Modern financial and economic crises and the stability of the financial and banking system of Ukraine

O. Shust, O. Varchenko, D. Krysanov, O. Dragan, K. Tkachenko
{"title":"Modern financial and economic crises and the stability of the financial and banking system of Ukraine","authors":"O. Shust, O. Varchenko, D. Krysanov, O. Dragan, K. Tkachenko","doi":"10.33245/2310-9262-2021-169-2-130-150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Factors, problems and risks are analyzed and systematized, in particular, technical-technological and innovation backwardness, peculiarities of economic cycles in economic systems of countries at different stages of development, as well as due to increasing competitiveness of some of them in the globalized world. crisis. It is shown that the situation worsens when the world economy grows, and against its background, imbalances in the global financial system are growing and speculative capital is spreading. It is revealed that the first global crisis of 2008–2010 was provoked by the uncontrolled spread of mortgage loans in the US real estate markets and the transfer of these processes to other countries, resulting in \"financial bubbles\", a market crash and a chain reaction involving others. markets. Emphasis is placed on the fact that when Ukraine's economy was in a state of permanent crisis, the domestic banking system withstood all domestic economic, financial, currency and other changes, as well as external turbulence, which provoked the strengthening of negative trends.\nIt is established that the second financial and economic crisis of 2014–2016 is largely due to internal problems: much lower technological structure (third-fourth compared to fifth-sixth in economically developed countries), significant lag of Ukrainian industry in terms of innovation from industry EU countries, a high level of depreciation of fixed assets, much higher resource intensity and lower productivity, unrealistic in a few years to carry out innovative modernization of machine-building industries for the production of means of production. An acute threat has been revealed that the unlimited increase in speculative capital has exacerbated structural imbalances between the real and financial sectors. The main negative consequences of the crisis for the financial and banking system are systematized: they include more than three devaluations of the hryvnia, liquidation of more than a hundred banks and privatization of the largest of them, Privatbank, closure of several thousand banking branches and large–scale unemployment.\nIt is confirmed that the third financial and economic crisis of 2020–2021 has a natural origin – it was caused by the pandemic COVID-19 caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV, and its consequences. It is established that the corona crisis has provoked various negative effects on the work of industry and social services, has caused significant damage to all countries and the vast majority of the world's population. It is shown that Ukraine proved to be more resilient to these troubles and the pre-crisis revival began in the second quarter of this year. It is substantiated that the implementation of macroprudential policy measures aimed at preventing the accumulation and implementation of systemic risks in the financial sector will help increase the stability of the financial and banking system, properly perform its main functions – financial intermediation and payments – and crisis management. It is shown that timely and effective implementation of macroprudential instruments will increase the stability of the national economy and reduce GDP volatility.\nKey words: financial and economic crisis, stability of the financial and banking system, economic cycle, market turbulence, inflation, capital movements, financial markets.","PeriodicalId":53051,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33245/2310-9262-2021-169-2-130-150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Factors, problems and risks are analyzed and systematized, in particular, technical-technological and innovation backwardness, peculiarities of economic cycles in economic systems of countries at different stages of development, as well as due to increasing competitiveness of some of them in the globalized world. crisis. It is shown that the situation worsens when the world economy grows, and against its background, imbalances in the global financial