The approach of emergency physicians to patients with acute renal colic

Ö. Bozan, Y. O. Danacıoğlu, Mehmet Muzaffer Islam
{"title":"The approach of emergency physicians to patients with acute renal colic","authors":"Ö. Bozan, Y. O. Danacıoğlu, Mehmet Muzaffer Islam","doi":"10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-1016256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was conducted to describe the current diagnosis and treatment strategies of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with acute renal colic. Material and Methods: In this study, an internet-based cross-sectional survey was administered to emergency medicine physicians. In addition to the participants’ demographic data, such as age and gender, years of experience in the emergency medicine department, and whether they were a specialist or resident, the survey also inquired about their choices of imaging methods, laboratory tests, analgesic medications, and intravenous fluids, and tendency to refer patients to a urologist for a consultation. Results: The median age of the 108 volunteers participating in the study was calculated as 31 (27 - 34.8) years and their years of experience as 4 (2-8) years. More than half (60.2%, n=65) of the participants were emergency medicine residents, while the remaining 39.8% (n=43) were emergency medicine specialists. The emergency medicine specialists and residents were compared in terms of the variables related to their approaches to patients presenting to the emergency department with a preliminary diagnosis of renal colic. The first choice of analgesic drugs was dichotomised as diclofenac and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with 34 (79.1%) of the specialists and 60 (92.3%) of the residents reporting diclofenac as their first choice, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: In this study, the emergency medicine residents preferred diclofenac more than the emergency medicine specialists in primary care, although they had similar renal colic imaging methods preferences. Keywords: Acute renal colic, emergency medicine, kidney stone.","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-1-1016256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to describe the current diagnosis and treatment strategies of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with acute renal colic. Material and Methods: In this study, an internet-based cross-sectional survey was administered to emergency medicine physicians. In addition to the participants’ demographic data, such as age and gender, years of experience in the emergency medicine department, and whether they were a specialist or resident, the survey also inquired about their choices of imaging methods, laboratory tests, analgesic medications, and intravenous fluids, and tendency to refer patients to a urologist for a consultation. Results: The median age of the 108 volunteers participating in the study was calculated as 31 (27 - 34.8) years and their years of experience as 4 (2-8) years. More than half (60.2%, n=65) of the participants were emergency medicine residents, while the remaining 39.8% (n=43) were emergency medicine specialists. The emergency medicine specialists and residents were compared in terms of the variables related to their approaches to patients presenting to the emergency department with a preliminary diagnosis of renal colic. The first choice of analgesic drugs was dichotomised as diclofenac and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, with 34 (79.1%) of the specialists and 60 (92.3%) of the residents reporting diclofenac as their first choice, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: In this study, the emergency medicine residents preferred diclofenac more than the emergency medicine specialists in primary care, although they had similar renal colic imaging methods preferences. Keywords: Acute renal colic, emergency medicine, kidney stone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊医师对急性肾绞痛患者的处理方法
目的:探讨急诊科收治的急性肾绞痛患者的诊治现状。材料与方法:在本研究中,对急诊医师进行了基于互联网的横断面调查。除了参与者的人口统计数据,如年龄和性别,在急诊科的工作年限,以及他们是专科医生还是住院医生,调查还询问了他们对成像方法、实验室检查、镇痛药物和静脉输液的选择,以及将患者转介给泌尿科医生咨询的倾向。结果:108名志愿者的年龄中位数为31(27 - 34.8)岁,经验年数为4(2-8)岁。超过一半(60.2%,n=65)的参与者是急诊医学住院医师,其余39.8% (n=43)的参与者是急诊医学专家。我们比较了急诊医学专家和住院医师在处理初步诊断为肾绞痛的急诊科患者的方法方面的变量。首选镇痛药分为双氯芬酸和其他非甾体类抗炎药,34名专科医生(79.1%)和60名住院医生(92.3%)报告双氯芬酸为首选镇痛药,两组差异有统计学意义。结论:在本研究中,尽管急诊内科住院医师对肾绞痛成像方法的偏好相似,但在初级保健中,他们比急诊内科专家更喜欢双氯芬酸。关键词:急性肾绞痛,急诊医学,肾结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1