Efficacy and effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions in emergencies in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Q4 Environmental Science Waterlines Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.3362/1756-3488.17-00016
T. Yates, J. Vujcic, M. Joseph, K. Gallandat, D. Lantagne
{"title":"Efficacy and effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions in emergencies in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review","authors":"T. Yates, J. Vujcic, M. Joseph, K. Gallandat, D. Lantagne","doi":"10.3362/1756-3488.17-00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are increasing numbers of people affected by natural disasters, disease outbreaks, and conflict. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions are used in nearly all emergency responses to help reduce disease risk. However, there is a lack of summarized evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions. We conducted a systematic review of the published and grey literature on the efficacy and effectiveness of short-term WASH interventions in emergency response in low- and middle-income countries, including: developing theory of change models; setting inclusion criteria; conducting the search; selecting evaluations for inclusion; assessing the quality of the evidence; and analysing the included evaluations. Overall, 15,026 documents were identified and 106 studies describing 114 evaluations met inclusion criteria. Interventions from 39 countries were included. Most included evaluations (77 per cent) had high risk of bias and half were from grey literature (50 per cent). For the m...","PeriodicalId":39265,"journal":{"name":"Waterlines","volume":"37 1","pages":"31-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3362/1756-3488.17-00016","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waterlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.17-00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

There are increasing numbers of people affected by natural disasters, disease outbreaks, and conflict. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions are used in nearly all emergency responses to help reduce disease risk. However, there is a lack of summarized evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions. We conducted a systematic review of the published and grey literature on the efficacy and effectiveness of short-term WASH interventions in emergency response in low- and middle-income countries, including: developing theory of change models; setting inclusion criteria; conducting the search; selecting evaluations for inclusion; assessing the quality of the evidence; and analysing the included evaluations. Overall, 15,026 documents were identified and 106 studies describing 114 evaluations met inclusion criteria. Interventions from 39 countries were included. Most included evaluations (77 per cent) had high risk of bias and half were from grey literature (50 per cent). For the m...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入和中等收入国家紧急情况中水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施的效力和效果:系统回顾
越来越多的人受到自然灾害、疾病爆发和冲突的影响。水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施几乎被用于所有应急响应,以帮助降低疾病风险。然而,缺乏关于这些干预措施的功效和有效性的总结证据。我们对低收入和中等收入国家应急反应中短期讲卫生运动干预措施的功效和有效性的已发表文献和灰色文献进行了系统审查,包括:发展变革理论模型;制定纳入标准;进行搜索;选择评价纳入;评估证据的质量;并对纳入的评价进行分析。总共有15026份文献被确定,106项研究描述了114项评估符合纳入标准。包括来自39个国家的干预措施。大多数纳入的评估(77%)有很高的偏倚风险,一半来自灰色文献(50%)。对我来说……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waterlines
Waterlines Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Published since 1982 Waterlines is a refereed journal providing a forum for those involved in extending water supply, sanitation, hygiene and waste management to all in developing countries. Waterlines aims to bridge the gap between research and practice: it encourages papers written by researchers for the benefit of practice and those written by practitioners to inform research and policy. It highlights information sources and promotes debate between different perspectives. Waterlines considers the key challenges facing those in the water and sanitation sector–engineers, health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Waterlines – the final editorial Can a citizen-science approach to collecting data assist the management of intermittent water supply in low-income and data-scarce settings? Child-centred methods for school-based WASH interventions: co-creating sanitation research and interventions for and with children Assessing climate impacts on gender and socially inclusive WASH: lessons from a research-practice project Educating sanitation professionals: moving from STEM to specialist training in higher education in Malawi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1