Fight for Flight: The Narratives of Human Versus Machine Following Two Aviation Tragedies

Q1 Social Sciences HumanMachine Communication Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.30658/hmc.4.2
Andrew Prahl, Rio Kin Ho Leung, Alicia Ning Shan Chua
{"title":"Fight for Flight: The Narratives of Human Versus Machine Following Two Aviation Tragedies","authors":"Andrew Prahl, Rio Kin Ho Leung, Alicia Ning Shan Chua","doi":"10.30658/hmc.4.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides insight into the relationship between human and machine in the professional aviation community following the 737 MAX accidents. Content analysis was conducted on a discussion forum for professional pilots to identify the major topics emerging in discussion of the accidents. A subsequent narrative analysis reveals dominant arguments of human versus machine as zero-sum, surrender to machines, and an epidemic of mistrust. Results are discussed in the context of current issues in human-machine communication, and we discuss what other quickly automating industries can learn from aviation’s experience.","PeriodicalId":34860,"journal":{"name":"HumanMachine Communication Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HumanMachine Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.4.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study provides insight into the relationship between human and machine in the professional aviation community following the 737 MAX accidents. Content analysis was conducted on a discussion forum for professional pilots to identify the major topics emerging in discussion of the accidents. A subsequent narrative analysis reveals dominant arguments of human versus machine as zero-sum, surrender to machines, and an epidemic of mistrust. Results are discussed in the context of current issues in human-machine communication, and we discuss what other quickly automating industries can learn from aviation’s experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为飞行而战:两起航空悲剧后人类与机器的叙事
这项研究为737 MAX事故后专业航空界的人与机器之间的关系提供了见解。在专业飞行员的讨论论坛上进行了内容分析,以确定事故讨论中出现的主要话题。随后的叙事分析揭示了人类与机器的主要争论是零和,向机器投降,以及不信任的流行。在当前人机通信问题的背景下讨论了结果,并讨论了其他快速自动化行业可以从航空业的经验中学到什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Defining Dialogues: Tracing the Evolution of Human-Machine Communication Who is (communicatively more) responsible behind the wheel? Applying the theory of communicative responsibility to TAM in the context of using navigation technology Archipelagic Human-Machine Communication: Building Bridges amidst Cultivated Ambiguity Triggered by Socialbots: Communicative Anthropomorphization of Bots in Online Conversations Boundary Regulation Processes and Privacy Concerns With (Non-)Use of Voice-Based Assistants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1