Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Intervention for People with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

H. Gimeno, M. Jackman, I. Novak
{"title":"Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Intervention for People with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis","authors":"H. Gimeno, M. Jackman, I. Novak","doi":"10.26502/jppch.74050077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) was originally designed for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder but has more recently been applied to the cerebral palsy population who also have disorders of motor function and executive function. The aim of this review was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of CO-OP in the cerebral palsy population. Methods: A systematic literature review was carried out to identify studies on CO-OP for people with cerebral palsy, using the Medline, CINAHL and ERIC databases between 22 June and 30 June 2021. Results: The search elicited 44 citations, of which 8 studies met eligibility. Five were observational studies (three of five Single Case Experimental Design), three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), measuring the effects of CO-OP in 100 people with cerebral palsy. Since CO-OP was repurposed to cerebral palsy, initial studies focussed on feasibility, acceptability and J Pediatr Perinatol Child Health 2021; 5 (3): 177-193 DOI: 10.26502/jppch.74050077 Journal of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 178 preliminary efficacy, and consequently sample sizes were small with high risk of bias. Pooled findings from RCTs indicate CO-OP produces greater gains in goal achievement than to body functions and structure intervention (Standardised Mean Difference 0.86 [95% Confidence Interval 0.20-1.52]). Conclusions: Findings suggest preliminary efficacy of CO-OP for cerebral palsy compared to body functions and structure interventions for goal attainment, with CO-OP having comparable efficacy to other activitiesbased interventions. More clinical trials with adequate power and an individual patient meta-analysis are","PeriodicalId":73894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jppch.74050077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) was originally designed for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder but has more recently been applied to the cerebral palsy population who also have disorders of motor function and executive function. The aim of this review was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of CO-OP in the cerebral palsy population. Methods: A systematic literature review was carried out to identify studies on CO-OP for people with cerebral palsy, using the Medline, CINAHL and ERIC databases between 22 June and 30 June 2021. Results: The search elicited 44 citations, of which 8 studies met eligibility. Five were observational studies (three of five Single Case Experimental Design), three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), measuring the effects of CO-OP in 100 people with cerebral palsy. Since CO-OP was repurposed to cerebral palsy, initial studies focussed on feasibility, acceptability and J Pediatr Perinatol Child Health 2021; 5 (3): 177-193 DOI: 10.26502/jppch.74050077 Journal of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 178 preliminary efficacy, and consequently sample sizes were small with high risk of bias. Pooled findings from RCTs indicate CO-OP produces greater gains in goal achievement than to body functions and structure intervention (Standardised Mean Difference 0.86 [95% Confidence Interval 0.20-1.52]). Conclusions: Findings suggest preliminary efficacy of CO-OP for cerebral palsy compared to body functions and structure interventions for goal attainment, with CO-OP having comparable efficacy to other activitiesbased interventions. More clinical trials with adequate power and an individual patient meta-analysis are
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知取向对脑瘫患者日常职业表现(CO-OP)干预的meta分析
目的:日常职业表现的认知取向(CO-OP)最初是为患有发育性协调障碍的儿童设计的,但最近越来越多地应用于患有运动功能和执行功能障碍的脑瘫人群。本综述的目的是研究CO-OP在脑瘫人群中的可行性、可接受性和有效性。方法:在2021年6月22日至6月30日期间,使用Medline、CINAHL和ERIC数据库进行系统文献综述,以确定脑瘫患者CO-OP的研究。结果:检索到44条引用,其中8项研究符合资格。5项为观察性研究(5项单病例实验设计中的3项),3项为随机对照试验(rct),测量了CO-OP对100名脑瘫患者的影响。由于CO-OP被重新用于脑瘫,最初的研究侧重于可行性、可接受性和儿科围产期儿童健康杂志2021;5 (3): 177-193 DOI: 10.26502/jppch.74050077儿科学,围产期和儿童健康杂志178初步疗效,因此样本量小,偏倚风险高。随机对照试验的综合结果表明,CO-OP比身体功能和结构干预更能实现目标(标准化平均差0.86[95%置信区间0.20-1.52])。结论:研究结果表明,与身体功能和结构干预相比,CO-OP治疗脑瘫的初步疗效,CO-OP与其他基于活动的干预具有相当的疗效。更多具有足够功效的临床试验和个体患者荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
De Novo Crohn's Disease Diagnosed in the Setting of Acute SARS-Cov-2 Infection Requiring Escalation of Infliximab Therapy Guided by Personalized Pharmacokinetics. Occupational dermatoses in health care personnel using PPE during the COVID pandemic. Correlation between Serum Testosterone Level and Erythrocytosis in Adolescent Males- A Cross-Sectional Study Real-World HbF Status in Sickle Cell Disease from an Endemic Zone A Rare Case of Childhood Hepatitis A Infection with Bilateral Pleural Effusion Acalculous Cholecystitis and Massive Ascites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1