Clinical results of autologous bone augmentation harvested from the mandibular ramus prior to implant placement. An analysis of 104 cases

A. Sakkas, Konstantinidis Ioannis, K. Winter, A. Schramm, F. Wilde
{"title":"Clinical results of autologous bone augmentation harvested from the mandibular ramus prior to implant placement. An analysis of 104 cases","authors":"A. Sakkas, Konstantinidis Ioannis, K. Winter, A. Schramm, F. Wilde","doi":"10.3205/iprs000100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study was the evaluation of the clinical success and complication rates associated with autologous bone grafts harvested from the mandibular ramus for alveolar ridge augmentation and the identification of possible risk factors for graft failure. Methods: In a consecutive retrospective study 86 patients could be included. In these patients a total of 104 bone grafts from the mandibular ramus were harvested for alveolar ridge augmentation. Medical history, age of patient, smoking status, periodontal status and complications were recorded. The need for bone grafting was defined by the impossibility of installing dental implants of adequate length or diameter to fulfill prosthetic requirements, or for aesthetic reasons. The surgical outcome was evaluated concerning complications at the donor or at the recipient site, risk factors associated with the complications and graft survival. All patients were treated using a two-stage technique. In the first operation bone blocks harvested from the retromolar region were placed as lateral or vertical onlay grafts using augmentation templates and were fixed with titanium osteosynthesis screws after exposure of the deficient alveolar ridge. After a healing period of 3–5 months computed tomography scans were performed followed by virtual implant planning and the implants were inserted using guided dental implantation. Results: 97 of the 104 onlay bone grafts were successful. In only 7 patients a graft failure occurred after a postsurgical complication. No long-term nerve damage occurred. Postoperative nerve disturbances were reported by 11 patients and had temporary character only. After the healing period between 4 to 5 months, 155 implants were placed (39 in the maxilla, 116 in the mandible). A final rehabilitation with dental implants was possible in 82 of the 86 patients. Except the 7 graft failures, all recorded complications were minor complications which could be easily treated successfully without any long-term problems. Complications at the donor site were recorded in 3 patients and 17 patients experienced complications at the recipient site. Three of 7 patients with graft failure, were secondarily augmented with a new retromolar graft, harvested from the contra-lateral site and dental implants could be successfully inserted later. No association between complications and smoking habit, age of patient, jaw area, and dental situation (tooth gap or free dental arch) could be detected. Conclusions: Retromolar bone grafts are an effective and safe method for the reconstruction of small- to medium-sized alveolar defects of the maxilla and mandible prior to dental implantation and show a low graft failure rate.","PeriodicalId":43347,"journal":{"name":"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/iprs000100","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was the evaluation of the clinical success and complication rates associated with autologous bone grafts harvested from the mandibular ramus for alveolar ridge augmentation and the identification of possible risk factors for graft failure. Methods: In a consecutive retrospective study 86 patients could be included. In these patients a total of 104 bone grafts from the mandibular ramus were harvested for alveolar ridge augmentation. Medical history, age of patient, smoking status, periodontal status and complications were recorded. The need for bone grafting was defined by the impossibility of installing dental implants of adequate length or diameter to fulfill prosthetic requirements, or for aesthetic reasons. The surgical outcome was evaluated concerning complications at the donor or at the recipient site, risk factors associated with the complications and graft survival. All patients were treated using a two-stage technique. In the first operation bone blocks harvested from the retromolar region were placed as lateral or vertical onlay grafts using augmentation templates and were fixed with titanium osteosynthesis screws after exposure of the deficient alveolar ridge. After a healing period of 3–5 months computed tomography scans were performed followed by virtual implant planning and the implants were inserted using guided dental implantation. Results: 97 of the 104 onlay bone grafts were successful. In only 7 patients a graft failure occurred after a postsurgical complication. No long-term nerve damage occurred. Postoperative nerve disturbances were reported by 11 patients and had temporary character only. After the healing period between 4 to 5 months, 155 implants were placed (39 in the maxilla, 116 in the mandible). A final rehabilitation with dental implants was possible in 82 of the 86 patients. Except the 7 graft failures, all recorded complications were minor complications which could be easily treated successfully without any long-term problems. Complications at the donor site were recorded in 3 patients and 17 patients experienced complications at the recipient site. Three of 7 patients with graft failure, were secondarily augmented with a new retromolar graft, harvested from the contra-lateral site and dental implants could be successfully inserted later. No association between complications and smoking habit, age of patient, jaw area, and dental situation (tooth gap or free dental arch) could be detected. Conclusions: Retromolar bone grafts are an effective and safe method for the reconstruction of small- to medium-sized alveolar defects of the maxilla and mandible prior to dental implantation and show a low graft failure rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下颌支自体骨增强体植入前的临床效果。104例病例分析
背景:本研究的目的是评估下颌支自体骨移植用于牙槽嵴增强的临床成功率和并发症发生率,并确定移植失败的可能危险因素。方法:在一项连续的回顾性研究中,可纳入86例患者。在这些患者中,共有104个来自下颌支的骨移植物被收获用于牙槽嵴增加。记录患者的病史、年龄、吸烟情况、牙周状况及并发症。骨移植的需求被定义为不可能安装足够长度或直径的牙种植体来满足义肢的要求,或者出于美学原因。手术结果评估涉及供体或受体部位的并发症,与并发症和移植物存活相关的危险因素。所有患者均采用两阶段技术治疗。在第一次手术中,从后磨牙区取出的骨块使用增强模板作为横向或垂直嵌板移植物,并在暴露缺损的牙槽嵴后用钛骨固定螺钉固定。愈合3-5个月后进行计算机断层扫描,然后进行虚拟种植计划,并使用引导种植的方法种植种植体。结果:104例中97例移植成功。只有7例患者在术后并发症后发生移植物衰竭。未发生长期神经损伤。术后有11例患者出现暂时性神经障碍。愈合4 ~ 5个月后,放置155个种植体(上颌39个,下颌骨116个)。86例患者中有82例最终通过种植牙实现康复。除7例移植物失败外,所有并发症均为轻微并发症,易于成功治疗,无长期问题。供体部位并发症3例,受体部位并发症17例。7例移植失败的患者中,有3例从对侧位置收获新的后磨牙移植物,随后种植体可以成功种植。并发症与吸烟习惯、患者年龄、颌骨面积、牙齿状况(牙间隙或游离牙弓)无相关性。结论:后磨牙骨移植是种植前修复上颌中小牙槽缺损的一种安全有效的方法,移植失败率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scalp reconstruction with locoregional and free flaps - a retrospective cohort study. Results of a patient survey using an online questionnaire after implant removal for breast implant illness. Acral melanoma of the heel mimicking a pressure sore. Intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee joint with additional femoral neck screw to prevent periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur. A case report. Subtotal diaphyseal replacement of the femur with modular mega-endoprosthesis following interprosthetic fracture. A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1