“Whom the Gods Wish to Destroy”

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS POETICA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SPRACH-UND LITERATURWISSENSCHAFT Pub Date : 2022-06-29 DOI:10.30965/25890530-05301005
Ingo Berensmeyer
{"title":"“Whom the Gods Wish to Destroy”","authors":"Ingo Berensmeyer","doi":"10.30965/25890530-05301005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper examines narrative representations of authors and authorship in English-language fiction from the 1890s to the 1920s. From Henry James onwards, such narratives revise the basic, and by that time exhausted, plot elements of the novel of literary apprenticeship as featured in Dickens’s David Copperfield and Thackeray’s Pendennis, among many others. Instead of focusing on ideas of development and professional formation, they depict authors subdued by a sense of shrinking opportunities and lack of movement. Aging or dying authors in James and Mann, young but soon disappointed authors in Joyce, Forster, or Green: wherever we look, we find an ambivalence of promise that often ends in stagnation, failure, even death. In this context, my paper presents a close reading of three less frequently discussed modernist variations on the literary bildungsroman: Arthur Machen’s The Hill of Dreams (1897/1907), E.M. Forster’s The Longest Journey (1907), and Henry Green’s Blindness (1926).","PeriodicalId":44401,"journal":{"name":"POETICA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SPRACH-UND LITERATURWISSENSCHAFT","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POETICA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SPRACH-UND LITERATURWISSENSCHAFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/25890530-05301005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines narrative representations of authors and authorship in English-language fiction from the 1890s to the 1920s. From Henry James onwards, such narratives revise the basic, and by that time exhausted, plot elements of the novel of literary apprenticeship as featured in Dickens’s David Copperfield and Thackeray’s Pendennis, among many others. Instead of focusing on ideas of development and professional formation, they depict authors subdued by a sense of shrinking opportunities and lack of movement. Aging or dying authors in James and Mann, young but soon disappointed authors in Joyce, Forster, or Green: wherever we look, we find an ambivalence of promise that often ends in stagnation, failure, even death. In this context, my paper presents a close reading of three less frequently discussed modernist variations on the literary bildungsroman: Arthur Machen’s The Hill of Dreams (1897/1907), E.M. Forster’s The Longest Journey (1907), and Henry Green’s Blindness (1926).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《众神欲灭之人》
本文考察了19世纪90年代至20世纪20年代英语小说中作者的叙事表现和作者身份。从亨利·詹姆斯(Henry James)开始,这种叙事修改了狄更斯的《大卫·科波菲尔》(David Copperfield)和萨克雷的《潘登尼斯》(Pendennis)等许多文学学徒小说中基本的、当时已经耗尽的情节元素。他们没有关注发展和专业形成的想法,而是描绘了被机会萎缩和缺乏运动感所压抑的作者。詹姆斯和曼恩是年迈或垂死的作家,乔伊斯、福斯特或格林是年轻但很快就失望的作家:无论我们往哪里看,我们都能发现一种矛盾的承诺,这种承诺往往以停滞、失败甚至死亡告终。在此背景下,我的论文仔细阅读了三个不太常被讨论的现代主义文学成长小说的变体:阿瑟·梅琴的《梦之山》(1897/1907),E.M.福斯特的《最长的旅程》(1907)和亨利·格林的《失明》(1926)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Lyrische Deutungshoheit im Neunjährigen Krieg das auffmercken in dem gebete ist dreierley̋ Vermeintlich unvermeidlich: Poetik und Psychologie der Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Rückübertragung der Form. Rudolf Borchardts Pindar Der Tod im Leben – John Donnes Jenseitsästhetik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1