Molecular Diagnosis and Evolutionary Relationship Analysis Of Plant Parasitic Tea Garden Nematodes From Different Tea Estates In Sylhet Region of Bangladesh

M. Siddique, T. Asa, M. Sohag, M. Chowdhury, A. Iqbal, K. Islam
{"title":"Molecular Diagnosis and Evolutionary Relationship Analysis Of Plant Parasitic Tea Garden Nematodes From Different Tea Estates In Sylhet Region of Bangladesh","authors":"M. Siddique, T. Asa, M. Sohag, M. Chowdhury, A. Iqbal, K. Islam","doi":"10.3329/jbs.v29i0.54826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nematodes from plant-parasitic sources are ever-present and incidental to plant growth as well as crop production. The damage of tea gardens caused by nematode is often non-specific and easily confused with symptoms. The present study determined the parasitic and non-parasitic nematodes population in different tea gardens of the Sylhet region by their morphological and partial molecular characterization. Out of 13 tea gardens, it was observed that BTRI, Karimpur, Mathiura, and Tarapur tea garden has the highest number of parasitic and non-parasitic nematodes. After PCR amplification, DNA bands with desired amplicon size were detected by gel electrophoresis. Among thirteen soil samples, nematodes from Malnichara, Karimpur, BTRI, Mathiura , and Finlay had partially confirmed the presence of rootknot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.), root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus brachyurus), burrowing nematode (Radopholus similis), reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) and lance nematode (Hoplolaimus columbus) consequently based on approximately base pair of 1.7, 1.1 and 0.52 kb (different Meloidogyne spp.) 0.52, 0.52, 0.25 and 2.3 kb of specific genes. From evolutionary analysis, it might be said that Meloidogyne species are strongly related with each other making clusters except Meloidogyne natalie where this one is closely related with Hoplolaimus columbus in their evolutionary relationship as remaining others (Rotylenchulus reniformis, Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus brachyurus) are in different clusters in the same clade and this result could be confirmed after sequencing. J. Bio-Sci. 29(1): 101-109, 2021 (June)","PeriodicalId":90580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of bio-science","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of bio-science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v29i0.54826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nematodes from plant-parasitic sources are ever-present and incidental to plant growth as well as crop production. The damage of tea gardens caused by nematode is often non-specific and easily confused with symptoms. The present study determined the parasitic and non-parasitic nematodes population in different tea gardens of the Sylhet region by their morphological and partial molecular characterization. Out of 13 tea gardens, it was observed that BTRI, Karimpur, Mathiura, and Tarapur tea garden has the highest number of parasitic and non-parasitic nematodes. After PCR amplification, DNA bands with desired amplicon size were detected by gel electrophoresis. Among thirteen soil samples, nematodes from Malnichara, Karimpur, BTRI, Mathiura , and Finlay had partially confirmed the presence of rootknot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.), root-lesion nematode (Pratylenchus brachyurus), burrowing nematode (Radopholus similis), reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) and lance nematode (Hoplolaimus columbus) consequently based on approximately base pair of 1.7, 1.1 and 0.52 kb (different Meloidogyne spp.) 0.52, 0.52, 0.25 and 2.3 kb of specific genes. From evolutionary analysis, it might be said that Meloidogyne species are strongly related with each other making clusters except Meloidogyne natalie where this one is closely related with Hoplolaimus columbus in their evolutionary relationship as remaining others (Rotylenchulus reniformis, Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus brachyurus) are in different clusters in the same clade and this result could be confirmed after sequencing. J. Bio-Sci. 29(1): 101-109, 2021 (June)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国Sylhet地区不同茶园植物寄生线虫的分子诊断和进化关系分析
来自植物寄生源的线虫是无处不在的,是植物生长和作物生产的附带产物。线虫对茶园造成的损害往往是非特异性的,容易与症状相混淆。本研究通过形态和部分分子特征测定了锡尔赫特地区不同茶园的寄生线虫和非寄生线虫种群。在13个茶园中,BTRI、Karimpur、Mathiura和Tarapur茶园的寄生和非寄生线虫数量最多。PCR扩增后,用凝胶电泳检测所需扩增子大小的DNA条带。在13个土壤样本中,Malnichara、Karimpur、BTRI、Mathiura和Finlay的线虫部分确认了根结线虫(Meloidogyne spp.)、根伤线虫(Pratylenchus brachyurus)、穴洞线虫(Radopholus similis)、梨形线虫(Rotylenchulus reniformis)和长条线虫(Hoplolaimus columbus)的存在,基于大约1.7、1.1和0.52 kb的碱基对(不同的Meloidogyne spp.) 0.52、0.52、0.25和2.3 kb的特异性基因。从进化分析来看,除了Meloidogyne natalie与Hoplolaimus columbus在进化关系上关系密切外,其余的(Rotylenchulus reniformis, Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus brachyurus)在同一进化枝上属于不同的类群,这一结果可以通过测序来证实。Bio-Sci。29(1): 101-109, 2021 (6)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Management Against Fruit Fly And Borer By Bagging Systems In Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) First Report Of Fusarium Fruit Rot Causing Fusarium Incarnatum-equiseti On Amla In Bangladesh Bacterial Pneumonia And Its Association With Chronic Periodontal Disease Among The Patients Attending At Barind Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi Antidiarrheal Efficacy Of Azithromycin-loaded Solid Dispersion In Escherichia Coli-induced Diarrheagenic Mice Influence Of Plant Growth Regulators On Efficient Callus Induction And Regeneration Using Five Rice Genotypes In Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1