system are growing and speculative capital is spreading. It is revealed that the first global crisis of 2008–2010 was provoked by the uncontrolled spread of mortgage loans in the US real estate markets and the transfer of these processes to other countries, resulting in "financial bubbles", a market crash and a chain reaction involving others. markets. Emphasis is placed on the fact that when Ukraine's economy was in a state of permanent crisis, the domestic banking system withstood all domestic economic, financial, currency and other changes, as well as external turbulence, which provoked the strengthening of negative trends. It is established that the second financial and economic crisis of 2014–2016 is largely due to internal problems: much lower technological structure (third-fourth compared to fifth-sixth in economically developed countries), significant lag of Ukrainian industry in terms of innovation from industry EU countries, a high level of depreciation of fixed assets, much higher resource intensity and lower productivity, unrealistic in a few years to carry out innovative modernization of machine-building industries for the production of means of production. An acute threat has been revealed that the unlimited increase in speculative capital has exacerbated structural imbalances between the real and financial sectors. The main negative consequences of the crisis for the financial and banking system are systematized: they include more than three devaluations of the hryvnia, liquidation of more than a hundred banks and privatization of the largest of them, Privatbank, closure of several thousand banking branches and large–scale unemployment. It is confirmed that the third financial and economic crisis of 2020–2021 has a natural origin – it was caused by the pandemic COVID-19 caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV, and its consequences. It is established that the corona crisis has provoked various negative effects on the work of industry and social services, has caused significant damage to all countries and the vast majority of the world's population. It is shown that Ukraine proved to be more resilient to these troubles and the pre-crisis revival began in the second quarter of this year. It is substantiated that the implementation of macroprudential policy measures aimed at preventing the accumulation and implementation of systemic risks in the financial sector will help increase the stability of the financial and banking system, properly perform its main functions – financial intermediation and payments – and crisis management. It is shown that timely and effective implementation of macroprudential instruments will increase the stability of the national economy and reduce GDP volatility. Key words: financial and economic crisis, stability of the financial and banking system, economic cycle, market turbulence, inflation, capital movements, financial markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代金融和经济危机以及乌克兰金融和银行体系的稳定
对各种因素、问题和风险进行分析和系统化,特别是技术-技术和创新的落后,处于不同发展阶段的国家经济制度中经济周期的特点,以及由于其中一些国家在全球化世界中竞争力的增强。危机。研究表明,随着世界经济的增长,情况也在恶化,在这种背景下,全球金融体系的不平衡正在加剧,投机资本正在蔓延。据披露,2008-2010年的第一次全球危机是由美国房地产市场抵押贷款失控蔓延并将这一过程转移到其他国家引发的,导致“金融泡沫”、市场崩溃和涉及他人的连锁反应。市场。强调的是,当乌克兰经济处于永久性危机状态时,国内银行体系经受住了所有国内经济、金融、货币和其他变化以及外部动荡,这些动荡引发了负面趋势的加强。可以确定2014-2016年的第二次金融经济危机很大程度上是由内部问题造成的:技术结构低得多(经济发达国家为第三、第四,经济发达国家为第五、第六),乌克兰工业在创新方面明显落后于欧盟国家,固定资产折旧水平高,资源强度高得多,生产率低,在几年内对生产资料的机械制造工业进行创新现代化是不现实的。一个严重的威胁已经暴露出来,即投机资本的无限增长加剧了实体部门和金融部门之间的结构性失衡。危机对金融和银行系统的主要负面影响是系统化的:它们包括格里夫纳的三次以上贬值,一百多家银行的清算和其中最大的私有化,私人银行,数千家银行分行的关闭和大规模失业。经证实,2020-2021年的第三次金融和经济危机有一个自然起源——它是由冠状病毒SARS-CoV引起的COVID-19大流行及其后果引起的。毋庸置疑,冠状病毒危机对工业和社会服务工作造成了各种负面影响,对所有国家和世界绝大多数人口造成了重大损害。事实证明,乌克兰对这些麻烦的适应能力更强,今年第二季度开始出现危机前的复苏。事实证明,实施旨在防止金融部门系统性风险积累和实施的宏观审慎政策措施,将有助于增强金融和银行体系的稳定性,妥善履行其主要职能-金融中介和支付-以及危机管理。研究表明,及时有效地实施宏观审慎工具,将增加国民经济的稳定性,降低GDP的波动性。关键词:金融和经济危机,金融和银行体系稳定,经济周期,市场动荡,通货膨胀,资本流动,金融市场
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving the system of university educational activity quality management Foreign trade in agri-food products between Ukraine and the United Kingdom of Great Britain Current challenges of agricultural trade liberalisation between Ukraine and the EU Socio-economic role and institutional capacity of family farms in the implementation of the sustainable development goals Assessment of risks and prospects of employment and income of the rural population of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1