Monetary policy strategies of the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve bank of the United States

IF 1 3区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Journal of Post Keynesian Economics Pub Date : 2006-04-01 DOI:10.2753/PKE0160-3477280305
C. Sardoni, L. Wray
{"title":"Monetary policy strategies of the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve bank of the United States","authors":"C. Sardoni, L. Wray","doi":"10.2753/PKE0160-3477280305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the debate on monetary policy strategies on the two sides of the Atlantic, it is now almost commonplace to contrast the Fed and the European Central Bank (ECB) by pointing out the flexibility and capacity to adjust of the former and the rigidity and extreme caution of the latter, and its obsession with low inflation. In looking at the foundations of the two banks' strategies, however, we do not find differences that can provide a simple explanation for their divergent behavior, nor, above all, for the very different economic performance in the United States and Euroland in recent years. Not surprisingly, both central banks share the same conviction that money is neutral in the long run, and even their short-term policies are based on similar fundamental principles. The two policy approaches really differ only in terms of implementation, timing, competence, and so on, but not in terms of the underlying theoretical orientation. We then draw the conclusion that monetary policy cannot represent a significant variable in the explanation of the different economic performances of Euroland and the United States. The two economic areas' differences must be explained by considering other factors, among which the most important is fiscal policy.","PeriodicalId":47197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"451 - 472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/PKE0160-3477280305","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Post Keynesian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477280305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

In the debate on monetary policy strategies on the two sides of the Atlantic, it is now almost commonplace to contrast the Fed and the European Central Bank (ECB) by pointing out the flexibility and capacity to adjust of the former and the rigidity and extreme caution of the latter, and its obsession with low inflation. In looking at the foundations of the two banks' strategies, however, we do not find differences that can provide a simple explanation for their divergent behavior, nor, above all, for the very different economic performance in the United States and Euroland in recent years. Not surprisingly, both central banks share the same conviction that money is neutral in the long run, and even their short-term policies are based on similar fundamental principles. The two policy approaches really differ only in terms of implementation, timing, competence, and so on, but not in terms of the underlying theoretical orientation. We then draw the conclusion that monetary policy cannot represent a significant variable in the explanation of the different economic performances of Euroland and the United States. The two economic areas' differences must be explained by considering other factors, among which the most important is fiscal policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲中央银行和美国联邦储备银行的货币政策策略
在大西洋两岸关于货币政策策略的辩论中,将美联储和欧洲央行(ECB)进行对比,指出前者的灵活性和调整能力,而后者的僵化和极端谨慎,以及对低通胀的执着,这几乎是司空见惯的事。然而,在研究两家银行战略的基础时,我们并没有发现可以简单解释其不同行为的差异,尤其是美国和欧洲近年来截然不同的经济表现。毫不奇怪,两家央行都有同样的信念,即长期来看货币是中性的,甚至它们的短期政策也基于类似的基本原则。实际上,这两种政策方法只是在实施、时机、能力等方面有所不同,而在背后的理论取向上并无不同。然后我们得出结论,货币政策不能代表一个显著变量在解释不同的经济表现的欧洲和美国。这两个经济领域的差异必须通过考虑其他因素来解释,其中最重要的是财政政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Post Keynesian Economics is a scholarly journal of innovative theoretical and empirical work that sheds fresh light on contemporary economic problems. It is committed to the principle that cumulative development of economic theory is only possible when the theory is continuously subjected to scrutiny in terms of its ability both to explain the real world and to provide a reliable guide to public policy.
期刊最新文献
Joseph Schumpeter, Allyn Young, and the future of capitalism Extending the “principle of effective demand” – did Keynes produce an ad hoc tautology? An empirical analysis of the relationship between real wage appreciation and inflation in Brazil Medical expenditures and the measurement of poverty in the United States Theorizing the process of financialization through the paradox of profit: the credit-debt reproduction mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1