Rare Merit: Women in Photography in Canada, 1840–1940

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Panorama Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/24716839.17497
Colleen Skidmore
{"title":"Rare Merit: Women in Photography in Canada, 1840–1940","authors":"Colleen Skidmore","doi":"10.24926/24716839.17497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Why women?” In the introduction to Rare Merit: Women in Photography in Canada, 1840–1940, Colleen Skidmore reflects on this question posed by the late American photography historian Naomi Rosenblum, known in photo history classrooms everywhere for her 1984 survey text, A World History of Photography, now in its fifth edition. This question reminds me of Linda Nochlin’s 1971 essay, “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?,” which, like Rosenblum’s historical text, has been republished and revised many times over the last fifty years. Nochlin suggests that instead of falling prey to the question’s trap by offering up examples of “great” women artists from history or by conceiving of a different criterion of greatness for women artists all together, we should instead think about why such a question even requires asking in the first place. Nochlin urges her readers to consider the larger structures of inequity at play within the discipline that have marginalized women from achieving the institutional status of greatness. The question “Why women?” in art studies is not a new one, though Skidmore’s Rare Merit is evidence that it remains pressing.","PeriodicalId":42739,"journal":{"name":"Panorama","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panorama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/24716839.17497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Why women?” In the introduction to Rare Merit: Women in Photography in Canada, 1840–1940, Colleen Skidmore reflects on this question posed by the late American photography historian Naomi Rosenblum, known in photo history classrooms everywhere for her 1984 survey text, A World History of Photography, now in its fifth edition. This question reminds me of Linda Nochlin’s 1971 essay, “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?,” which, like Rosenblum’s historical text, has been republished and revised many times over the last fifty years. Nochlin suggests that instead of falling prey to the question’s trap by offering up examples of “great” women artists from history or by conceiving of a different criterion of greatness for women artists all together, we should instead think about why such a question even requires asking in the first place. Nochlin urges her readers to consider the larger structures of inequity at play within the discipline that have marginalized women from achieving the institutional status of greatness. The question “Why women?” in art studies is not a new one, though Skidmore’s Rare Merit is evidence that it remains pressing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罕见的功绩:加拿大摄影中的女性,1840-1940
“为什么女人?”在《罕见的优点:加拿大摄影中的女性,1840-1940》的介绍中,Colleen Skidmore反思了已故美国摄影历史学家Naomi Rosenblum提出的这个问题,Naomi Rosenblum因其1984年的调查文本《世界摄影史》而闻名于各地的摄影历史课堂,现在已经是第五版了。这个问题让我想起琳达·诺克林1971年的文章《为什么没有伟大的女艺术家?》,这本书和罗森布鲁姆的历史文本一样,在过去50年里被多次再版和修订。诺克林建议,我们不应该通过举出历史上“伟大的”女艺术家的例子,或者为所有女艺术家构想一个不同的伟大标准,而陷入这个问题的陷阱,相反,我们应该首先思考为什么需要提出这样一个问题。诺克林敦促她的读者去思考这个学科中存在的更大的不平等结构,正是这些结构使女性被边缘化,无法获得伟大的机构地位。“为什么是女人?”在艺术研究中,这并不是一个新问题,尽管斯基德莫尔的《稀有优点》证明了这一问题仍然紧迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Panorama
Panorama SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
EL PROCESO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y SU RELACIÓN CON LA MOTIVACIÓN INTRÍNSECA Y EXTRÍNSECA Self-Portraits and Photocopies: Anita Steckel’s Feminist Collage Amalia Mesa-Bains: Archeology of Memory The Work of Undoing Highpoint Editions: A History & Catalogue, 2001–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1