Interactive Cases of Bioethics and Public Health: By the Examples of Counteraction to Xenophobia, Discrimination and Inequality

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION Acta Balneologica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.36740/abal202201118
Hanna Hubenko, N. Boichenko, Svitlana M Piven, Natallia G. Kuchma, A. Bondarkova
{"title":"Interactive Cases of Bioethics and Public Health: By the Examples of Counteraction to Xenophobia, Discrimination and Inequality","authors":"Hanna Hubenko, N. Boichenko, Svitlana M Piven, Natallia G. Kuchma, A. Bondarkova","doi":"10.36740/abal202201118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This article examines how bioethicists can make a significant contribution to mediation, public discourse, research, educating, learning, policy-making and academic impact in response to troubling and persistent models of xenophobia, racism and ‘pretentious’ prejudice. In order to make a meaningful contribution to these issues, bioethicists need training, awareness that they can play an important educational role in cooperation with other specialists and social spheres. Materials and Methods: An understanding of these issues from the perspective of bioethics is important in terms of the methodological approach that is used in its explanations. For example, in education, public health, etc. In the course of the research the bibliographic, bibliosemantic method, the method of system analysis. Conclusions: The main mechanism for combating xenophobia is the development of personal and social tolerance. Tolerance does not require an obligatory love to «our own»’ and to «others», but offers recognition of the real pluralism of cultures and ways of life, Professional training of/for bioethicists as partners/trainers who work together with the community to create solutions. Thus, as bioethicists, we create new educational and cultural programmes based on the knowledge gained through the integration of previous projects in various layers of society. They stimulate ethical and creative thinking, create conditions for team learning and encourage people in teams to find innovative ways of operating in contexts of high uncertainty and complexity of the 21st century. We therefore assume that bioethicists, as agents of change, are able to operate on various educational levels (starting from the primary level), contributing to increasing awareness and tolerance of one country’s population by communicating key bioethical messages. The purpose of bioethicists as educational tutors will be not only to understand the social and psychological sources of xenophobia and discrimination manifestations, but also to corroborate existing negative attitudes and stereotypes prevalent in the modern society.","PeriodicalId":42213,"journal":{"name":"Acta Balneologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Balneologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/abal202201118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This article examines how bioethicists can make a significant contribution to mediation, public discourse, research, educating, learning, policy-making and academic impact in response to troubling and persistent models of xenophobia, racism and ‘pretentious’ prejudice. In order to make a meaningful contribution to these issues, bioethicists need training, awareness that they can play an important educational role in cooperation with other specialists and social spheres. Materials and Methods: An understanding of these issues from the perspective of bioethics is important in terms of the methodological approach that is used in its explanations. For example, in education, public health, etc. In the course of the research the bibliographic, bibliosemantic method, the method of system analysis. Conclusions: The main mechanism for combating xenophobia is the development of personal and social tolerance. Tolerance does not require an obligatory love to «our own»’ and to «others», but offers recognition of the real pluralism of cultures and ways of life, Professional training of/for bioethicists as partners/trainers who work together with the community to create solutions. Thus, as bioethicists, we create new educational and cultural programmes based on the knowledge gained through the integration of previous projects in various layers of society. They stimulate ethical and creative thinking, create conditions for team learning and encourage people in teams to find innovative ways of operating in contexts of high uncertainty and complexity of the 21st century. We therefore assume that bioethicists, as agents of change, are able to operate on various educational levels (starting from the primary level), contributing to increasing awareness and tolerance of one country’s population by communicating key bioethical messages. The purpose of bioethicists as educational tutors will be not only to understand the social and psychological sources of xenophobia and discrimination manifestations, but also to corroborate existing negative attitudes and stereotypes prevalent in the modern society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物伦理与公共卫生的互动案例:以抵制仇外心理、歧视和不平等为例
目的:本文探讨了生物伦理学家如何在调解、公共话语、研究、教育、学习、政策制定和学术影响方面做出重大贡献,以应对令人不安和持续存在的仇外心理、种族主义和“自命”偏见模式。为了对这些问题作出有意义的贡献,生物伦理学家需要接受培训,认识到他们可以在与其他专家和社会领域的合作中发挥重要的教育作用。材料和方法:从生物伦理学的角度对这些问题的理解对于在其解释中使用的方法论方法是重要的。例如,在教育、公共卫生等方面。在研究过程中采用了目录学方法、书目语义学方法、系统分析法。结论:打击仇外心理的主要机制是发展个人和社会的宽容。宽容并不要求对“我们自己的”和“他人”的强制性的爱,而是提供对文化和生活方式的真正多元化的承认。生物伦理学家作为合作伙伴/培训师的专业培训,与社区一起创造解决方案。因此,作为生物伦理学家,我们通过整合以前在社会各阶层的项目所获得的知识,创造了新的教育和文化项目。它们激发道德和创造性思维,为团队学习创造条件,并鼓励团队成员在21世纪高度不确定性和复杂性的背景下找到创新的运作方式。因此,我们假设生物伦理学家作为变革的推动者,能够在不同的教育水平上运作(从初级水平开始),通过传播关键的生物伦理信息,为提高一个国家人口的意识和容忍度做出贡献。生物伦理学家作为教育导师的目的不仅是了解仇外心理和歧视表现形式的社会和心理根源,而且还要证实现代社会中普遍存在的消极态度和陈规定型观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Balneologica
Acta Balneologica REHABILITATION-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular Reaction to Orthostatic Test Among Non-functional Overreaching Athletes with Vegetative Disorders (The Physical Therapist Perspective) Comparative Analysis of Complex Programs of Renewal Treatment of Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis Informal Professional Communication of Rehabilitation Specialists and its Significance for their Practical Activities Complex Rehabilitation of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease The impact of WATSU as Physiotherapy Method on Fatigue for People Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1