Relationship between the prostate cancer screening attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge levels of men working in a healthcare institution

İ. Ozdemi̇r, F. Çalışkan, Y. O. Danacıoğlu
{"title":"Relationship between the prostate cancer screening attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge levels of men working in a healthcare institution","authors":"İ. Ozdemi̇r, F. Çalışkan, Y. O. Danacıoğlu","doi":"10.33719/yud.2023;18-2-1270777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The attitudes and knowledge level of individuals toward prostate cancer screening are important factors affecting participation in screening. This study aimed to determine the relationship between prostate cancer screening attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge levels of men working in a tertiary healthcare institution. Material and Methods: A total of 236 healthcare personnel working in a tertiary education and research hospital were included in the study. In the collection of data, an information form, the Health Beliefs Model Scale for Prostate Cancer Screenings (HBM-PCS), and the Knowledge About Prostate Cancer Screening Questionnaire (KPCSQ) were used. Results: The mean age of the men participating in the study was 46.7±5.9 years. Of the participants, 16.1% had previously undergone a prostate-specific antigen test, and 67.4% had a low level of knowledge. When the subscales of HBM-PCS were examined, the participants had a mean score of 12.6±3.8 on susceptibility perception, 11.9±3.6 on seriousness perception, 32.9±7.6 on health motivation perception, 38.5±10.3 on barrier perception, and 24.8±5.7 on benefit perception. There was no significant difference in the participants’ HBM-PCS scores according to their KPCSQ scores. Conclusion: It was determined that the men participating in this study had a low level of knowledge, moderate levels of susceptibility, seriousness, and barrier perceptions, and high levels of health motivation and benefit perceptions concerning prostate cancer screening. It is important to raise the awareness of healthcare workers about the benefits of screening and early diagnosis of prostate cancer through training programs. Keywords: prostate cancer, screening, attitude, belief, knowledge level","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2023;18-2-1270777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The attitudes and knowledge level of individuals toward prostate cancer screening are important factors affecting participation in screening. This study aimed to determine the relationship between prostate cancer screening attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge levels of men working in a tertiary healthcare institution. Material and Methods: A total of 236 healthcare personnel working in a tertiary education and research hospital were included in the study. In the collection of data, an information form, the Health Beliefs Model Scale for Prostate Cancer Screenings (HBM-PCS), and the Knowledge About Prostate Cancer Screening Questionnaire (KPCSQ) were used. Results: The mean age of the men participating in the study was 46.7±5.9 years. Of the participants, 16.1% had previously undergone a prostate-specific antigen test, and 67.4% had a low level of knowledge. When the subscales of HBM-PCS were examined, the participants had a mean score of 12.6±3.8 on susceptibility perception, 11.9±3.6 on seriousness perception, 32.9±7.6 on health motivation perception, 38.5±10.3 on barrier perception, and 24.8±5.7 on benefit perception. There was no significant difference in the participants’ HBM-PCS scores according to their KPCSQ scores. Conclusion: It was determined that the men participating in this study had a low level of knowledge, moderate levels of susceptibility, seriousness, and barrier perceptions, and high levels of health motivation and benefit perceptions concerning prostate cancer screening. It is important to raise the awareness of healthcare workers about the benefits of screening and early diagnosis of prostate cancer through training programs. Keywords: prostate cancer, screening, attitude, belief, knowledge level
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医疗机构工作的男性前列腺癌筛查态度、信念和知识水平之间的关系
目的:个体对前列腺癌筛查的态度和知识水平是影响其参与筛查的重要因素。本研究旨在确定在三级医疗机构工作的男性前列腺癌筛查态度、信念和知识水平之间的关系。材料和方法:本研究共纳入236名在高等教育和研究型医院工作的医护人员。在数据收集方面,采用信息表、前列腺癌筛查健康信念模型量表(HBM-PCS)和前列腺癌筛查知识问卷(KPCSQ)。结果:参与研究的男性平均年龄为46.7±5.9岁。在参与者中,16.1%的人以前接受过前列腺特异性抗原检测,67.4%的人对前列腺特异性抗原的知识水平较低。结果显示,受试者的易感性知觉平均得分为12.6±3.8分,严重性知觉平均得分为11.9±3.6分,健康动机知觉平均得分为32.9±7.6分,障碍知觉平均得分为38.5±10.3分,利益知觉平均得分为24.8±5.7分。根据受试者的KPCSQ得分,受试者的HBM-PCS得分无显著差异。结论:参与本研究的男性对前列腺癌筛查的认知水平较低,易感性、严重度和障碍认知水平中等,健康动机和获益认知水平较高。通过培训项目,提高医护人员对前列腺癌筛查和早期诊断的益处的认识是很重要的。关键词:前列腺癌,筛查,态度,信念,知识水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1