The Declaration of Arbroath in print, 1680–1705

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Innes Review Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.3366/inr.2021.0303
R. Mason
{"title":"The Declaration of Arbroath in print, 1680–1705","authors":"R. Mason","doi":"10.3366/inr.2021.0303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the circumstances in which the Declaration of Arbroath was first printed in 1680 by Sir George Mackenzie of Rosehaugh and the original manuscript on which Mackenzie’s text was based (NRS SP13/7). It then traces its subsequent print history between the Revolution of 1689–90 and the Union of Parliaments in 1707 both in Latin and in an English translation that first appeared in 1689. It locates the Declaration within the broader context of whig propaganda that encompassed a defence not just of the Revolution Settlement but of Scottish sovereignty at the time of the Union, culminating in James Anderson’s new edition and translation of the text of 1705. An appendix further examines the earliest reference to the Declaration in print – in Archbishop John Spottiswoode’s History of the Church in Scotland (1655) – and Spottiswoode’s use of a manuscript copy of Walter Bower’s Scotichronicon.","PeriodicalId":42054,"journal":{"name":"Innes Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innes Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/inr.2021.0303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the circumstances in which the Declaration of Arbroath was first printed in 1680 by Sir George Mackenzie of Rosehaugh and the original manuscript on which Mackenzie’s text was based (NRS SP13/7). It then traces its subsequent print history between the Revolution of 1689–90 and the Union of Parliaments in 1707 both in Latin and in an English translation that first appeared in 1689. It locates the Declaration within the broader context of whig propaganda that encompassed a defence not just of the Revolution Settlement but of Scottish sovereignty at the time of the Union, culminating in James Anderson’s new edition and translation of the text of 1705. An appendix further examines the earliest reference to the Declaration in print – in Archbishop John Spottiswoode’s History of the Church in Scotland (1655) – and Spottiswoode’s use of a manuscript copy of Walter Bower’s Scotichronicon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《阿布罗斯宣言》印刷版(1680-1705年
本文考察了1680年罗斯豪的乔治·麦肯齐爵士首次印刷《阿布罗斯宣言》的情况,以及麦肯齐文本所依据的原始手稿(NRS SP13/7)。然后,它追溯了从1689 - 90年革命到1707年议会联盟的后续印刷历史,包括拉丁语和1689年首次出现的英语翻译。它将《独立宣言》置于辉格党宣传的更大背景中,这不仅包括捍卫革命解决方案,还包括捍卫联邦时期的苏格兰主权,最终在詹姆斯·安德森(James Anderson) 1705年的新版和译本中达到高潮。附录进一步研究了最早的关于《独立宣言》的印刷品——大主教约翰·斯波提斯伍德的《苏格兰教会历史》(1655)——以及斯波提斯伍德使用的沃尔特·鲍尔的《苏格兰编年史》手稿副本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Innes Review
Innes Review RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Decretum fuit per burgenses: a fresh perspective on law-making in the medieval Scottish burghs A previous version of the Clashinore Letters Ruth Davidson's Conservatives: The Scottish Tory Party 2011–19, edited by David Torrance Front matter Bernard Aspinwall Prize Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1