Stocks and oxidizable fractions of soil organic matter under organic coffee agroforestry systems

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Coffee Science Pub Date : 2014-03-31 DOI:10.25186/CS.V9I1.564
G. P. Guimarães, E. Mendonça, R. R. Passos, F. V. Andrade
{"title":"Stocks and oxidizable fractions of soil organic matter under organic coffee agroforestry systems","authors":"G. P. Guimarães, E. Mendonça, R. R. Passos, F. V. Andrade","doi":"10.25186/CS.V9I1.564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research evaluating the impact of different management systems coffee are essential for determining soil quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of production systems for organic coffee and agroforestry on stocks of carbon, nitrogen and organic matter quality in two farms in the region Caparao- Espirito Santo- Brazil. In farm 1 systems were evaluated primary forest, organic coffee and conventional coffee. In farm 2 systems were evaluated secondary forest, organic coffee intercropped with inga, organic coffee intercropped with leucaena and inga, organic coffee intercropped cedar and conventional coffee full sun. Soil samples were collected in canopy projection coffee in the depths 0-10, 10-20, 20-40, 40-60 and 60-100 cm. The C and N stock reflected the management history in relation to forest areas, with the greatest impact in the 0-10 cm. This depth, to the farm 1, the conventional coffee obtained reductions of 27.3 % and 14.9 % respectively in C and N stocks in relation to organic coffee. For farm 2, reductions in C and N stocks the coffee conventional full sun in relation to agroforestry coffee were 22.1 % and 31.4 %, respectively. The C stocks accumulated were reduced in coffee systems in 28.6 % and 17.4 % respectively in relation to primary and secondary forests. The mineralizable C content was higher in the soil surface layers and in the organic coffee systems compared to conventional coffee, in the farm 2. The coffee agroforestry system provided higher carbon management index in relation to organic coffee without consortium and conventional coffee, providing better soil quality.","PeriodicalId":10587,"journal":{"name":"Coffee Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"132-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coffee Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25186/CS.V9I1.564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Research evaluating the impact of different management systems coffee are essential for determining soil quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of production systems for organic coffee and agroforestry on stocks of carbon, nitrogen and organic matter quality in two farms in the region Caparao- Espirito Santo- Brazil. In farm 1 systems were evaluated primary forest, organic coffee and conventional coffee. In farm 2 systems were evaluated secondary forest, organic coffee intercropped with inga, organic coffee intercropped with leucaena and inga, organic coffee intercropped cedar and conventional coffee full sun. Soil samples were collected in canopy projection coffee in the depths 0-10, 10-20, 20-40, 40-60 and 60-100 cm. The C and N stock reflected the management history in relation to forest areas, with the greatest impact in the 0-10 cm. This depth, to the farm 1, the conventional coffee obtained reductions of 27.3 % and 14.9 % respectively in C and N stocks in relation to organic coffee. For farm 2, reductions in C and N stocks the coffee conventional full sun in relation to agroforestry coffee were 22.1 % and 31.4 %, respectively. The C stocks accumulated were reduced in coffee systems in 28.6 % and 17.4 % respectively in relation to primary and secondary forests. The mineralizable C content was higher in the soil surface layers and in the organic coffee systems compared to conventional coffee, in the farm 2. The coffee agroforestry system provided higher carbon management index in relation to organic coffee without consortium and conventional coffee, providing better soil quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机咖啡农林复合系统下土壤有机质存量和可氧化组分
研究评估不同管理制度对土壤质量的影响是确定土壤质量的必要条件。本研究的目的是评估有机咖啡和农林业生产系统对巴西卡帕劳-圣埃斯皮里图地区两个农场的碳、氮和有机质质量的影响。在农场1系统中,对原始森林、有机咖啡和常规咖啡进行了评估。在2个农场系统中,对次生林、有机咖啡间作印加木、有机咖啡间作合欢木和印加木、有机咖啡间作雪松和常规咖啡全日照进行了评价。土壤样品采集深度分别为0-10、10-20、20-40、40-60和60-100 cm。碳氮储量反映了不同林地的经营历史,在0 ~ 10 cm影响最大。在这个深度,对农场1来说,常规咖啡的碳氮储量与有机咖啡相比分别减少了27.3%和14.9%。对于农场2,与农林业咖啡相比,常规全日咖啡的碳和氮储量分别减少22.1%和31.4%。与原生林和次生林相比,咖啡系统累积的碳储量分别减少了28.6%和17.4%。与传统咖啡相比,该农场土壤表层和有机咖啡系统中的可矿化碳含量更高。咖啡农林复合系统的碳管理指数高于有机咖啡和常规咖啡,土壤质量也较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coffee Science
Coffee Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Ventralex™ ST Hernia Patch Repair for Small Umbilical Hernia is Safe and Effective: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Physical and Chemical Properties of Activated Nanocarbon produced from Robusta (Coffea Canephora) Coffee Pulp under slow pyrolysis method Bioactive compounds in blends of coffee defects originating from the harvesting The influence of temperature and duration of brewing on the sensorial value of Gayo Arabica wine coffee, a comparison of hedonic and cupping test methods Biocontrol of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in arabica coffee seedling by using fortified bacterial consortium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1