Infant Mortality among Twins from the Pelotas 2004 and 2015 Birth Cohorts

Iná S. Santos, Neiva Cristina J Valle, Mariangela F Silveira, A. Matijasevich, Andréa D Bertoldi, M. Domingues, Gabriel Santana, Ivete Maria Kreutz, Fernando CF Barros
{"title":"Infant Mortality among Twins from the Pelotas 2004 and 2015 Birth Cohorts","authors":"Iná S. Santos, Neiva Cristina J Valle, Mariangela F Silveira, A. Matijasevich, Andréa D Bertoldi, M. Domingues, Gabriel Santana, Ivete Maria Kreutz, Fernando CF Barros","doi":"10.26502/jppch.74050095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe the prevalence of multiple pregnancies and compare firstand second-born twins to each other and to singletons, in terms of infant mortality. Methods: The 2004 and 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohorts are population-based studies conducted in Pelotas, South Brazil. A monitoring system was assembled to detect all deaths of cohort participants in the first year of life. Infant Mortality Rate (IMR):1000 live births (LB) and its components (neonatal and post-neonatal mortality rates) were calculated. Results: Among 4,187 pregnancies in 2004 and 4,220 in 2015, respectively, 42 (1.0%) and 56 (1.3%) J Pediatr Perinatol Child Health 2022; 6 (1): 115-128 DOI: 10.26502/jppch.74050095 Journal of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 116 were multiple. Eighty-four twins were born alive in 2004 and 111 in 2015. The majority of twin pregnancies failed to reach 37 weeks (61.9% in 2004 and 82.2% in 2015). Prevalence of twin births < 34 weeks of gestation more than doubled from 2004 (19.0%) to 2015 (42.1%) (p=0.03). In the 2004 cohort, there were 79 infant deaths, three of which were twins, and in the 2015 cohort, among the 57 deaths, five were of twins. In the 2004 cohort there was no difference in IMR between twins and singletons. In the 2015 cohort, IMR in first-born twins was similar to that of singletons, whereas among second-born twins, the IMR was six times higher than in singletons (75.4:1,000 LB versus 12.5:1000 LB). Conclusion: While improvements in medical care may have led to improved survival among infants born at less than 34 weeks, these infants are still at increased risk of dying before reaching one year of age.","PeriodicalId":73894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jppch.74050095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the prevalence of multiple pregnancies and compare firstand second-born twins to each other and to singletons, in terms of infant mortality. Methods: The 2004 and 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohorts are population-based studies conducted in Pelotas, South Brazil. A monitoring system was assembled to detect all deaths of cohort participants in the first year of life. Infant Mortality Rate (IMR):1000 live births (LB) and its components (neonatal and post-neonatal mortality rates) were calculated. Results: Among 4,187 pregnancies in 2004 and 4,220 in 2015, respectively, 42 (1.0%) and 56 (1.3%) J Pediatr Perinatol Child Health 2022; 6 (1): 115-128 DOI: 10.26502/jppch.74050095 Journal of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 116 were multiple. Eighty-four twins were born alive in 2004 and 111 in 2015. The majority of twin pregnancies failed to reach 37 weeks (61.9% in 2004 and 82.2% in 2015). Prevalence of twin births < 34 weeks of gestation more than doubled from 2004 (19.0%) to 2015 (42.1%) (p=0.03). In the 2004 cohort, there were 79 infant deaths, three of which were twins, and in the 2015 cohort, among the 57 deaths, five were of twins. In the 2004 cohort there was no difference in IMR between twins and singletons. In the 2015 cohort, IMR in first-born twins was similar to that of singletons, whereas among second-born twins, the IMR was six times higher than in singletons (75.4:1,000 LB versus 12.5:1000 LB). Conclusion: While improvements in medical care may have led to improved survival among infants born at less than 34 weeks, these infants are still at increased risk of dying before reaching one year of age.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2004年和2015年佩洛塔斯出生队列双胞胎婴儿死亡率
目的:描述多胎妊娠的患病率,并比较第一胎、第二胎和单胎的婴儿死亡率。方法:2004年和2015年佩洛塔斯出生队列是在巴西南部佩洛塔斯进行的基于人口的研究。建立了一个监测系统,以检测队列参与者在生命第一年的所有死亡。婴儿死亡率(IMR):计算1,000活产婴儿(LB)及其组成部分(新生儿和新生儿后期死亡率)。结果:在2004年4187例妊娠和2015年4220例妊娠中,分别有42例(1.0%)和56例(1.3%)[J]儿科围产期儿童健康2022;6 (1): 115-128 DOI: 10.26502/jppch.74050095《儿科学、围产期和儿童健康杂志》116篇。2004年有84对双胞胎活产,2015年有111对。大多数双胎妊娠未能达到37周(2004年为61.9%,2015年为82.2%)。从2004年(19.0%)到2015年(42.1%),< 34孕周的双胞胎患病率增加了一倍多(p=0.03)。在2004年的队列中,有79名婴儿死亡,其中3名是双胞胎,而在2015年的队列中,57名死亡中有5名是双胞胎。在2004年的队列中,双胞胎和单胎之间的IMR没有差异。在2015年的队列中,头胎双胞胎的IMR与单胎相似,而二胎双胞胎的IMR比单胎高6倍(75.4:1000 LB对12.5:1000 LB)。结论:虽然医疗保健的改善可能提高了34周以下出生婴儿的存活率,但这些婴儿在一岁前死亡的风险仍在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
De Novo Crohn's Disease Diagnosed in the Setting of Acute SARS-Cov-2 Infection Requiring Escalation of Infliximab Therapy Guided by Personalized Pharmacokinetics. Occupational dermatoses in health care personnel using PPE during the COVID pandemic. Correlation between Serum Testosterone Level and Erythrocytosis in Adolescent Males- A Cross-Sectional Study Real-World HbF Status in Sickle Cell Disease from an Endemic Zone A Rare Case of Childhood Hepatitis A Infection with Bilateral Pleural Effusion Acalculous Cholecystitis and Massive Ascites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1