Comparing root porosity of sunflower adventitious root segments using cross-sectioning and buoyancy method under hypoxic condition

IF 1 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Plant Root Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3117/PLANTROOT.7.12
Shirin Ahmadi, A. Mostajeran, Sanaz Shokrollahi
{"title":"Comparing root porosity of sunflower adventitious root segments using cross-sectioning and buoyancy method under hypoxic condition","authors":"Shirin Ahmadi, A. Mostajeran, Sanaz Shokrollahi","doi":"10.3117/PLANTROOT.7.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two well-known methods of root porosity measurement (i.e. buoyancy and cross-sectional) were used to evaluate the porosity of adventitious roots of 3-day hypoxia treated sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) cultivars to address the effect of hypoxia on root porosity as well as advantages and disadvantages of each method. In the first experiment, length of adventitious roots of two sunflower cultivars (CMS14 × R-864 and Hysun-33) was divided to three segments as apical, middle, and basal portions and porosity was measured via both methods. In buoyancy method, root porosities of Hysun-33 and CMS14 × R-864 cultivars were 5.12% and 6.47% in aerated and 11.58% and 15.71% in hypoxic condition, respectively. There is no statistically significant difference between cultivars in aerated condition. In contrast, more than twice additional aerenchyma formation was observed due to hypoxic condition in comparison to aerated condition. Results of cross-sectional method showed that middle portion of adventitious roots is the place that aerenchyma initiates to form, but well-developed aerenchyma was seen at about 80-90 mm behind the root apex (basal portion) under hypoxia. The results of root porosity of basal portion of adventitious roots of four sunflower cultivars (CMS14 × R-864, CMS51 × R-14, CMS19 × R-N1-118 and Hysun-33) showed higher amounts of root porosity in buoyancy method in comparison to cross-sectional method.","PeriodicalId":20205,"journal":{"name":"Plant Root","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Root","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3117/PLANTROOT.7.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two well-known methods of root porosity measurement (i.e. buoyancy and cross-sectional) were used to evaluate the porosity of adventitious roots of 3-day hypoxia treated sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) cultivars to address the effect of hypoxia on root porosity as well as advantages and disadvantages of each method. In the first experiment, length of adventitious roots of two sunflower cultivars (CMS14 × R-864 and Hysun-33) was divided to three segments as apical, middle, and basal portions and porosity was measured via both methods. In buoyancy method, root porosities of Hysun-33 and CMS14 × R-864 cultivars were 5.12% and 6.47% in aerated and 11.58% and 15.71% in hypoxic condition, respectively. There is no statistically significant difference between cultivars in aerated condition. In contrast, more than twice additional aerenchyma formation was observed due to hypoxic condition in comparison to aerated condition. Results of cross-sectional method showed that middle portion of adventitious roots is the place that aerenchyma initiates to form, but well-developed aerenchyma was seen at about 80-90 mm behind the root apex (basal portion) under hypoxia. The results of root porosity of basal portion of adventitious roots of four sunflower cultivars (CMS14 × R-864, CMS51 × R-14, CMS19 × R-N1-118 and Hysun-33) showed higher amounts of root porosity in buoyancy method in comparison to cross-sectional method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用横切面法和浮力法比较缺氧条件下向日葵不定根的孔隙度
采用浮力法和横截面法两种著名的根系孔隙度测量方法对缺氧处理3 d的向日葵品种不定根的孔隙度进行了测定,探讨了缺氧对根系孔隙度的影响以及每种方法的优缺点。本试验以2个向日葵品种(CMS14 × R-864和hsun -33)为材料,将不定根的长度分为顶端、中间和基部3个部分,并分别测定气孔率。在浮力条件下,鲜33和CMS14 × R-864的气孔率在曝气条件下分别为5.12%和6.47%,在缺氧条件下分别为11.58%和15.71%。在曝气条件下,各品种间差异无统计学意义。相比之下,缺氧条件下观察到的通气组织形成是通气条件下的两倍多。横切面法结果表明,在缺氧条件下,不定根中部是通气组织开始形成的地方,但在根尖(基部)后约80 ~ 90mm处可见发育良好的通气组织。对4个向日葵品种(CMS14 × R-864、CMS51 × R-14、CMS19 × R-N1-118和hsun33)不定根基部孔隙度的测定结果表明,浮力法的孔隙度高于横截面法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Root
Plant Root PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Plant Root publishes original papers, either theoretical or experimental, that provide novel insights into plant roots. The Journal’s subjects include, but are not restricted to, anatomy and morphology, cellular and molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, interactions with soil, mineral nutrients, water, symbionts and pathogens, food culture, together with ecological, genetic and methodological aspects related to plant roots and rhizosphere. Work at any scale, from the molecular to the community level, is welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Plant growth-enhancing traits of rhizobacteria isolated from brinjal, okra, and leaf mustard Development of a method for high-throughput quantitation of soil-surface roots of rice (Oryza sativa) and wild rice (O. glumaepatula) using an overhead scanner Acidic soil tolerance of sugarcane and Erianthus root assessed by cell membrane stability Strontium-induced mineral imbalance, cell death, and reactive oxygen species generation in Arabidopsis thaliana Genotypic variation in rice root system distribution and activity in response to short-term soil drought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1