Prospects of Plumbago rosea L. hairy root culture in traditional preparations: a phytochemical comparison with tuberous roots

IF 1 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Plant Root Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3117/PLANTROOT.8.13
K. Satheeshkumar, B. Jose, Dhanya B. Pillai, P. Krishnan
{"title":"Prospects of Plumbago rosea L. hairy root culture in traditional preparations: a phytochemical comparison with tuberous roots","authors":"K. Satheeshkumar, B. Jose, Dhanya B. Pillai, P. Krishnan","doi":"10.3117/PLANTROOT.8.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agrobacterium rhizogenes mediated hairy root culture of Plumbago rosea L. is an attractive alternative for the production of plumbagin which is the major bioactive compound in P. rosea tuberous roots. The traditional industries form the major consumer of the tuberous roots as these are used in many ayurvedic preparations. The present work investigates the prospects of utilizing hairy roots in the place of tuberous roots based on bacterial survival test of hairy roots and comparison through phytochemical analyses (TLC, Spectrophotometry, HPLC and LC-MS). Since the traditional system of medicine follows stringent curing procedure before incorporation of the roots in medicinal preparations, cured tuberous and hairy roots were also compared. The phytochemical profile of hairy roots was remarkably similar to that of tuberous roots. Curing caused no change in the phytotchemical composition of the roots but only a reduction in the amount of plumbagin and other molecules. Plumbagin was reduced to 0.372 ± 0.026% dry weight (DW) in cured tuberous roots (1.15 ± 0.08% DW in uncured) and 0.061± 0.0043% DW in cured hairy roots (1.32 ± 0.09% DW in uncured). An 11.3 fold increase in root biomass with 1.56% DW plumbagin obtained in bioreactor as against 5.39 fold in shake-flasks (with 1% w/v inoculum over 3 weeks period), adds to the prospects of its applicability in traditional systems. The results suggest a refurbishment of conventional high quantity cured roots in traditional preparations with low quantity uncured roots, irrespective of root types.","PeriodicalId":20205,"journal":{"name":"Plant Root","volume":"8 1","pages":"13-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Root","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3117/PLANTROOT.8.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Agrobacterium rhizogenes mediated hairy root culture of Plumbago rosea L. is an attractive alternative for the production of plumbagin which is the major bioactive compound in P. rosea tuberous roots. The traditional industries form the major consumer of the tuberous roots as these are used in many ayurvedic preparations. The present work investigates the prospects of utilizing hairy roots in the place of tuberous roots based on bacterial survival test of hairy roots and comparison through phytochemical analyses (TLC, Spectrophotometry, HPLC and LC-MS). Since the traditional system of medicine follows stringent curing procedure before incorporation of the roots in medicinal preparations, cured tuberous and hairy roots were also compared. The phytochemical profile of hairy roots was remarkably similar to that of tuberous roots. Curing caused no change in the phytotchemical composition of the roots but only a reduction in the amount of plumbagin and other molecules. Plumbagin was reduced to 0.372 ± 0.026% dry weight (DW) in cured tuberous roots (1.15 ± 0.08% DW in uncured) and 0.061± 0.0043% DW in cured hairy roots (1.32 ± 0.09% DW in uncured). An 11.3 fold increase in root biomass with 1.56% DW plumbagin obtained in bioreactor as against 5.39 fold in shake-flasks (with 1% w/v inoculum over 3 weeks period), adds to the prospects of its applicability in traditional systems. The results suggest a refurbishment of conventional high quantity cured roots in traditional preparations with low quantity uncured roots, irrespective of root types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统制剂中紫花苜蓿毛状根培养的前景:与块根的植物化学比较
根际农杆菌介导的毛状根培养是生产玫瑰紫花苜蓿块根中主要生物活性物质白桦素的一种有吸引力的替代方法。传统工业形成了块根的主要消费者,因为这些被用于许多阿育吠陀制剂。本文通过毛状根细菌存活试验和植物化学分析(薄层色谱法、分光光度法、高效液相色谱法和质谱法)的比较,探讨了毛状根替代块根的应用前景。由于传统医学系统在将根纳入药物制剂之前遵循严格的治疗程序,因此也比较了治愈的块根和毛根。毛状根的植物化学特征与块根非常相似。烘烤没有引起根的植物化学成分的变化,只是减少了铅白金素和其他分子的数量。根茎干重(DW)为0.372±0.026%(未处理1.15±0.08%),毛状根干重(DW)为0.061±0.0043%(未处理1.32±0.09%)。在生物反应器中获得1.56% DW白丹素,根生物量增加11.3倍,而在摇瓶中(接种量为1% w/v, 3周),根生物量增加5.39倍,这增加了其在传统体系中的适用性前景。结果表明,在传统制剂中使用少量未固化的根,无论根类型如何,都可以翻新传统的高量固化根。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Root
Plant Root PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Plant Root publishes original papers, either theoretical or experimental, that provide novel insights into plant roots. The Journal’s subjects include, but are not restricted to, anatomy and morphology, cellular and molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, interactions with soil, mineral nutrients, water, symbionts and pathogens, food culture, together with ecological, genetic and methodological aspects related to plant roots and rhizosphere. Work at any scale, from the molecular to the community level, is welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Plant growth-enhancing traits of rhizobacteria isolated from brinjal, okra, and leaf mustard Development of a method for high-throughput quantitation of soil-surface roots of rice (Oryza sativa) and wild rice (O. glumaepatula) using an overhead scanner Acidic soil tolerance of sugarcane and Erianthus root assessed by cell membrane stability Strontium-induced mineral imbalance, cell death, and reactive oxygen species generation in Arabidopsis thaliana Genotypic variation in rice root system distribution and activity in response to short-term soil drought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1