The Expansion of the Preposition pro in Modern Russian Speech, or The Latest Russian Rhetoric

Q2 Arts and Humanities Kritika i Semiotika Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-238-258
I. Vysotskaya
{"title":"The Expansion of the Preposition pro in Modern Russian Speech, or The Latest Russian Rhetoric","authors":"I. Vysotskaya","doi":"10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-238-258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article notes the tendency towards the preferred choice of the preposition pro (about) (instead of o) in modern Russian speech. The above said leads to a change in the compatibility of the accusative word form with the explanatory meaning, to an expansion of the range of verbs and nouns that control this form. The use of the word forms in names is updated (in different communicative spheres). Observations on the use of the so-called “The Accusative of theme” in media speech allowed us to identify different communicative intentions of the speaker, which are marked by the word form pro (about) N4: fixation of the topic, announcement, continuation and development, return to the topic, change of topic, forecast, clarification, accentuation. In addition, as part of the predicate, the word form with the preposition pro (about) is used as a means of the object of speech / thought characterization. In these syntactic conditions, a new way of defining the concept is formed: X eto pro (is about) N4, as well as a new question: What is X about? They are actively used in speech by adherents of the newest rhetorical canon – as opposed to the traditional one.","PeriodicalId":36800,"journal":{"name":"Kritika i Semiotika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritika i Semiotika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-238-258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article notes the tendency towards the preferred choice of the preposition pro (about) (instead of o) in modern Russian speech. The above said leads to a change in the compatibility of the accusative word form with the explanatory meaning, to an expansion of the range of verbs and nouns that control this form. The use of the word forms in names is updated (in different communicative spheres). Observations on the use of the so-called “The Accusative of theme” in media speech allowed us to identify different communicative intentions of the speaker, which are marked by the word form pro (about) N4: fixation of the topic, announcement, continuation and development, return to the topic, change of topic, forecast, clarification, accentuation. In addition, as part of the predicate, the word form with the preposition pro (about) is used as a means of the object of speech / thought characterization. In these syntactic conditions, a new way of defining the concept is formed: X eto pro (is about) N4, as well as a new question: What is X about? They are actively used in speech by adherents of the newest rhetorical canon – as opposed to the traditional one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介词pro在现代俄语言语中的扩展,或者说最新的俄语修辞学
本文注意到,在现代俄语口语中,介词pro(约)(而不是o)有首选的趋势。上述情况导致宾格词形式与解释意义的兼容性发生变化,控制这种形式的动词和名词的范围扩大。(在不同的交际领域中)姓名中词形的使用得到了更新。通过观察媒体话语中所谓“主位宾格”的使用,我们可以识别出说话人不同的交际意图,这些意图以词形pro (about) N4为标志:固定话题、宣布、继续和发展、回到话题、改变话题、预测、澄清、强调。此外,作为谓语的一部分,带有介词pro(约)的词形式被用作表征言语/思想对象的手段。在这些句法条件下,形成了一种新的定义概念的方式:X eto pro (is about) N4,以及一个新的问题:What is X about?与传统修辞学相反,最新修辞学经典的追随者在演讲中积极使用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kritika i Semiotika
Kritika i Semiotika Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Processes in Russian Emotive-Evaluative Vocabulary Far Eastern Futurists and the Satirical Leaflet “Blokha” (“Flea”) (Vladivostok, 1920) Metadrama in V. Mirzoev’s Works Evaluation as a Source of Deontic Modality Adverbs of Evaluation: Correlation of Semantic and Syntactic Properties (The Case of General and Hedonistic Evaluation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1