At what stage are we in active surveillance for localized prostate cancer? Our clinical experience

I. Evren, Y. O. Danacıoğlu, M. Ekşi, D. N. Özlü, A. Hacıislamoğlu, Y. Arıkan, Ã. Ayten, H. Polat
{"title":"At what stage are we in active surveillance for localized prostate cancer? Our clinical experience","authors":"I. Evren, Y. O. Danacıoğlu, M. Ekşi, D. N. Özlü, A. Hacıislamoğlu, Y. Arıkan, Ã. Ayten, H. Polat","doi":"10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1129666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men and early diagnosis can be made by screening. Active surveillance (AS) is one of the options for disease management in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate our clinical experience in AS for prostate cancer. Material and Methods: Data from 1650 patients who were diagnosed with PCa in the period between January 2014 and December 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were defined as being under 75 years of age and having a 10-year life expectancy, being at clinical stages of T1-T2a, having a PSA level of <10 ng/dl, having positive biopsy cores of ≤2, and having a Gleason score of ≤6 as the result of the pathological examination of the biopsy specimen. Patients not meeting any of the inclusion criteria were excluded from the study. Results: After the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 176 patients agreed to undergo AS and were included in the study. The mean follow-up duration was 25.2 ± 13 months. A total of 57 patients (32.3%) left the AS program to undergo definitive treatment. Definitive treatment was radical prostatectomy in 38 (65.5%) patients, radiotherapy in 18 (31%) patients, and hormonotherapy in one (1.7%) patient. Conclusion: AS is a method that helps avoid the complications of definitive treatment in LRPC patients. It can be used as an alternative option to definitive treatment in the management of these patients. However, it should not be forgotten that pathological upgrades may occur in 30% of AS patients, indicating the need for definitive treatment. Keywords: prostate cancer, active surveillance, low-risk prostate cancer","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2023;18-1-1129666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men and early diagnosis can be made by screening. Active surveillance (AS) is one of the options for disease management in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate our clinical experience in AS for prostate cancer. Material and Methods: Data from 1650 patients who were diagnosed with PCa in the period between January 2014 and December 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were defined as being under 75 years of age and having a 10-year life expectancy, being at clinical stages of T1-T2a, having a PSA level of <10 ng/dl, having positive biopsy cores of ≤2, and having a Gleason score of ≤6 as the result of the pathological examination of the biopsy specimen. Patients not meeting any of the inclusion criteria were excluded from the study. Results: After the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 176 patients agreed to undergo AS and were included in the study. The mean follow-up duration was 25.2 ± 13 months. A total of 57 patients (32.3%) left the AS program to undergo definitive treatment. Definitive treatment was radical prostatectomy in 38 (65.5%) patients, radiotherapy in 18 (31%) patients, and hormonotherapy in one (1.7%) patient. Conclusion: AS is a method that helps avoid the complications of definitive treatment in LRPC patients. It can be used as an alternative option to definitive treatment in the management of these patients. However, it should not be forgotten that pathological upgrades may occur in 30% of AS patients, indicating the need for definitive treatment. Keywords: prostate cancer, active surveillance, low-risk prostate cancer
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们处于主动监测局部前列腺癌的哪个阶段?我们的临床经验
目的:前列腺癌是男性最常见的恶性肿瘤,可通过筛查进行早期诊断。主动监测(AS)是低危前列腺癌(LRPC)患者疾病管理的选择之一。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估我们在AS治疗前列腺癌的临床经验。材料和方法:回顾性分析了2014年1月至2019年12月期间诊断为PCa的1650例患者的数据。纳入标准定义为年龄在75岁以下,预期寿命10年,临床分期T1-T2a, PSA水平<10 ng/dl,活检阳性芯≤2,活检标本病理检查Gleason评分≤6。不符合任何纳入标准的患者被排除在研究之外。结果:根据纳入和排除标准,176例患者同意接受AS治疗并纳入研究。平均随访时间25.2±13个月。共有57名患者(32.3%)离开AS项目接受最终治疗。最终治疗为38例(65.5%)患者根治性前列腺切除术,18例(31%)患者放疗,1例(1.7%)患者激素治疗。结论:AS是一种有效避免LRPC患者最终治疗并发症的方法。在这些患者的管理中,它可以作为确定治疗的替代选择。然而,不应忘记的是,30%的AS患者可能出现病理升级,这表明需要进行明确的治疗。关键词:前列腺癌,主动监测,低危前列腺癌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1