Linkage between water, sanitation, hygiene, and child health in Bugesera District, Rwanda: a cross-sectional study

Q4 Environmental Science Waterlines Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3362/1756-3488.20-00008
Théoneste Ntakirutimana, Bethesda O'Connell, M. Quinn, P. Scheuerman, Maurice Kwizera, F. Sunday, I. Ozodiegwu, V. Mbarushimana, Gasana Seka Heka Franck, Rubuga Kitema Felix
{"title":"Linkage between water, sanitation, hygiene, and child health in Bugesera District, Rwanda: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Théoneste Ntakirutimana, Bethesda O'Connell, M. Quinn, P. Scheuerman, Maurice Kwizera, F. Sunday, I. Ozodiegwu, V. Mbarushimana, Gasana Seka Heka Franck, Rubuga Kitema Felix","doi":"10.3362/1756-3488.20-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rwanda met the Millennium Development Goal targets for access to drinking water and sanitation. However, the WASH practices of high-risk communities are undocumented. Lack of information may hide disparities that correlate with disease. The purpose of this study was to assess WASH and childhood diarrhoea in Bugesera District. A survey was administered to caregivers. Water and stool samples were collected to assess physical and biological characteristics. Focus groups provided information on community context. Analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, logistic regression, and thematic analysis. Piped water and unimproved sanitation were used by 45.28 per cent and 88.38 per cent of respondents. Most respondents (51.47 per cent) travelled 30–60 minutes per trip for water and 70 per cent lacked access to hand-washing near the latrine. Diarrhoea was less prevalent in children who used a toilet facility (p = 0.009). Disposal of faeces anywhere other than the toilet increased the odds of having diarrhoea (OR = 3.1, 95 per cent CI = 1.2–8.2). Use of a narrow mouth container for storage was associated with decreased intestinal parasites (p = 0.011). The presence of a hand-washing station within 10 metres of the toilet was associated with lower odds of intestinal parasites (OR = 0.54, 95 per cent CI: 0.29–0.99). Water and sanitation access, water handling and storage, and unsanitary household environment underlie high diarrhoeal disease prevalence.","PeriodicalId":39265,"journal":{"name":"Waterlines","volume":"40 1","pages":"44-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waterlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.20-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Rwanda met the Millennium Development Goal targets for access to drinking water and sanitation. However, the WASH practices of high-risk communities are undocumented. Lack of information may hide disparities that correlate with disease. The purpose of this study was to assess WASH and childhood diarrhoea in Bugesera District. A survey was administered to caregivers. Water and stool samples were collected to assess physical and biological characteristics. Focus groups provided information on community context. Analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, logistic regression, and thematic analysis. Piped water and unimproved sanitation were used by 45.28 per cent and 88.38 per cent of respondents. Most respondents (51.47 per cent) travelled 30–60 minutes per trip for water and 70 per cent lacked access to hand-washing near the latrine. Diarrhoea was less prevalent in children who used a toilet facility (p = 0.009). Disposal of faeces anywhere other than the toilet increased the odds of having diarrhoea (OR = 3.1, 95 per cent CI = 1.2–8.2). Use of a narrow mouth container for storage was associated with decreased intestinal parasites (p = 0.011). The presence of a hand-washing station within 10 metres of the toilet was associated with lower odds of intestinal parasites (OR = 0.54, 95 per cent CI: 0.29–0.99). Water and sanitation access, water handling and storage, and unsanitary household environment underlie high diarrhoeal disease prevalence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卢旺达Bugesera区的水、环境卫生、个人卫生和儿童健康之间的联系:一项横断面研究
卢旺达实现了千年发展目标中关于获得饮用水和卫生设施的具体目标。然而,高风险社区的讲卫生实践没有记录。缺乏信息可能会掩盖与疾病相关的差异。这项研究的目的是评估布格塞拉地区的讲卫生运动和儿童腹泻。对护理人员进行了一项调查。收集水和粪便样本以评估物理和生物特征。焦点小组提供了关于社区情况的资料。分析包括描述性统计、卡方、逻辑回归和专题分析。45.28%和88.38%的受访者使用自来水和未经改善的卫生设施。大多数答复者(51.47%)每次取水需要30-60分钟,70%的人在厕所附近缺乏洗手设施。使用厕所设施的儿童腹泻发病率较低(p = 0.009)。在厕所以外的任何地方处理粪便增加了患腹泻的几率(OR = 3.1%, 95% CI = 1.2-8.2)。使用窄口容器储存与肠道寄生虫减少有关(p = 0.011)。在厕所10米范围内设有洗手站与肠道寄生虫的几率较低相关(OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.29-0.99)。水和卫生设施的获取、水的处理和储存以及不卫生的家庭环境是腹泻病高发的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waterlines
Waterlines Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Published since 1982 Waterlines is a refereed journal providing a forum for those involved in extending water supply, sanitation, hygiene and waste management to all in developing countries. Waterlines aims to bridge the gap between research and practice: it encourages papers written by researchers for the benefit of practice and those written by practitioners to inform research and policy. It highlights information sources and promotes debate between different perspectives. Waterlines considers the key challenges facing those in the water and sanitation sector–engineers, health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Waterlines – the final editorial Can a citizen-science approach to collecting data assist the management of intermittent water supply in low-income and data-scarce settings? Child-centred methods for school-based WASH interventions: co-creating sanitation research and interventions for and with children Assessing climate impacts on gender and socially inclusive WASH: lessons from a research-practice project Educating sanitation professionals: moving from STEM to specialist training in higher education in Malawi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1