.2% of children in the study had a dog, 9.2% had a cat, and 19.0% had some other pet). In order to answer the main research question, several analyses of variance (gender by grade by pet ownership) were computed for each criterion of socio-emotional development. Significant main effects were obtained for empathy, prosocial orientation and pet attachment, with dog owners being more empathic and prosocially oriented than non-owners, and dog owners and cat owners being more attached to their pets than owners of other kinds of pets. Additional analyses of variance were computed in order to examine the role of attachment in the socio-emotional functioning of the children. Subjects were divided in three sub-groups: non-owners, lower then average attached owners, and higher than average attached owners. Children who scored higher than average on the attachment to pets scale showed significantly higher scores on the empathy and prosocial orientation scales than non-owners and children who scored lower than average on the attachment to pets scale. It was also found that children with higher levels of attachment to pets rated their family climate significantly better than children who had lower attachment to pets.","PeriodicalId":50748,"journal":{"name":"Anthrozoos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2752/089279399787000129","citationCount":"165","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthrozoos","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2752/089279399787000129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 165

Abstract

The current study was designed to compare the socio-emotional characteristics of school children pet owners and children without pets and to examine whether the type of pet is a variable which can differentiate the socio-emotional development of their owners. The subjects, 425 girls and 401 boys, were students of fourth (n=265), sixth (n=295) and eighth (n=266) grade of elementary schools from the metropolitan area of Zagreb, Croatia. Socio-emotional variables assessed in the study were: child attachment to pet, child prosocial orientation, empathy, loneliness, perception of family climate and social anxiety. The data showed that 54.4% of children in the sample were pet owners (26.2% of children in the study had a dog, 9.2% had a cat, and 19.0% had some other pet). In order to answer the main research question, several analyses of variance (gender by grade by pet ownership) were computed for each criterion of socio-emotional development. Significant main effects were obtained for empathy, prosocial orientation and pet attachment, with dog owners being more empathic and prosocially oriented than non-owners, and dog owners and cat owners being more attached to their pets than owners of other kinds of pets. Additional analyses of variance were computed in order to examine the role of attachment in the socio-emotional functioning of the children. Subjects were divided in three sub-groups: non-owners, lower then average attached owners, and higher than average attached owners. Children who scored higher than average on the attachment to pets scale showed significantly higher scores on the empathy and prosocial orientation scales than non-owners and children who scored lower than average on the attachment to pets scale. It was also found that children with higher levels of attachment to pets rated their family climate significantly better than children who had lower attachment to pets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养宠物、宠物类型与学龄儿童社会情感发展
本研究旨在比较养宠物和不养宠物的学龄儿童的社会情感特征,并检验宠物的类型是否是区分其主人社会情感发展的变量。研究对象为425名女生和401名男生,分别是克罗地亚萨格勒布市区小学四年级(265名)、六年级(295名)和八年级(266名)的学生。研究评估的社会情绪变量包括:儿童对宠物的依恋、儿童亲社会倾向、共情、孤独感、家庭氛围感知和社交焦虑。数据显示,样本中54.4%的孩子养宠物(26.2%的孩子养狗,9.2%养猫,19.0%养其他宠物)。为了回答主要的研究问题,我们对社会情感发展的每个标准进行了方差分析(性别、年级、养宠物)。共情、亲社会取向和宠物依恋均有显著的主效应,养狗的人比不养狗的人更有共情和亲社会取向,养狗和养猫的人比养其他种类宠物的人更有宠物依恋。为了检验依恋在儿童社会情感功能中的作用,计算了额外的方差分析。受试者被分为三组:非业主,低于平均水平的业主,高于平均水平的业主。在宠物依恋量表上得分高于平均水平的儿童在同理心和亲社会取向量表上的得分明显高于无主人和低于平均水平的儿童。研究还发现,与宠物依恋程度较低的孩子相比,对宠物依恋程度较高的孩子对家庭环境的评价要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthrozoos
Anthrozoos 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: A vital forum for academic dialogue on human-animal relations, Anthrozoös is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that has enjoyed a distinguished history as a pioneer in the field since its launch in 1987. The key premise of Anthrozoös is to address the characteristics and consequences of interactions and relationships between people and non-human animals across areas as varied as anthropology, ethology, medicine, psychology, veterinary medicine and zoology. Articles therefore cover the full range of human–animal relations, from their treatment in the arts and humanities, through to behavioral, biological, social and health sciences.
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Cultural Study of Veterinarians’ Attitudes to the Euthanasia of Companion Animals An Evaluation of a Canine Welfare Education Intervention for Primary School Children Exploring Animal Abuse Proclivity, Everyday Sadism, and Attitudes Toward Animals in Cyprus “Has an Ugly Caw”: The Moral Implications of How Hunting Organizations Depict Nonhuman Animals A Preliminary Analysis of Psychiatric Service Dog Placements and Sleep Patterns of Partners of Veterans with PTSD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1