Peri-conceptional folic acid supplementation: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Awareness, Knowledge, Use and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Two Secondary Health Care Facilities, Southwest Region, Cameroon

Confidence A. Alemajo, Gregory E. Halle-Ekane, Elvis A. Nkengasong, Emmanuel A. Asongalem
{"title":"Peri-conceptional folic acid supplementation: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Awareness, Knowledge, Use and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Two Secondary Health Care Facilities, Southwest Region, Cameroon","authors":"Confidence A. Alemajo, Gregory E. Halle-Ekane, Elvis A. Nkengasong, Emmanuel A. Asongalem","doi":"10.26502/ogr098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neural tube defects(NTDs) are among the most common birth defects, contributing to miscarriages, infant mortality, severe congenital abnormalities, and serious disabilities. The protective effect of peri-conceptional folic acid (PFA) supplementation in reducing the risk of NTDs and other adverse pregnancy outcomes has been scientifically confirmed. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered to 393 pregnant women seeking routine antenatal care between February to April 2020. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model factors associated with awareness, knowledge, and use of PFA. Results: Approximately 55% of women reported that they had heard of folic acid and only 6.1% had knowledge of folic acid (its benefit in preventing birth defects and the appropriate time to start using it). However, only 5.1% reported that they started using folic acid before pregnancy. Folic acid awareness showed a significant relationship with university education and above (OR=4.30, 95% CI [2.60, 7.30], P<0.001). There was also a significant difference in the odds of knowledge among those with a university education and above (OR=5.06, 95% CI [1.65, 19.0], P=0.0076). There was a statistically significant difference in the odds of awareness and knowledge of folic acid among women who had a history of folic acid education from a healthcare provider before pregnancy compared to those who did not, (OR=23.7, 95% CI [4.84, 430], P=0.002), (OR=12.0, 95% CI [4.31, 35.1], P<0.001) respectively. Even though women who planned their pregnancy (OR=4.89,","PeriodicalId":74336,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/ogr098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Neural tube defects(NTDs) are among the most common birth defects, contributing to miscarriages, infant mortality, severe congenital abnormalities, and serious disabilities. The protective effect of peri-conceptional folic acid (PFA) supplementation in reducing the risk of NTDs and other adverse pregnancy outcomes has been scientifically confirmed. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered to 393 pregnant women seeking routine antenatal care between February to April 2020. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model factors associated with awareness, knowledge, and use of PFA. Results: Approximately 55% of women reported that they had heard of folic acid and only 6.1% had knowledge of folic acid (its benefit in preventing birth defects and the appropriate time to start using it). However, only 5.1% reported that they started using folic acid before pregnancy. Folic acid awareness showed a significant relationship with university education and above (OR=4.30, 95% CI [2.60, 7.30], P<0.001). There was also a significant difference in the odds of knowledge among those with a university education and above (OR=5.06, 95% CI [1.65, 19.0], P=0.0076). There was a statistically significant difference in the odds of awareness and knowledge of folic acid among women who had a history of folic acid education from a healthcare provider before pregnancy compared to those who did not, (OR=23.7, 95% CI [4.84, 430], P=0.002), (OR=12.0, 95% CI [4.31, 35.1], P<0.001) respectively. Even though women who planned their pregnancy (OR=4.89,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围孕期补充叶酸:一项评估在喀麦隆西南地区两家二级卫生保健机构接受产前护理的孕妇的意识、知识、使用和相关因素的横断面研究
背景:神经管缺陷(NTDs)是最常见的出生缺陷之一,可导致流产、婴儿死亡、严重先天性异常和严重残疾。围孕期补充叶酸(PFA)在降低NTDs风险和其他不良妊娠结局方面的保护作用已得到科学证实。方法:采用结构化问卷对2020年2月至4月期间寻求常规产前保健的393名孕妇进行横断面研究。多变量逻辑回归用于模拟与PFA的意识、知识和使用相关的因素。结果:大约55%的女性报告说她们听说过叶酸,只有6.1%的女性了解叶酸(它在预防出生缺陷和开始使用叶酸的适当时间方面的好处)。然而,只有5.1%的人报告说她们在怀孕前开始服用叶酸。叶酸意识与大学及以上教育程度有显著关系(OR=4.30, 95% CI [2.60, 7.30], P<0.001)。大学及以上学历人群的知识知晓率也存在显著差异(OR=5.06, 95% CI [1.65, 19.0], P=0.0076)。怀孕前接受过医疗保健提供者叶酸教育的妇女与未接受过医疗保健提供者叶酸教育的妇女相比,对叶酸的认识和知识的几率有统计学意义的差异(OR=23.7, 95% CI [4.84, 430], P=0.002), OR=12.0, 95% CI [4.31, 35.1], P<0.001)。即使计划怀孕的女性(OR=4.89),
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sex-Specific Dysregulation of Placental Lipid Metabolism in Preeclampsia. Polyclonal Anti-D Antibodies Significantly Reduce the Rate of Miscarriages in Rh(D) positive Women with Recurrent Pregnancy loss. Exosomal Lipid Biomarkers of Oligodendrocyte Pathology to Predict Scoliosis in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Neonatal Effects of Maternal Supplementation with Docosahexaenoic Acid and Lactoferrin on the Fetal Brain and Placenta in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction Effect of Forkhead Box Protein 3 Gene Polymorphisms in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1