The Symptom of Ethics; Rethinking Ethics in the Face of the Machine

Q1 Social Sciences HumanMachine Communication Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.30658/hmc.4.4
David J. Gunkel
{"title":"The Symptom of Ethics; Rethinking Ethics in the Face of the Machine","authors":"David J. Gunkel","doi":"10.30658/hmc.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that it is the machine that constitutes the symptom of ethics— “symptom” understood as that excluded “part that has no part” in the system of moral consideration. Ethics, which has been historically organized around a human or at least biological subject, needs the machine to define the proper limits of the moral community even if it simultaneously excludes such mechanisms from any serious claim on moral consideration. The argument will proceed in five steps or movements. The first part will define and characterize “the symptom” as it has been operationalized in the work of Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek. Although Žižek appropriates this term from Jacques Lacan, he develops the concept in a unique way that exceeds Lacan’s initial psychoanalytic formulations. The second and third parts will demonstrate how the machine constitutes the symptom of moral philosophy, showing how and why it comprises the always already excluded element necessary to define the proper limits of moral subjectivity. The fourth part will then consider two alternatives that promise, but ultimately fail, to accommodate this symptom. And the final section will draw out the consequences of this analysis for ethics and its excluded others.","PeriodicalId":34860,"journal":{"name":"HumanMachine Communication Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HumanMachine Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This essay argues that it is the machine that constitutes the symptom of ethics— “symptom” understood as that excluded “part that has no part” in the system of moral consideration. Ethics, which has been historically organized around a human or at least biological subject, needs the machine to define the proper limits of the moral community even if it simultaneously excludes such mechanisms from any serious claim on moral consideration. The argument will proceed in five steps or movements. The first part will define and characterize “the symptom” as it has been operationalized in the work of Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek. Although Žižek appropriates this term from Jacques Lacan, he develops the concept in a unique way that exceeds Lacan’s initial psychoanalytic formulations. The second and third parts will demonstrate how the machine constitutes the symptom of moral philosophy, showing how and why it comprises the always already excluded element necessary to define the proper limits of moral subjectivity. The fourth part will then consider two alternatives that promise, but ultimately fail, to accommodate this symptom. And the final section will draw out the consequences of this analysis for ethics and its excluded others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《伦理的症候》;面对机器重新思考伦理学
本文认为,正是机器构成了伦理的症状——“症状”被理解为在道德考虑体系中排除了“没有部分”。历史上一直围绕人类或至少是生物主体组织的伦理学,需要机器来定义道德共同体的适当界限,即使它同时将这种机制排除在任何严肃的道德考虑之外。辩论将分五个步骤或动作进行。第一部分将定义和描述“症状”,因为它已经在斯洛文尼亚哲学家斯拉沃伊Žižek的工作中运作。虽然Žižek借用了雅克·拉康的这个术语,但他以一种独特的方式发展了这个概念,超越了拉康最初的精神分析公式。第二部分和第三部分将展示机器如何构成道德哲学的症状,展示它如何以及为什么包含了定义道德主体性的适当界限所必需的始终被排除在外的要素。第四部分将考虑两种替代方案,它们有望缓解这种症状,但最终都失败了。最后一节将引出这种分析对伦理学及其被排除在外的其他方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Defining Dialogues: Tracing the Evolution of Human-Machine Communication Who is (communicatively more) responsible behind the wheel? Applying the theory of communicative responsibility to TAM in the context of using navigation technology Archipelagic Human-Machine Communication: Building Bridges amidst Cultivated Ambiguity Triggered by Socialbots: Communicative Anthropomorphization of Bots in Online Conversations Boundary Regulation Processes and Privacy Concerns With (Non-)Use of Voice-Based Assistants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1