Проблемные аспекты оценки эпидемиологической эффективности вакцинопрофилактики клещевого энцефалита

Наталья Пеньевская, Николай Рудаков, С. А. Рудакова
{"title":"Проблемные аспекты оценки эпидемиологической эффективности вакцинопрофилактики клещевого энцефалита","authors":"Наталья Пеньевская, Николай Рудаков, С. А. Рудакова","doi":"10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-78-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review analyzes the methodological reasons for the heterogeneity of the results of the evaluation of the epidemiological effectiveness of vaccine prophylaxis of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) using indicators such as the efficiency coefficient (COEF) and the efficiency index (IEF), and their discrepancy with similar indicators of the immunological effectiveness of vaccines. It is shown that the calculation of COEF and IEF according to official statistical reporting is illegal in connection with the emergence of systematic errors of selection due to the impossibility of retrospective formation of compared groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated, comparable in risk of infection and disease. In addition, COEF and IEF do not allow to compare the efficiency of vaccination in different areas in physical and monetary units. Based on the analysis of the literature data on immunogenicity of modern vaccines against TBE, protective titer of antibodies and results of field tests of vaccine efficacy in the conditions of total coverage of the population with vaccinations, the authors conclude that the third generation vaccines against TBE protect against disease 95–98% of persons attacked by ticks. Algorithm for calculating the number of preventable cases of TBE diseases is proposed for a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of vaccination as an anti-epidemic measure in different areas.","PeriodicalId":36064,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","volume":"17 1","pages":"78-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-78-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This review analyzes the methodological reasons for the heterogeneity of the results of the evaluation of the epidemiological effectiveness of vaccine prophylaxis of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) using indicators such as the efficiency coefficient (COEF) and the efficiency index (IEF), and their discrepancy with similar indicators of the immunological effectiveness of vaccines. It is shown that the calculation of COEF and IEF according to official statistical reporting is illegal in connection with the emergence of systematic errors of selection due to the impossibility of retrospective formation of compared groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated, comparable in risk of infection and disease. In addition, COEF and IEF do not allow to compare the efficiency of vaccination in different areas in physical and monetary units. Based on the analysis of the literature data on immunogenicity of modern vaccines against TBE, protective titer of antibodies and results of field tests of vaccine efficacy in the conditions of total coverage of the population with vaccinations, the authors conclude that the third generation vaccines against TBE protect against disease 95–98% of persons attacked by ticks. Algorithm for calculating the number of preventable cases of TBE diseases is proposed for a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of vaccination as an anti-epidemic measure in different areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜱传脑炎疫苗预防流行病学有效性评估的问题
本文分析了利用效率系数(COEF)和效率指数(IEF)等指标评价蜱传脑炎(TBE)疫苗预防流行病学有效性结果存在异质性的方法学原因,以及它们与类似疫苗免疫学有效性指标的差异。报告显示,根据官方统计报告计算COEF和IEF是非法的,因为由于不可能回顾性地形成在感染和疾病风险方面具有可比性的接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的比较组,因此出现了系统的选择错误。此外,COEF和IEF不允许以实物和货币单位比较不同地区的疫苗接种效率。通过对现代流行性腮腺炎疫苗免疫原性、抗体保护效价和疫苗在人群免疫总覆盖率条件下的现场效果试验的文献资料分析,作者认为第三代流行性腮腺炎疫苗对蜱虫攻击人群的免疫保护率为95 ~ 98%。提出了一种计算TBE可预防病例数的算法,用于比较评价不同地区疫苗接种作为防疫措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika
Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Conjugated Vaccines and the Problem of Changing Circulating Serotypes of Pneumococcus Specificity of Teaching in the Section «General Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases» for Foreign Students Similarities and Differences in the Manifestations of the COVID-19 Epidemic Process in Some Countries Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Use of Personal Protective Equipment by Personnel of Medical Organizations of Various Profiles in the Provision of Medical Care to Patients with COVID-19 Assessment of the State of Antidiphtheria Immunity in Different Age Groups of the Population of the Russian Federation Based on Seromonitoring Data for 2015–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1