COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EXTRA-GROUP PATERNITY IN SUPERB FAIRY-WRENS

P. Dunn, A. Cockburn
{"title":"COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EXTRA-GROUP PATERNITY IN SUPERB FAIRY-WRENS","authors":"P. Dunn, A. Cockburn","doi":"10.2307/40166722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most extreme examples of conflict between the sexes occurs in the Superb Fairy-wren {Malurus cyaneus), a cooperatively breeding bird in which 72% of nestlings were produced by extra-pair fertilizations. Males that gained extra-pair paternity were almost exclusively dominant breeding males out- side the group and not helpers. Group size had a significant effect on the number of young sired by males on their own territory. Males breeding in a pair (no helpers) sired more young (41%, 71/175 young) and provided more parental care (42% of feeding visits) than dominant breeding males that lived in groups with helpers (19%, 56/292 young; 25% of feeding visits). This pattern of extra-group paternity was a result of female choice and control of fertilization. When females lived in a group, helpers compensated for the lower parental assistance of the dominant breeding male, so all offspring were provisioned fully and there was no cost to the female or male in terms of reduced nestling survival. Thus, the mate choice of females with helpers was not constrained by the importance of male parental assistance. In unassisted pairs, females had no alternative source of pa- rental assistance and may have allowed their mates greater paternity to ensure the assistance of the mates in providing parental care. The reduced workload of dom- inant breeding males in groups did not increase their survival; rather, it allowed them more time to engage in courtship displays to females on other territories. This increased display rate of males in groups was associated with a greater likelihood of gaining extra-group fertilizations, and it may have compensated males in groups for their lower within-pair paternity. The release of females from the constraint of male parental care was due to helpers, whereas the reduction in male parental care was most likely the result of a paternity cue and not simply the presence of helpers per se. After controlling statistically for group size, males provided less parental care when they had lower paternity. Thus, a detailed knowl- edge of the alternatives available to females (other sources of parental assistance) and males (opportunities for extra-pair matings) may be necessary to understand male and female reproductive strategies.","PeriodicalId":54665,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Monographs","volume":"1 1","pages":"147-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40166722","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40166722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

One of the most extreme examples of conflict between the sexes occurs in the Superb Fairy-wren {Malurus cyaneus), a cooperatively breeding bird in which 72% of nestlings were produced by extra-pair fertilizations. Males that gained extra-pair paternity were almost exclusively dominant breeding males out- side the group and not helpers. Group size had a significant effect on the number of young sired by males on their own territory. Males breeding in a pair (no helpers) sired more young (41%, 71/175 young) and provided more parental care (42% of feeding visits) than dominant breeding males that lived in groups with helpers (19%, 56/292 young; 25% of feeding visits). This pattern of extra-group paternity was a result of female choice and control of fertilization. When females lived in a group, helpers compensated for the lower parental assistance of the dominant breeding male, so all offspring were provisioned fully and there was no cost to the female or male in terms of reduced nestling survival. Thus, the mate choice of females with helpers was not constrained by the importance of male parental assistance. In unassisted pairs, females had no alternative source of pa- rental assistance and may have allowed their mates greater paternity to ensure the assistance of the mates in providing parental care. The reduced workload of dom- inant breeding males in groups did not increase their survival; rather, it allowed them more time to engage in courtship displays to females on other territories. This increased display rate of males in groups was associated with a greater likelihood of gaining extra-group fertilizations, and it may have compensated males in groups for their lower within-pair paternity. The release of females from the constraint of male parental care was due to helpers, whereas the reduction in male parental care was most likely the result of a paternity cue and not simply the presence of helpers per se. After controlling statistically for group size, males provided less parental care when they had lower paternity. Thus, a detailed knowl- edge of the alternatives available to females (other sources of parental assistance) and males (opportunities for extra-pair matings) may be necessary to understand male and female reproductive strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超级细尾鹩莺群体外父权的成本与收益
两性冲突最极端的例子之一发生在超级仙女鹪鹩(Malurus cyaneus)身上,这是一种合作繁殖的鸟类,其中72%的雏鸟是通过额外的配对受精产生的。获得额外父权的雄性几乎完全是群体外的优势繁殖雄性,而不是帮助者。群体大小对雄性在其领地内的后代数量有显著影响。与有帮助者群体的雄性(19%,56/292)相比,无帮助者群体的雄性繁殖后代更多(41%,71/175),并提供更多的亲代照顾(42%的喂食次数);25%的喂食次数)。这种群体外父权模式是雌性选择和控制受精的结果。当雌性生活在一个群体中时,帮助者弥补了优势繁殖雄性较低的亲代帮助,因此所有的后代都得到了充分的供应,雌性或雄性都不会因为雏鸟存活率的降低而付出代价。因此,有帮助者的雌性的配偶选择不受雄性父母帮助的重要性的限制。在没有帮助的成对中,雌性没有其他的父权援助来源,可能会让它们的伴侣有更大的父权,以确保伴侣在提供亲代照顾方面的帮助。在群体中,减少多仔繁殖雄性的工作量并没有增加它们的存活率;相反,这让它们有更多的时间向其他领地的雌性求爱。群体中雄性的这种增加的展示率与获得群体外受精的可能性更大有关,这可能弥补了群体中雄性较低的父权关系。女性从男性亲代照顾的束缚中解脱出来是由于帮手的存在,而男性亲代照顾的减少很可能是父权暗示的结果,而不仅仅是帮手本身的存在。在对群体规模进行统计控制后,当雄性的父权地位较低时,它们提供的亲代照顾较少。因此,要了解雄性和雌性的生殖策略,有必要详细了解雌性(其他的亲代帮助来源)和雄性(额外配对的机会)的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Juvenile Survival in Birds Introduction to the Skeleton of Hummingbirds (Aves: Apodiformes, Trochilidae) in Functional and Phylogenetic Contexts Diversity, Prevalence, and Host Specificity of Avian Plasmodium and Haemoproteus in a Western Amazon Assemblage Ecology of Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii) in the Sierra Nevada, California: Effects of Meadow Characteristics and Weather on Demographics POTENTIAL ACOUSTIC MASKING OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE (CENTROCERCUS UROPHASIANUS) DISPLAY COMPONENTS BY CHRONIC INDUSTRIAL NOISE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1