Bede and Irish Scholarship: Scientific Treatises and Grammars

Q1 Arts and Humanities Eriu Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3318/ERIU.2004.54.1.139
J. Picard
{"title":"Bede and Irish Scholarship: Scientific Treatises and Grammars","authors":"J. Picard","doi":"10.3318/ERIU.2004.54.1.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper revisits the question of Bede's debt to Irish scholarship. It attempts to show exactly which texts of Irish origin Bede used, not only in his scientific treatises but also in his exegetical works, and, perhaps more importantly, how he used them. He seems to have appreciated the synthetic approach of the Irish masters, but did not hesitate to query their scholarship, supplementing their information with classical and Patristic texts. On the other hand, he failed to understand their humour and is found to be led astray by the witticisms of Virgilius Maro Grammaticus. Although Bede does not acknowledge any of Irish masters, his attitude toward the Irish may not have been as negative as it would appear from a modern standpoint.","PeriodicalId":38655,"journal":{"name":"Eriu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eriu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3318/ERIU.2004.54.1.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This paper revisits the question of Bede's debt to Irish scholarship. It attempts to show exactly which texts of Irish origin Bede used, not only in his scientific treatises but also in his exegetical works, and, perhaps more importantly, how he used them. He seems to have appreciated the synthetic approach of the Irish masters, but did not hesitate to query their scholarship, supplementing their information with classical and Patristic texts. On the other hand, he failed to understand their humour and is found to be led astray by the witticisms of Virgilius Maro Grammaticus. Although Bede does not acknowledge any of Irish masters, his attitude toward the Irish may not have been as negative as it would appear from a modern standpoint.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比德和爱尔兰学术:科学论文和语法
摘要:本文重新审视比德对爱尔兰学术的亏欠问题。它试图准确地展示比德使用了哪些爱尔兰文本,不仅在他的科学论文中,而且在他的训诂著作中,也许更重要的是,他是如何使用它们的。他似乎很欣赏爱尔兰大师的综合方法,但毫不犹豫地质疑他们的学术,用古典和教父的文本补充他们的信息。另一方面,他无法理解他们的幽默,被弗吉利乌斯·马罗·格拉马迪库斯的俏皮话引入歧途。虽然比德不承认任何爱尔兰大师,但他对爱尔兰人的态度可能并不像现代人所看到的那样消极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eriu
Eriu Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Dislighe luirg Old Irish Námae 'Enemy' and the Celtic NT-Stems Imtheachta Aeniasa’s lúirecha re-visited Paradigm Splits and Hiatus Forms: The Origins of Modern Irish Sceach and Scottish Gaelic Sgitheach 'Thorn Tree', and the Old Irish Precursor of Scottish Gaelic Dìthean 'Flower' Gofraidh Óg Mac An Bhaird Cecinit: 7. Treóin An Cheannais Clann Dálaigh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1