Aquaculture carrying capacity of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and Nile crocodile Crocodylus niloticus in Lake Kariba, Zambia and Zimbabwe

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Aquaculture Environment Interactions Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3354/aei00427
K. te Velde, E. Peeters, M. Verdegem, J. Beijer
{"title":"Aquaculture carrying capacity of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and Nile crocodile Crocodylus niloticus in Lake Kariba, Zambia and Zimbabwe","authors":"K. te Velde, E. Peeters, M. Verdegem, J. Beijer","doi":"10.3354/aei00427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Increased aquaculture production can improve food and nutrition security and economic growth in developing countries, but comes with environmental risks. In recent years, aquaculture has increased tremendously in Lake Kariba, which is located on the border between Zambia and Zimbabwe. We calculated the carrying capacity of aquaculture production in Lake Kariba using the Beveridge P balance model with data for lake-wide total-P concentrations, river flows and data from aquaculture farms and feed producers in the Lake Kariba area. The maximum permissible P load for aquaculture farms in Lake Kariba is 1.2 × 10 6 kg P yr −1 . Average loss of P to the environment in Lake Kariba through farming is 13.92 kg P t −1 for Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and 92.5 kg P t −1 for Nile crocodile Crocodylus niloticus . Consequently, sustainable aquaculture carrying capacity in Lake Kariba is 86900 t yr −1 for O. niloticus and 13000 t yr −1 for C. niloticus . We expect aquaculture production in Lake Kariba to account for 71% of the total allowable aquaculture P load by 2028. The total-P concentration is expected to increase to 28.5 mg m −3 by 2028 due to growth in aquaculture, and its development should be carefully monitored. In future, we recom-mend that our predictions should be compared to observed changes in order to validate the model. We also illustrate that companies can greatly improve the carrying capacity of a system by improving the feed conversion ratio, the efficiency of nutrient uptake and the processing of mortalities.","PeriodicalId":8376,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Environment Interactions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

: Increased aquaculture production can improve food and nutrition security and economic growth in developing countries, but comes with environmental risks. In recent years, aquaculture has increased tremendously in Lake Kariba, which is located on the border between Zambia and Zimbabwe. We calculated the carrying capacity of aquaculture production in Lake Kariba using the Beveridge P balance model with data for lake-wide total-P concentrations, river flows and data from aquaculture farms and feed producers in the Lake Kariba area. The maximum permissible P load for aquaculture farms in Lake Kariba is 1.2 × 10 6 kg P yr −1 . Average loss of P to the environment in Lake Kariba through farming is 13.92 kg P t −1 for Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and 92.5 kg P t −1 for Nile crocodile Crocodylus niloticus . Consequently, sustainable aquaculture carrying capacity in Lake Kariba is 86900 t yr −1 for O. niloticus and 13000 t yr −1 for C. niloticus . We expect aquaculture production in Lake Kariba to account for 71% of the total allowable aquaculture P load by 2028. The total-P concentration is expected to increase to 28.5 mg m −3 by 2028 due to growth in aquaculture, and its development should be carefully monitored. In future, we recom-mend that our predictions should be compared to observed changes in order to validate the model. We also illustrate that companies can greatly improve the carrying capacity of a system by improving the feed conversion ratio, the efficiency of nutrient uptake and the processing of mortalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赞比亚和津巴布韦卡里巴湖尼罗罗非鱼和尼罗鳄的养殖承载能力
:水产养殖产量的增加可以改善发展中国家的粮食和营养安全和经济增长,但也带来了环境风险。近年来,位于赞比亚和津巴布韦边界的卡里巴湖的水产养殖大幅增加。采用贝弗里奇P平衡模型,结合全湖全磷浓度、河流流量和卡里巴湖区养殖场和饲料生产商的数据,计算了卡里巴湖水产养殖生产的承载能力。卡里巴湖养殖场最大允许磷负荷为1.2 × 10.6 kg P年−1。卡里巴湖通过养殖向环境中损失的磷平均为尼罗罗非鱼13.92 kg P t−1,尼罗鳄92.5 kg P t−1。因此,卡里巴湖的可持续水产养殖承载能力为尼罗僵菌86900 t yr - 1,尼罗僵菌13000 t yr - 1。我们预计,到2028年,卡里巴湖的水产养殖产量将占水产养殖总允许磷负荷的71%。由于水产养殖的增长,预计到2028年总磷浓度将增加到28.5 mg m−3,应密切监测其发展情况。在未来,我们建议将我们的预测与观察到的变化进行比较,以验证模型。我们还说明,公司可以通过提高饲料转化率、营养吸收效率和处理死亡率来大大提高系统的承载能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture Environment Interactions
Aquaculture Environment Interactions FISHERIES-MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AEI presents rigorously refereed and carefully selected Research Articles, Reviews and Notes, as well as Comments/Reply Comments (for details see MEPS 228:1), Theme Sections and Opinion Pieces. For details consult the Guidelines for Authors. Papers may be concerned with inter­actions between aquaculture and the environment from local to ecosystem scales, at all levels of organisation and investigation. Areas covered include: -Pollution and nutrient inputs; bio-accumulation and impacts of chemical compounds used in aquaculture. -Effects on benthic and pelagic assemblages or pro­cesses that are related to aquaculture activities. -Interactions of wild fauna (invertebrates, fishes, birds, mammals) with aquaculture activities; genetic impacts on wild populations. -Parasite and pathogen interactions between farmed and wild stocks. -Comparisons of the environmental effects of traditional and organic aquaculture. -Introductions of alien species; escape and intentional releases (seeding) of cultured organisms into the wild. -Effects of capture-based aquaculture (ranching). -Interactions of aquaculture installations with biofouling organisms and consequences of biofouling control measures. -Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture; comparisons of re-circulation and ‘open’ systems. -Effects of climate change and environmental variability on aquaculture activities. -Modelling of aquaculture–environment interactions; ­assessment of carrying capacity. -Interactions between aquaculture and other industries (e.g. tourism, fisheries, transport). -Policy and practice of aquaculture regulation directed towards environmental management; site selection, spatial planning, Integrated Coastal Zone Management, and eco-ethics.
期刊最新文献
Fish dispersal from a sabotage-mediated massive escape event Effects on enzyme activity and DNA integrity in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss exposed to fish farm effluents Invasion risk to the United States from Arapaima spp. hinges on climate suitability Accumulation of microcystins, bacterial community composition and mlrA gene abundance in shrimp culture ponds Quantification of finfish assemblages associated with mussel and seaweed farms in southwest UK provides evidence of potential benefits to fisheries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1